About to have a threesome...

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SteveWinwood

Member
White Man said:
I want everyone here to know: this is how I'm going to treat the mass amount of shitty GAF relationship threads from here on out. If there's not some sort of evidence or convincing story posted, you're not going to be hanging around for too long. Relationship threads have been a cancer on the OT forum and they need to be erased.
Click to expand...

best mod

thank you for saving us
 
R

Ryaaan14

Banned
richisawesome said:
To be fair, having a threesome with a couple then an hour later having to go back to them to say "hey guys, I need to get a photo of us all together to prove we fucked" is a little bit...well, I'd find it difficult.

Either way, I've had many, many sexual experiences before - making GAF know about them is the least of my concerns. But that's just my view. Either way, all I know is that I wouldn't have made this thread.
Click to expand...

I think the point is less of "Well, I better find some way to prove this" and more of a "Maybe I shouldn't even make this a thread in the first place"
 
S

Sobriquet

Member
skinnyrattler said:
I think he just posted pictures of them fully clothed. Nothing to suggest he was having a threesome.
Click to expand...

It was seemingly verified by another GAFfer:

animlboogy said:
I am the "Gus" from the text and I can confirm that he is indeed a real person who is took drugz and probably let a dude lick his butt last night.

He asked me for advice about this a few weeks back as well. I've only had the other kind of threesome and even that was a bit odd so uh... Dunno what to say about how to handle someone else's dong constantly in your peripheral while you go at it.
Click to expand...
 
B

biggersmaller

Banned
Ryaaan14 said:
I think the point is less of "Well, I better find some way to prove this" and more of a "Maybe I shouldn't even make this a thread in the first place"
Click to expand...

Still - a mod symbolically asked him to produce evidence fully expecting it to never appear given the timeframe; drops the hammer regardless. I find the depending-on-the-mod police state nature of banning to be both unpredictably ruthless and inexplicably lenient. Hail GAF.

“You must learn to let go. Release the stress. You were never in control anyway.”
 
R

Rich!

Member
Ryaaan14 said:
I made my g/f and IRL GAF friend bday threads and they were counted towards my Junioring. It's actively being enforced, don't worry.
Click to expand...

I've never had birthday thread in five years. or a tag.

Maybe I should be happy I've never received either.

edit: Oh, you edited your post. Well, I wouldn't make my own birthday thread of course.
 
A

A Human Becoming

More than a Member
biggersmaller said:
Still - a mod symbolically asked him to produce evidence fully expecting it to never appear given the timeframe; drops the hammer regardless. I find the depending-on-the-mod police state nature of banning to be both unpredictably ruthless and inexplicably lenient. Hail GAF.

“You must learn to let go. Release the stress. You were never in control anyway.”
Click to expand...
It's always been that way to an extent, especially on Gaming.
 
R

Rich!

Member
A Human Becoming said:
It's always been that way to an extent, especially on Gaming.
Click to expand...

I've been banned due to many reasons on Gaming, some which may class as "silly", but in each time it's served as a learning lesson as how to conduct myself on GAF.

Even the bans which seem petty as hell have a lot of value to them if you think about it. I'd like to think that I've become a better member of GAF over the years - people can dispute or approve of that as they will.
 
K

kswiston

Member
I'd say we've had pretty fair moderation these past 5 years all things considered. You don't see mods pushing specific personal agendas like you did before Stump and Nirolak's generation was added. The mod team seems more united than it was when I joined 9 years ago.
 
B

biggersmaller

Banned
richisawesome said:
I've been banned due to many reasons on Gaming, some which may class as "silly", but in each time it's served as a learning lesson as how to conduct myself on GAF.

Even the bans which seem petty as hell have a lot of value to them if you think about it. I'd like to think that I've become a better member of GAF over the years - people can dispute or approve of that as they will.
Click to expand...

I personally wouldn't read into it too much, friend. You have 10X the posting rate I do, so the law of averages were never on your side.
 
