this is so stupid, I am not even from the USA but if this goes through, I am pretty sure other countries will look into that bullshit too
So according to Senator Waters, any arguments against this bill is a waste of time and that they should move forward. This is ridiculous.
99% of people don't even know this is happening, nor do they know what it would do if enacted.
Also, Idol's on or some shit
How are Americans not rioting?
this is so stupid, I am not even from the USA but if this goes through, I am pretty sure other countries will look into that bullshit too
it is an absolute tragedy that this thread contains so few posts.
This is one of those really really rare times where a bombastic thread title is absolutely necessary.
Fixed that for you. Still in the House.
Why the fuck are they arguing about the word "offensive"??? WTF?
This is like a fucking circus! They're arguing over a fucking word! Arrrrgggghhhh >_<I have no idea what is going on.
I'm all for them shutting down torrent and pirate sites. As long as there is some sort of verification process, and appeal process, I'm OK with it.
It's not all that different from shutting down a street vendor in New York who sells counterfeit Nike shoes, etc.
This is like a fucking circus! They're arguing over a fucking word! Arrrrgggghhhh >_<
I'm all for them shutting down torrent and pirate sites. As long as there is some sort of verification process, and appeal process, I'm OK with it.
It's not all that different from shutting down a street vendor in New York who sells counterfeit Nike shoes, etc.
I look forward to the internet rage when they shut down popular pirate sites. lol
NO BUT THEY'RE NOT STEALING THEY'RE JUST COPYING IT'S LIKE FREE ADVERTISEMENT Y'ALL! Entertainment companies have a right to protect their revenues streams and their copyrighted products. This is not the way to go about it.
Also, thanks to you nerds and your filesharing, you won't get as many nerd-skewing shows. Thanks nerds.
I am completely opposed to SOPA. I think it could lead to a terrible precedent.
That being said - People who oppose SOPA because you want to torrent and file share products that you don't own: go fuck yourself. You don't have a fucking right to pirate copyrighted material and hijacking a legitimate debate because you want to continue to squander creativity in the entertainment industry is extremely dangerous.
/ivysaur's message to those on the internetwho are using this debate not on its merits of censorship but instead for their own personal interests.reddit, 4chan
What is wrong with the way they're going about it?
pirate sites, yes
torrents? no
Pirates(those who are leaking copyrighted materials) are smart enough to just get around this shit. It's just gonna ruin the internet for the rest of us.
This bill is way too overreaching and I'm extremely uncomfortable with the federal government and its entities having the ability to block out websites that do host user generated content. I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist and I tend to think that people use slippery slope arguments too much in civil debate, but I'm chilled by the effects of what this legislation could do to sites like Google, Wikipedia, Youtube, etc. There are legitimate reasons to oppose this beyond the fact that it would stop people from being able to torrent and file share.
That being said, I'm opposed to people who believe there is a right to pirate content that they do not have license to. On other (larger) boards, they've hijacked the debate and create a hive mentality of circle jerking to the threat of big brother trying to stop them from downloading the latest episode of Community.
Pirates(those who are leaking copyrighted materials) are smart enough to just get around this shit. It's just gonna ruin the internet for the rest of us.
Wait, what did they just vote on?
wait what are they tallying up...?
22 No's
YESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How often are torrents used for legal purposes? I can think of exactly one example I experienced where they distributed some stuff for the launch of Star Trek: Online
Rep. Watt: "We don't need experts. People on both sides have enough money and influence to figure this one out".
He said that...out of his own mouth.
Rep. Watt: "We don't need experts. People on both sides have enough money and influence to figure this one out".
He said that...out of his own mouth.
He LITERALLY, word for word, said that during an argument about why they need to bring experts in to answer questions about the bill.I had to go away for a bit, did he literally say that?
Looks like the amendment they're talking about now covers similar things.That's bad. That was Rep. Issa from CA's amendment trying to remove the DNS and search provisions of the bill.
That's barely a step above arguing "You're stupid" and sticking your fingers in your ears while shouting "la la la la la."He LITERALLY, word for word, said that during an argument about why they need to bring experts in to answer questions about the bill.