Delayed reaction. Simply revealing information to people won't necessarily spark immediate change/action (contingent upon the manner with which it was revealed), but overtime it will start to permeate the culture and take root.Hm. Well, we'll see how this is interpreted. Even if it comes out as fact with gobs of evidence, alot of people will die believing it isn't true. They're already picked their version of reality and nothing will alter that.
Delayed reaction. Simply revealing information to people won't necessarily spark immediate change/action (contingent upon the manner with which it was revealed), but overtime it will start to permeate the culture and take root.
I think the timeline will be a bit quicker for a few reasons:Yes, and I'm thinking for something of this magnitude, many young people now will need to grow old and die. I think for the majority to accept it, they will need to be born in a world where the evidence is available for them to make an educated choice. It'll be a "choice" to believe for decades, even after the scientific community accepts it as fact.
I'm thinking even if it comes out as fact, huge conspiracy groups will form that are basically religions for people who don't want to believe it, and be an outlet for human psychological fragility. "Political distraction!"
I'm thinking even if it comes out as fact, huge conspiracy groups will form that are basically religions for people who don't want to believe it, and be an outlet for human psychological fragility. "Political distraction!"
They already exist. Ever since the US government declassified those videos, groups of people have been creating new conspiracies on how this is a "false flag" by the US government to get more military funding. It's as nonsense as believing the world is flat, or humans have never been to the moon. Complete loony bin nonsense.
For years people were saying the US government are holding back information about UFOs, but as soon as the US government becomes more open, people just turn it into a new conspiracy because they're original belief is now mainstream.
Holy shit.Stanford Professor Garry Nolan Is Analyzing Anomalous Materials From UFO Crashes
A Q&A with one of the foremost scientists studying UAPs, and what he hopes to learn by systematically studying bizarre and difficult-to-explain incidents.www.vice.com
"One of the materials from the so called Ubatuba event [a UAP event in Brazil], has extraordinarily altered isotope ratios of magnesium. It was interesting because another piece from the same event was analyzed in the same instrument at the same time. This is an extraordinarily sensitive instrument called a nanoSIMS - Secondary Ion Mass Spec. It had perfectly correct isotope ratios for what you would expect for magnesium found anywhere on Earth. Meanwhile, the other one was just way off. Like 30 percent off the ratios. The problem is there's no good reason humans have for altering the isotope ratios of a simple metal like magnesium. There's no different properties of the different isotopes, that anybody, at least in any of the literature that is public of the hundreds of thousands of papers published, that says this is why you would do that. Now you can do it. It's a little expensive to do, but you'd have no reason for doing it. "
So one of these objects is unstable. It spits out a bunch of stuff. Now it's stable and it takes off. It looks like it fixed itself. It's almost as if this is part of the mechanism for moving around, and when things get out of whack, it has to offload it. It just drops this stuff to the ground, kind of like the exhaust. That begs the question: what are they using it for? If there's altered isotope ratios, are they using the altered isotope ratios? Are these the result of the propulsion? The result of the propulsion is to change the ratios. When the ratios get that far out of whack, they have to offload because it's no longer useful in propulsion. Smarter people than me will come up with better reasons."
Stanford Professor Garry Nolan Is Analyzing Anomalous Materials From UFO Crashes
A Q&A with one of the foremost scientists studying UAPs, and what he hopes to learn by systematically studying bizarre and difficult-to-explain incidents.www.vice.com
"One of the materials from the so called Ubatuba event [a UAP event in Brazil], has extraordinarily altered isotope ratios of magnesium. It was interesting because another piece from the same event was analyzed in the same instrument at the same time. This is an extraordinarily sensitive instrument called a nanoSIMS - Secondary Ion Mass Spec. It had perfectly correct isotope ratios for what you would expect for magnesium found anywhere on Earth. Meanwhile, the other one was just way off. Like 30 percent off the ratios. The problem is there's no good reason humans have for altering the isotope ratios of a simple metal like magnesium. There's no different properties of the different isotopes, that anybody, at least in any of the literature that is public of the hundreds of thousands of papers published, that says this is why you would do that. Now you can do it. It's a little expensive to do, but you'd have no reason for doing it. "
So one of these objects is unstable. It spits out a bunch of stuff. Now it's stable and it takes off. It looks like it fixed itself. It's almost as if this is part of the mechanism for moving around, and when things get out of whack, it has to offload it. It just drops this stuff to the ground, kind of like the exhaust. That begs the
So you question his expertise. Even if his reference to nanoSIMS was off, I guess I'm not sure what you're implying about his statements.That is not really how nanoSIMS works though, so this entire section doesn't make much sense.
Nano-SIMS analysis of Mg, Sr, Ba and U in natural calcium carbonate - PubMed
Concentrations of minor (Mg and Sr) and trace (Ba and U) elements in four natural calcium carbonate samples were first analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after chemical dissolution and calibrated against a standard dolomite. Their homogeneities were checked by in...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
So you question his expertise. Even if his reference to nanoSIMS was off, I guess I'm not sure what you're implying about his statements.
