LookAtMeGo
Member
I love the baconator.I'm outraged at this blatant disregard for the autonomy of such amazing animals, our majestic cousins. They should put this guy in prison. *takes giant chomp out of baconator*
I love the baconator.I'm outraged at this blatant disregard for the autonomy of such amazing animals, our majestic cousins. They should put this guy in prison. *takes giant chomp out of baconator*
What type of enjoyment is it that you derive from killing an animal? Genuine question. I just can't imagine I'd feel any joy at all even if I had to kill to 'survive' let alone just to earn a trophy like the hunters I look at in the photos which always accompany these threads, with their crazy, shit-eating grins, spooning carcasses, their pants moist with pre-cum. Is it the feeling of a job well done or the satisfaction of knowing that in a zombie apocalypse kind of scenario, you would probably fare better than others?
It's weird that most headlines I've seen are referring to the lion by name. Was this some kind of famous lion? Did anyone know its name before today?
id aruge the hunters i know enjoy the hunt over the taking of life.
if i eat a burger i dont enjoy the fact that the cow is dead but im not gonna cry over it im gonna eat this delicious burger ya know
And come one people, let's stop defending this guy. He paid $55,000 because he wanted that lion - it's no accident.
Killing an animal for sport/recreation is disgusting and vile.
The end goal of eating a burger isn't to kill an animal. The end goal there is to enjoy a meal, it's just that you find it completely inconsequential whether there was suffering involved in producing that meal. But the end goal to hunting is to kill an animal. When you're eating a burger you're not looking for harming, you're just indifferent toward it. Which is still bad, but not nearly as fucked up.
Who's defending him, exactly? They're defending hunting, not poaching. I don't agree with hunting but poaching is obviously worse.
From what I gathered, they have a protection area for animals to not be hunted. Around the area is fair game. Someone broke Cecil's collar and put him outside the protected area. So that means he would seem like fair game.So ? is it basically like luring a Lion say... out of Bronx Zoo and hunting it? Do we have protected sanctuaries in America? I know of animals on the endangered list and preservation areas but do we have a similar setup?
He went through a licensed Hunting Operation to obtain what he believed to be a legal license to hunt a lion. He did nothing wrong on his part legally, which is why the Tour Guide and the landowner are now sitting in jail and he is not.
The end goal of eating a burger isn't to kill an animal. The end goal there is to enjoy a meal, it's just that you find it completely inconsequential whether there was suffering involved in producing that meal. But the end goal to hunting is to kill an animal. When you're eating a burger you're not looking for harming, you're just indifferent toward it. Which is still bad, but not nearly as fucked up.
He went through a licensed Hunting Operation to obtain what he believed to be a legal license to hunt a lion. He did nothing wrong on his part legally, which is why the Tour Guide and the landowner are now sitting in jail and he is not.
Walter J. Palmer, 55, of Eden Prairie, a practicing dentist in Bloomington, issued a statement addressing the killing on July 1 of Cecil, which has sparked outrage around the globe.
I hired several professional guides, and they secured all proper permits, the statement read. To my knowledge, everything about this trip was legal and properly handled and conducted.
I had no idea that the lion I took was a known, local favorite, was collared and part of a study until the end of the hunt. I relied on the expertise of my local professional guides to ensure a legal hunt.
Palmer, who has on his record a conviction for poaching a bear in Wisconsin several years ago, said he has not been contacted by any authorities in Zimbabwe or the U.S. about his killing the lion, but added he will cooperate with investigators.
Again, I deeply regret that my pursuit of an activity I love and practice responsibly and legally resulted in the taking of this lion, the statement concluded.
And come one people, let's stop defending this guy. He paid $55,000 because he wanted that lion - it's no accident.
I think I've been pretty clear that I don't give a shit if he knew who or what the lion was or not. Ignorance is not an excuse. Period. Let me say this again - Ignorance is not an excuse. I don't care what the hunting place told him, I don't care what permits they said they had, I don't care. Just because you commit a crime in ignorance of the law (or in this case, someone told you it was OK) doesn't make you not culpable. Period.
You realize what he said is basically the exact picture I have been painting, right?I still say that ignorance is no NO excuse, but I'm good with this and I hope that he will learn to check shit out before he does another big game hunt.
You'd have to be pretty dense to think luring a lion out of a national park is on the up and up.
