• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Alan Wake 2 on PlayStation 5 Pro – Behind The Scenes

It still needs a 40fps mode. It needed one on the base consoles and it should have one here. A 40fps mode with a lower internal resolution but with the ray-tracing of quality mode would be a nice addition.

40 FPS is a big jump from 30 FPS and should honestly be the minimum for gaming.
 

Xtib81

Member
The perf mode doesn't look too hot. Even with the little they show, shimmering is pretty visible. Looks like a lazy patch.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
every PC. the game only has a toggle for each effect, no granular adjustments.

if I read the info they gave correctly, the BVH is reinged in and updates slower compared to PC.

a 3070 beats this. if you want to know specifics.

but even then you can't compare this as the PS5 Pro version gets a lower quality RT reflection setting than what's even possible to enable on PC

It sounds like you are simply saying that PC has more settings available. That's fine, but you can't make comparisons like this without knowing how it impacts performance.
 

ChiefDada

Gold Member
Tell it to the OP. I’m just going by what is there.

You are saying they both render at ~800p?

The internal resolution profiles for PS5 and PS5 Pro respective modes are virtually identical. The biggest difference is trading FSR 2 out for PSSR and specifically for Performance mode, boosting the output resolution from 1440p to 4k. It should be a very tangible IQ difference between base vs Pro performance modes.

 
At 860p, there is no way the pro can match the image clarity of the fidelity mode even with a bad upscaler like FSR2.

The actual developers of the game disagree...

Performance Mode 

The Performance Mode on the PS5 Pro features significantly higher output resolution and has more visual detail compared to the base PS5. The Pro Performance mode uses approximately the same image quality (render) settings as the base PS5’s Quality mode.

The overall image stability, fog, volumetric lighting, and shadow accuracy have been improved on the Pro.

  • 60fps
  • Using approximately the same render (image quality) settings as the base PS5 Quality mode.
  • Base PS5 Performance mode version runs at lower render (image quality) settings
  • Render resolution 1536 x 864
  • Output resolution 3840 x 2160 (4K)
  • Base PS5 version outputs 1440p.
 
Last edited:

kevboard

Member
It sounds like you are simply saying that PC has more settings available. That's fine, but you can't make comparisons like this without knowing how it impacts performance.

that is now what I'm saying. what I'm saying is that the RT reflections they use in the Pro version are lower than what you can set them to on PC.
on PC it's an on/off switch for reflections, which render at a set quality that you can not change.

the PS5 Pro version reduces the BVH radius and update rate (probably also runs half-res). something you can not do on PC. meaning RT reflections as seen on PC are far more demanding.

if you only enable RT reflections and you targeted 30fps with optimised settings, you should be able to match this on a 3070.
 
Last edited:

Killer8

Member
They made the right call focusing on ray-traced reflections. There are a lot of bodies of water and reflective surfaces in Alan Wake 2 so it provides the biggest bang for buck as far as visual improvements go.

From what I remember of Digital Foundry's path-tracing PC breakdown, the lighting improvements it offers is pretty subtle and they blend it with the rasterized lighting system anyway. You don't get the generational leap you get with Cyberpunk 2077's path-tracing.

It also brings a 4070 to its knees at 1440p even with DLSS.
 

Radical_3d

Member
Wrong. Base PS5 was roughly same internal res as PS5 Pro with a 1440p output. PS5 Pro is using PSSR to reach a 4k output in it's new performance mode.
Wrong again. Base PS5 has less internal resolution upscaled to 1.440p. Jesus, it’s in the summary people. It isn’t that hard!
 

Kangx

Member from Brazile
The actual developers of the game disagree...

Performance Mode 

The Performance Mode on the PS5 Pro features significantly higher output resolution and has more visual detail compared to the base PS5. The Pro Performance mode uses approximately the same image quality (render) settings as the base PS5’s Quality mode.

The overall image stability, fog, volumetric lighting, and shadow accuracy have been improved on the Pro.

  • 60fps
  • Using approximately the same render (image quality) settings as the base PS5 Quality mode.
  • Base PS5 Performance mode version runs at lower render (image quality) settings
  • Render resolution 1536 x 864
  • Output resolution 3840 x 2160 (4K)
  • Base PS5 version outputs 1440p.
It uses the same image quality render setting, I presume this is mostly graphic setting, effects and post processing.

What I am worrying is image clarity/blurriness. Usually, lower internal res will not eliminate shimmering and I see really bad example in the 30sec performance clip.
 

Killer8

Member
Too much you want. Here is lower resolution,, than on PS5 pro. Even XTX and 4070 can't give 60 fps
cb5fc7223cbb39650d8a94150847b3ab.png

Bear in mind that DLSS quality at 1440p means it's using a base resolution of 960p compared to the Pro's 1224p prior to the PSSR pass.

There's a reason it's dropping some of the other ray-tracing effects and is shooting for only 30fps.
 

kevboard

Member
How do you know this?

read the article by Remedy that they posted.

the RT reflections are half res CBR.
the BHV updates anything that isn't a character at half rate or lower (depending on distance), distant objects are culled from the BVH, and light sources are culled based on some parameters that determine if they are important.

on PC the BHV updates at full rate and I'm pretty sure the reflections are full resolution. culling is also not as aggressive on PC.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
That's an extremely low resolution to upscale to 4K with. Lower than DLSS's Performance Mode.

Alan Wake 2 DLSS performance mode should be a good comparison against PS5 Pro performance mode. But it should be noted that this is simply Remedy's decision to leave the render resolution the same as quality mode and add more visual details.

It would be interesting to know what the render resolution required for PS5 Pro performance mode would be minus those visual enhancements.
 

Mahavastu

Member
Of course they can use the 60 CUs if they are patched specifically for this machine

That's the point of patching the game
what I would like to know is if an unpatched game can use the full number of CUs.
In the end it would "only" require some kind of "giveMeNumberOfCus()" function to enable this. No idea if this exists...
 

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
what I would like to know is if an unpatched game can use the full number of CUs.
In the end it would "only" require some kind of "giveMeNumberOfCus()" function to enable this. No idea if this exists...
No, on Sony's consoles you target certain version of SDK, which means that unpatched version does not have access to whole HW, this is to prevent some kernel panics, when you do some whacky stuff, which you can on PS. But you can still benefit from improved overall HW, like better memory system, more CPU power, etc.
 

Mister Wolf

Member
Alan Wake 2 DLSS performance mode should be a good comparison against PS5 Pro performance mode. But it should be noted that this is simply Remedy's decision to leave the render resolution the same as quality mode and add more visual details.

It would be interesting to know what the render resolution required for PS5 Pro performance mode would be minus those visual enhancements.

I wouldn't be surprised if Alex uses that DLSS mod to force the same internal resolution or uses DLSS 4K Ultra Performance(720p) to prove a point.
 

HeWhoWalks

Gold Member
Pathtracing though? The PC version has this! If it was mentioned, my apologies!

If it matches the PC's graphics, I'm double dippin'!
 
Top Bottom