Beyond, of course, you think it's laughable.
Of course.No, it's simply incorrect, and, not at all how it works.
Where can I listen to this?Anybody listen to the new BBC podcast Uncanny? It's a paranormal podcast where a BBC journalist interviews people who claim to have experienced a paranormal experience. The BBC then do some digging and speak to sceptics and "paranormal experts" to try and uncover the truth.
The reason I bring this up is because they had two episodes based on a UFO experience in Yorkshire back in the 1980s. In the second part of the podcast, the BBC unearthed some mind-bending evidence of the Yorkshire UFO experience that blew my mind.
Definitely worth checking out.
I suspect he's talking about this https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0011bgyWhere can I listen to this?
Thanks!I suspect he's talking about this https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0011bgy
have to be honest, seems like a crock of bs to me but hey ho. Yorkshire folk are weird.
Thanks!
There was an unsolved mysteries episode about this, wasn't there?
Indeed. TLDR, a body was found with a strange green fluid on it in the yorkshire dales somewhere IIRC they tested it and the lab results were basically that it was a substance unknown to anyone in the scientific world during the 1980s. months later a police officer whitnessed a craft near the area and under hypnosis remembered an abduction.
Thanks!
There was an unsolved mysteries episode about this, wasn't there?
Indeed. TLDR, a body was found with a strange green fluid on it in the yorkshire dales somewhere IIRC they tested it and the lab results were basically that it was a substance unknown to anyone in the scientific world during the 1980s. months later a police officer whitnessed a craft near the area and under hypnosis remembered an abduction.
and master of the shell suit don't forget.Ah, David Icke. Possibly the world's number one grifter.
Some quotes about the Roswell incident.
“I am completely convinced that the object that crashed near Roswell was composed of materials not common on Earth.”
Major General Kenner Hertford, Deputy Commander, Armed Forces Special Weapons Project; Research and Development Division in Army General Staff
“They knew that they had something new in their hands. The metal and material was unknown to anyone I talked to… The overall consensus was that the pieces were from space.”
Brigadier General Arthur E. Exon, U.S.A.F. (ret.), former base commander Wright Patterson AFB
“There is not much we can do about Roswell. I tried diligently to get them [files] from General LeMay and it was the only cussing out he ever gave me.”
Major General Barry Goldwater, Arizona Senator; 1964 Republican Presidential nominee
“It [Roswell] was the biggest lie I ever had to tell… [It was] out of this world.”
Major General Roger Ramey, U.S.A.F. (ret.)
“If I ever told you the truth of what happened at Roswell, you would never see life in the same way again.”
General Robert Broussard Landry, U.S.A.F., personal aide to President Harry Truman
“Roswell is true. The problem — It’s buried deep within the black budget, and government funds have been spent since 1947 to keep the truth from coming out.”
Dick D’ Amato, Navy Reserve Captain (ret.); Senior Senatorial Counsel to Senator Robert C. Byrd
“At least this effort [GAO report on Roswell] caused the Air Force to acknowledge that the crashed vehicle was no weather balloon.”
Steven Schiff, former New Mexico congressman representing Roswell
“It was a cover story, the balloon part… we were told to give to the public.”
Brigadier General Thomas J. DuBose, U.S.A.F. (ret.)
“The [Roswell] craft was extraterrestrial…and at one time may have been at Wright Patterson [Air Force Base] in an off-limits area.”
Brigadier General Harry Cordes, U.S.A.F. (ret.)
It could trigger an arms race, buck the current status quo. It might have been better to quietly sit on it, even if hostile nations had their suspicions there's no cause to overtly act on their part. No pressure.That's a lot of quotes from reputable people. Some might call it pretty clear evidence that Roswell was in fact a craft from another world.
Considering all the above quotes, one would then question why the US government still denies that it was just a weather balloon? Why not just come clean?
In data from the Kepler mission, the normal F3V star KIC 8462852 (Boyajian's star) was observed to exhibit infrequent dips in brightness that have not been satisfactorily explained. A previous paper reported the first results of a search for other similar stars in a limited region of the sky around the Kepler field. This paper expands on that search to cover the entire sky between declinations of +22 degrees and +68 degrees. Fifteen new candidates with low rates of dipping, referred to as "slow dippers" in Paper I, have been identified. The dippers occupy a limited region of the HR diagram and an apparent clustering in space is found. This latter feature suggests that these stars are attractive targets for SETI searches.
That's a lot of quotes from reputable people. Some might call it pretty clear evidence that Roswell was in fact a craft from another world.
Considering all the above quotes, one would then question why the US government still denies that it was just a weather balloon? Why not just come clean?
I think what's happening is disclosure. It's not what many people were expecting or demanding, but it's here all the same.Disclosure ?
yea, to the point of insulting people saying they had screws loose.Wasn't this dude a super skeptic not long ago?
If I were an alien and observed the people of earth, I’d laugh and turn my UFO around, never returning until the earth was cleansed of the human race.