R

royalan

Member
Seems like some people have forgotten the angel of fury known as Dragona

The name still strikes terror in the heart.
 
Astral Dog

Astral Dog

Member
White Man said:
I want everyone here to know: this is how I'm going to treat the mass amount of shitty GAF relationship threads from here on out. If there's not some sort of evidence or convincing story posted, you're not going to be hanging around for too long. Relationship threads have been a cancer on the OT forum and they need to be erased.
Click to expand...

finally, thank god
 
M

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Yeah that seems a bit retroactive. I'm all for what White Man is doing, but realistically there is no way the OP could have posted a pic 'in situ' as the deed had already be done (plus the other two would likely have told him to fuck off). So what was uploaded seems reasonable.

And there wasn't a warning ahead of time to tell the OP not to start this thread. In fact the recent influx of shitty relationship threads might have made him feel safe in posting it.

Oh well
 
S

Spring-Loaded

Member
mrklaw said:
Yeah that seems a bit retroactive. I'm all for what White Man is doing, but realistically there is no way the OP could have posted a pic 'in situ' as the deed had already be done (plus the other two would likely have told him to fuck off). So what was uploaded seems reasonable.

And there wasn't a warning ahead of time to tell the OP not to start this thread. In fact the recent influx of shitty relationship threads might have made him feel safe in posting it.

Oh well
Click to expand...

iCVJVCHsxO0Az.gif
 
BFIB

BFIB

Member
biggersmaller said:
LOL - I will miss relationship GAF. A healthy mix of mock posts and entitled OPs seeking affirmation of their unhealthy antisocial obsessions. I loved the sarcasm and circle jerk of common sense.
Click to expand...

Agreed, but after the past few weeks worth of threads, I see White Man's point. But hopefully that means the threads are always gold that do make it.
 
P

Poltergust

Member
animlboogy said:
I mean... If further confirmation is needed there are lots of pictures of him with other gaffers in SF as well as with me, him and a Guild Wars 2 GAF guild friend.

I don't think needing proof was the point White Man was making though. Basically we all need to think twice before posting something potentially inconsequential in a topic that will get posts regardless of the value of the OP. I'm sure I could post a two sentence tipping thread that would pass 8 pages no problem, for example. Or talk about how rad my foreskin is.
Click to expand...

That makes sense, but wouldn't it be better to start off with a warning (perhaps a board-wide announcement) instead of jumping straight into the ultimatum? It's not like this kind of moderating has precedent (as far as I know; feel free to correct me and disregard this post), so perhaps the OP thought that this kind of thread was permitted. I mean, the direction this thread went really did come out of left field.
 
V

Violet_0

Banned
there should be a rule to post pictures off all participating parties in every sex-thread

e: read the rest of the thread. White Man is my hero
 
J

Juicy Bob

Member
So, a 'White Man' enforces his will over the populace because he doesn't approve of how other people discuss their sex life?

This is the most meta social commentary thread since PigSpeakers's infamous 'News Story' thread.

I like what you're doing White Man please don't ban me
 
N

NotTheGuyYouKill

Member
Juicy Bob said:
So, a 'White Man' enforces his will over the populace because he doesn't approve of how other people discuss their sex life?

This is the most meta social commentary thread since PigSpeakers's infamous 'News Story' thread.

I like what you're doing White Man please don't ban me
Click to expand...

John+Eliot+Preaching.jpg
 
A

Ampersands

Member
I was reading through the thread for the first time and was disappointed to see OP was banned for presumably making it all up. But then I see he posted pics and everything. Did not see that coming.
 
G

Gemüsepizza

Member
I guess he was banned because a mod didn't saw his picture, despite it being posted 3 times on the same page. Some people joked that he was banned because he did *not* post nude pictures... at least I hope they were joking.
 
