The 100 is a genre show that’s essentially about survival. Virtually every other time a character has been written out, they’ve been killed – because there’s not really much else to do with them. This is the show that killed off it’s cisgender, heterosexual, male lead – and NOT because the actor got a bigger role on a bigger show, as was the case here.
The entire reaction to this saga boils down to shippers reaching their hardest to find some kind of moral highground, so they can pretend their outrage comes from some kind of injustice to the LGBTQ viewership and NOT their own over-investment in a fictional couple. That’s why when they got called the holes in their logic, they shifted to “well it’s not THAT she died, it’s how she died”.
Not every LGBTQ death on TV that happens falls into “Bury Your Gays”. If that were the case, we wouldn’t be asking for equality – we’d be asking for preferential treatment. The criticism from GLAAD here (that many gay characters are dying to support the narrative of the straight characters) misses the forest through the trees: It’s not that they’re killing them off, it’s that they’re not casting them as leads. Supporting characters die on genre shows all the time. Those are straight characters, gay characters, black characters, old characters – on and on.
These showrunners aren’t sitting there thinking “well, time to off the lesbian!”, they’re thinking that these characters are ALL disposible by nature and their deaths serve the plot, which is written around the starring
cast.
So the real thing you should be asking TV producers isn’t “stop burying the gays”, it’s “start casting the gays as the protagonists” – because the few places we do have minorities in lead roles, they are as safe as houses.