He made the best movie of the HP saga.
I know he did Prisoner of Azkaban
The dude should have free reign to make pretty much anything at this point and he's going to do this dreck?
Oh god please don't waste your talents on this garbage, Alfonso.
The dude should have free reign to make pretty much anything at this point and he's going to do this dreck?
It's a spinoff short story that Rowling has literally been convinced by an exec to write in return for an immeasurable sum to extend into a feature-length. It is the definition of cash cow entertainment. And Cuaron is better than that.It's one thing to be skeptical for whatever reason, but labeling it as "dreck" at this point?
Also money on the first five minutes having more substance than the entirety of Gravity.
It's a spinoff short story that Rowling has literally been convinced by an exec to write in return for an immeasurable sum to extend into a feature-length. It is the definition of cash cow entertainment.
It's a spinoff short story that Rowling has literally been convinced by an exec to write in return for an immeasurable sum to extend into a feature-length. It is the definition of cash cow entertainment. And Cuaron is better than that.
I'd rather see him move back toward thoughtful films like Children of Men than this trash.
It's a spinoff short story that Rowling has literally been convinced by an exec to write in return for an immeasurable sum to extend into a feature-length. It is the definition of cash cow entertainment. And Cuaron is better than that.
I'd rather see him move back toward thoughtful films like Children of Men than this trash.
Maybe his weakest film.People should watch this one too, it's a great way to appreciate Cuaron talent without huge budgets or special effects:
![]()
Cuaron returning for a Harry Potter universe story that has none of the baggage and can just explore the universe and depict all the crazy shit in it would be FUCKING AMAZING
It's funny because somepeople in Mexico hate "Y tu mamá también" it was saw as a cliché road movie without any sense. But to be honest filmaking in Mexico can be awful, there's so much bad blood between directors and actors and to get things worse it seems that every critic there expects a masterpiece with deep social comment with every single movie, Salma Hayek's Frida had the same problems.Maybe his weakest film.
Y Tu Mama Tambien is what people ought to check out. I'm typing that title from memory, so apologies for typos. I never get it right.
Apparently a lot of people, including film critics can. I can turn that around and say aaah how can anyone think this, they were so good!
The genesis of the idea is a throw away tie-in book for kids. There isn't really a story which anyone particularly wanted to tell or a great idea which would make a film.
They had continuity issues and omitted some truly excellent scenes from the books.
Maybe his weakest film.
Y Tu Mama Tambien is what people ought to check out. I'm typing that title from memory, so apologies for typos. I never get it right.
God no as much as I like Gravity and Children of Men I fooking hate POA, easily my least favourite of the Potter films.
He made the best movie of the HP saga.
Does Fantastic Beasts... even have a plot? Sirius question
I saw him give a presentation a few weeks before the Oscars and he spoke extremely highly of working with JK Rowling. In addition, David Heyman produced Gravity as well as all of the Harry Potter movies. This would not be a huge surprise if it happens and would easily be the best possible choice for WB.
Is there a release date scheduled for this movie yet?
I didn't have any gripes about the continuity and I don't give a shit when things are omitted from the source material as long as the story is there. They usually get in what's important and are executed well enough. That's all I personally ask for.
The bit where we're with Harry the whole time and nobody tells him Tonks is pregnant and he suddenly knows about it, when the audience has no clue. Really lame. Also, completely missing Dumbledore's backstory out, which I thought was pretty important.
... off the top of my head. Like I said in another thread, Yates' Potter movies are literally just a handful of scenes from the book put onto screen (plus unnecessary additions), with no care whatsoever put on whether it all makes sense on its own without having read the books.
I would be really disappointed if this is really his next project. We can debate all day whether this will end up being a good film or not, but that doesn't change the fact that creatively this is a film that really only exists because there's someone putting a lot of money on the table. The genesis of the idea is a throw away tie-in book for kids. There isn't really a story which anyone particularly wanted to tell or a great idea which would make a film. If it ends up being any good, it will be due to the talent the money attracted. Talent who could be doing other more interesting ideas born naturally and creatively, instead in a studio meeting room.