M

mullet2000

Member
I think the idea that shitty relationship threads will be cracked down on more is a good one (even if I morbidly enjoy them) but do you guys really think the notion that a mod will ask for proof of something for a poster to avoid a ban, that person can post proof, and then he/she gets banned anyway is a good one?

If he had just been banned out right after new rules had been posted not to post shitty relationship threads (and described what that means) then that's totally fair. But when a mod, as a person of authority, asks for proof of something to avoid a ban I'd like to think he/she's telling the truth, being fair, and is not just messing with me. I want to think that he/she isn't just going to ban me anyway, which seems to be (please correct me if I'm wrong) what happened in this thread.

I just want to be clear what these 'new rules' are. I don't want to get banned because I can't verify any comment/thread I might make about my sex life/romantic life with photographic evidence, or get banned because a mod deems my story to be too shitty when I don't know where the line for that is.
 
D

Deleted member 10571

Unconfirmed Member
mullet kinda has a point there, yes. This thread turned out strangely.
 
R

Raiden

Banned
Aw man i kinda feel for the OP, even if his story was true it might be pretty awkward to get a picture of everyone together .. how do you explain that to them?
 
R

RedShift

Member
mullet2000 said:
I think the idea that shitty relationship threads will be cracked down on more is a good one (even if I morbidly enjoy them) but do you guys really think the notion that a mod will ask for proof of something for a poster to avoid a ban, that person can post proof, and then he/she gets banned anyway is a good one?

If he had just been banned out right after new rules had been posted not to post shitty relationship thread (and described what that means) then that's totally fair. But when a mod, as a person of authority, asks for proof of something to avoid a ban I'd like to think he/she's telling the truth, being fair, and is not just messing with me. I want to think that he/she isn't just going to ban me anyway, which seems to be (please correct me if I'm wrong) what happened in this thread.

I just want to be clear what's these 'new rules' are. I don't want to get banned because I can't verify any comment/thread I might make about my sex life/romance with photographic evidence, or get banned because a mod deems my story to be too shitty when I don't know where the line for that is.
Click to expand...

Yeah this does seem pretty fair.

If you're going to ban someone ban them, but it's a bit harsh to make them post pictures of themselves and their threesome buddies beforehand and tell them if they do they won't get banned.
 
D

DoktorEvil

Banned
mullet2000 said:
I think the idea that shitty relationship threads will be cracked down on more is a good one (even if I morbidly enjoy them) but do you guys really think the notion that a mod will ask for proof of something for a poster to avoid a ban, that person can post proof, and then he/she gets banned anyway is a good one?

If he had just been banned out right after new rules had been posted not to post shitty relationship thread (and described what that means) then that's totally fair. But when a mod, as a person of authority, asks for proof of something to avoid a ban I'd like to think he/she's telling the truth, being fair, and is not just messing with me. I want to think that he/she isn't just going to ban me anyway, which seems to be (please correct me if I'm wrong) what happened in this thread.

I just want to be clear what's these 'new rules' are. I don't want to get banned because I can't verify any comment/thread I might make about my sex life/romance with photographic evidence, or get banned because a mod deems my story to be too shitty when I don't know where the line for that is.
Click to expand...

Has anyone ever clarified what are bannable offenses? Is it solely breaking the ToS?

OP was asked for proof, verified it, and was banned as a result? Not fair at all, especially to the posters that follow these threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

What are some bad decisions you were going to make but thankfully didn’t?
31
1K
Liljagare replied
UK Woman has her Laptop seized by Police over NSFW Skyrim Mods
Drama Event 2
58
8K
Cyberpunkd replied
Jeff Bezos x Lauren Sanchez having $600 million Christmas wedding in Aspen
2
68
4K
Unknown Soldier replied
Talk Tuah with Haliey Welch is a Top 10 podcast
2 3
144
8K
EviLore replied
Not So Merry Christmas
2
99
5K
Darkmakaimura replied
Top Bottom