Those will get your account banned right away.1st thing I thought of during the reveal of the 'C' button and group chat with the camera.........how many dick and tits pics will be showing up
....not to mention racist crap and drugs.
I'm talking about using it to Superimpose a overlay of yourself in party games.It looks like the camera can only be used in an existing chat can't it? Like njt randoms.
If switch 2 can run games ar 120 fps portable... i want to see a VR headset addon with pancake lenses.
yes I was hoping to see this somewhere by the end of the presentation, disappointedIf switch 2 can run games ar 120 fps portable... i want to see a VR headset addon with pancake lenses.
I thought the same thing... they even designed the switch to stand straight up in the dock, which is rare, and the top pops out over the dock. Only other dock I know that stands vertically for any handheld gaming device is the analogue pocket others are at an angle.They should have incorporated the camera in to the top bezzle of the console like on a phone and had it able to activate when the Switch is docked.
That way everyone has one and there's no dildo sat next to the Switch with a wire sticking out.
The camera makes it very cumbersome and removes the ease of docking in and out.
You're assuming people are firstly going to buy the £400 console and then the £50 camera on top and then another £50+ for these games.
The Switch's price point was always a huge factor in its success alongside it being revolutionary for the handheld space.
This has neither of those two selling points. Just pushed a lot of casuals and families away immediately.
They should have forced the camera into the box and called it Switch One
You don't remember the Wii Fit Balance Board or the Motion+ add-ons?yeah, it's just not happening.
OP is saying this is gonna be like the Wii... this is like the Wii, but you'd have to pay an extra $80 for wiimote, not even included in the box.
Again, it's just not gonna happen like it is in OP head.
Do I remember them? I still use them regularly. Wii was lightning in a bottle, something brand new. There is nothing new or innovative here.You don't remember the Wii Fit Balance Board or the Motion+ add-ons?
Also this is Nintendo they will release a new model with the camera built in when the price is right.
Nintendo has the user-base for it lol Xbox was attempting to steal that user-base while disowning their own.They should have forced the camera into the box and called it Switch One
Of course it's not revolutionary I had Eyetoy , PlayStation Eye , Kinect & PlayStation Move but the thing is this is Nintendo they will make the right games to show it off & they have the right user-base for it so even 3rd party devs will use the features.Do I remember them? I still use them regularly. Wii was lightning in a bottle, something brand new. There is nothing new or innovative here.
Built-in or not, it's welcomed, but revolutionary it is not.
Thing about the wii and how it gained such widespread appeal wasn't because of the existing userbase/fans. It was the parents, grandparents and children all co-mingling. No way an optional photo in existing game genres can do the same thing. This is not even debateable imo.Of course it's not revolutionary I had Eyetoy , PlayStation Eye , Kinect & PlayStation Move but the thing is this is Nintendo they will make the right games to show it off & they have the right user-base for it so even 3rd party devs will use the features.
Wii U kinda put themselves in the way of danger by seeming like a tablet that was pigeonholed as a console controller.Thing about the wii and how it gained such widespread appeal wasn't because of the existing userbase/fans. It was the parents, grandparents and children all co-mingling. No way an optional photo in existing game genres can do the same thing. This is not even debateable imo.
Unless a peripheral is included in the box, then is has no chance of getting games that uses it to max of capabilities. Even when it's in the box, it's not guaranteed to be successful.
Look at the Wii U gamepad... it was crap for dual-screen gaming, having to look up and down all the time. We've had cameras for years, we know what we're getting. Yes, some fun can be had with the right software, but I genuinely feel that nintendo don't see it as a gaming-controller-redux, but more as a simple communication device and slight enhancement to existing games. Maybe a few eshop games will be made for it that requires the camera, but that's it.
If they were going all-out on the camera... they'd do so from launch, not mid-generation.
This is all speculation though. We'll see in time.
Wii times are never coming back.When these little party games get pulled out at social gatherings & over the holidays it's over it's going to be Wii all over again.
Sounds promising, let's just hope the camera can share more frame per second than what we saw when using video chat. That was maybe 5 to 10 image per second.When these little party games get pulled out at social gatherings & over the holidays it's over it's going to be Wii all over again.