Are you certain the hunter is even aware of that? That's for the guide to know.
Again, the guide is in jail. The hunters who paid him for the hunt are not. There's a reason for that.
He's not in jail because if he were, they'd take a huge hit to their hunting industry.
To his credit, he's released a statement.
http://www.startribune.com/zimbabwe-2-to-appear-in-court-for-killing-cecil-the-lion/318828251/
I don't like it, but I appreciate that he's come out and said that "Hey, I did wrong. I'm sorry."
.
He's a rich cunt hunter, they're probably not.
Yes, you can find articles, pictures and videos on him before he was killed.
He was quite well known (not that overly well known worldwide like some famous celeb). As a lion that lived in the wild he was probably one of the most well known with many tourists wanting to get photos and videos of him just so they can say they saw him too.
He's a rich cunt hunter, they're probably not.
Nah. When I hunted the end-goal was to enjoy time with family, and sitting out in the woods appreciating the sights and sound. The meat, fur, and other useful parts it provided were all a bonus. And I did actually feel guilt for every animal I took. Some of the best hunts were those we came away empty handed.
So if someone went about killing the neighbourhood cats, decapitate them placing their heads on their wall (maybe make some pillows out of their skin), you wouldn't think they were a psycho? I'm pretty sure you'd be in the minority.
And come one people, let's stop defending this guy. He paid $55,000 because he wanted that lion - it's no accident.
What's amazing is that most everyone in here agrees. Hunters and non-hunters alike. Poaching is shitty.
Heh, I think you could always get that takeaway from camping too.
He's not in jail because if he were, they'd take a huge hit to their hunting industry.
To his credit, he's released a statement.
http://www.startribune.com/zimbabwe-2-to-appear-in-court-for-killing-cecil-the-lion/318828251/
I don't like it, but I appreciate that he's come out and said that "Hey, I did wrong. I'm sorry."
I still say that ignorance is no NO excuse, but I'm good with this and I hope that he will learn to check shit out before he does another big game hunt.
I just don't understand how shooting an animal dead doesn't fuck you up mentally. I freaked out when I almost ran over a cat while driving the other night. And that was entirely that little fucker's fault.
Are you certain the hunter is even aware of that? That's for the guide to know.
Again, the guide is in jail. The hunters who paid him for the hunt are not. There's a reason for that.
that should be the only take away of this. so many times poachiong goes unreported. now a debate on how to fight poaching should arise not a debate centered around hunting/ hate campaign against a dentist
I say treat him the same way he treated Cecil. It's the only choice.
So you think he knew who the lion was? Seems rather far fetched.
Actually there are many instances where that is not true, but I won't hold you not knowing that against you.
You realize what he said is basically the exact picture I have been painting, right?
You really think this statement is coming from his sense of guilt? More like out of pure necessity in the face of a mounting tidal wave of controversy.
There's no way in hell he wasn't aware of what he was doing-especially if he shelled out that much money. This fucker is basically saying "I"m sorry I was caught"
This guy will get what he deserve one day.
Some animal will fight back and eat him to death.
What do you propose?
Agree. Maybe we'll get there somewhere between page 7-10
If a neighborhood cat and an african lion were exactly the same in terms of how humans see and treat them (e.g., the culture of hunting), you would almost have a point.
Ban poacher...
Please feel free to prove me wrong. When is ignorance of something an excuse to let you off? And even if it is, how many of them involve the killing of sentient beings?
I just don't understand how shooting an animal dead doesn't fuck you up mentally. I freaked out when I almost ran over a cat while driving the other night. And that was entirely that little fucker's fault.
Cursory research of Hwange National Park would show that Cecil was its main attraction.
This piece of shit deserves an arrow shot up his ass.
I hope he fails as a dentist and goes bankrupt.
The end goal of hunting is not to kill an animal, it's to ensure that animal wasn't killed without reason and doesn't go unused. I would agree with you if people just shot animals and left them there, but that's just not how it works and would be really disrespectful to the animal. A deer still ends up on someone's plate. The only difference between that and a steak is how it was cultivated, and one could argue that near-instant death via rifle is a more humane way of doing it than holding it in place and cutting its throat.
This piece of shit deserves an arrow shot up his ass.
I hope he fails as a dentist and goes bankrupt.