duckroll said:I do not believe this to be accurate to be honest. I know they used that as a selling point early in the game (actually I think Chris Parker did), but Avellone later clarified that it was not really their intention for each stance to be a specific character type. Instead, there is only one "character type" in Alpha Protocol - Mike Thornton.
The casual/suave/flirting/etc response locked to the X button is basically the dick response, The Y button response is the angry response, and the B button is the by the books response. In many of these cases, they are not something that James Bond, Jack Bauer, or Jason Bourne would ever say. It's not really about character type so much as an emotional response based on Thornton's personality.
The personality that Avellone has given Thornton is obviously that of a generally sarcastic dick who is pretty confident of himself. Most of the professional responses are written such that even the voice direction seems to indicate he is only tolerating the situation for the sake of the mission. Thornton is most natural when he has the upper hand and is sounding all confident and in control. I think it would not be fair to say the character was simply written to present 3 different other character outlets for players, because it's clearly not the case.
I am going to have to disagree a little on this.
While it is true that the different choices are not meant to mirror what the JBs would do, they do very much represent what each character basically is (so their general stances).
Think about it.
Reduce these (somewhat complex) characters into single words and you find that:
Bourne is indeed a consummate professional (to a fault)
Bond is suave/slick rogue(perhaps too slick...)
Bauer is pretty aggressive/precipitous (in short, he is a Jerk).
And then in situations where the above do not apply, you usually get synonyms, or words that one could reasonably associate with them.
I think the existence of the JBs definately influenced the way the stance system--and the game--were set up, though obviously not the content.