ReturnOfTheRAT
Member
Did he turn black for the third picture?
I quickly saw a picture of him like that somewhere else and thought, "a black dentist kills endangered lions?"
Did he turn black for the third picture?
Guess I missed that part. Ugh, that's heartbreaking.Cecil now leaves behind a pride of lions, including females with whom he mated and 24 of his cubs. Those cubs, preservationists say, will now likely be killed by other lions.
He went through a licensed Hunting Operation to obtain what he believed to be a legal license to hunt a lion. He did nothing wrong on his part legally, which is why the Tour Guide and the landowner are now sitting in jail and he is not.
This is pure stupidity, tell yourself that if it makes you feel better but is complete bullshit.
I feel fine. I ain't the one that's mad in here.
Even if he didn't do anything wrong "legally", he still paid thousands of dollars to hunt endangered species for fun, not just this lion. That is some behavior that should be publicly vilified. I
So you truly believe he had no idea anything was amiss?
Do these hunts always start in a national park known for a famous lion?
Guess I missed that part. Ugh, that's heartbreaking
I feel fine. I ain't the one that's mad in here.
It cant have been legal because he killed a lion that was not legal to kill.If we take the only side of the story at face value sure. His people are saying it was done legally. Hope so. Baiting is gross.
I'm not mad, I just find it sad and pathetic that anyone could post something so ignorant and unintelligent.
I don't actually know for sure. But neither do you. What we do know, is that all of these things that were done illegally or did not happen were the responsibility of the business conducting the hunt, not the clients of that business.
I don't know shit about preservation and crap
can we not swoop in and save those cubs from getting killed by other lions? will it take a lot of money to shoot anything that moves with a tranquilizer and get them safely?
Its the natural order of things, another male will take over his pride kill the young and have his own children. Nothing can be done about this.
I'm not asking about legality.
I'm asking for your personal opinion.
I'm not asking about legality.
I'm asking for your personal opinion.
It started on our good friend Honest Trymore Ndlovu's land! What more due diligence do you need?
I have no reason to believe that he did anything wrong, nor the other hunters who were with them. They were on a guided hunt. Unless there was a big sign that says NOW ENTERING _______ STATE PARK DO NOT HUNT UNDER PENALTY etc. I have no reason to suspect that they knew something was amiss.
I don't know much about it myself, honestly, but I'm told there's nothing that can be done more often than not.I don't know shit about preservation and crap
can we not swoop in and save those cubs from getting killed by other lions? will it take a lot of money to shoot anything that moves with a tranquilizer and get them safely?
You truly don't think he knew where he was?
Apparently you'd be surprised.Well, in a country known for its rampant illegal poaching, I guess it sounds legit and I sure won't question a thing after paying $55,000 in cash. I'm gonna go take a nap in the car while you guys do your thing.
At least my posts make sense. Not ragelording and calling for people to get killed or imprisoned for life for shooting an animal.
Why do you think he was on the protected land? I haven't read anyone else claim that.
There's lots that can be done. The question is, will anyone?
It's a protected species, you'd think they'd try to at least move them to a new home.
It's in the second paragraph of the article posted in the OP.
Apparently you'd be surprised.
That the lion was lured out the preserve doesn't necessarily mean whoever did the luring was in the preserve.
There's lots that can be done. The question is, will anyone?
It's a protected species, you'd think they'd try to at least move them to a new home.
I think this starts falling under debates about the ethics of eating animals and that's not something I feel like going into in this thread (or generally online).How do you feel about people who "eat for taste", which most meat-eating (animal killing) falls under? Alternatively, they could sustain themselves on non-animal food (or at the very least fish and insects) and acquire the same nutrients.
It shouldn't be vilified by default. There have been legitimate reasons for the granting of a hunter's license for an endangered species. Last year someone paid over $350,000 to hunt a black rhino. But it was under the pretense that he could only hunt one very specific rhino. An old rhino that could no longer reproduce, and was overly aggressive to others. Also all that money went back into conservation efforts and they'd have had to put the rhino down regardless of whether it were a hunter or conservation agent.
Damn, this guy's Yelp page is getting flooded
http://www.yelp.com/biz/river-bluff-dental-bloomington?skip_bridge=true
I'd be surprised by the complete ignorance of the entitled? Nope, not really. I know not all of them are complete, abject sociopaths. Some of them are just plain ignorant.
Which is why I hope they still nail this guy to the wall, even if it proves he's merely incompetent and too trusting. Ignorance should no longer be an excuse when it comes to cases like this. You have the power, you have the money, and you will also share in the blame if the guys you paid off happened to be pieces of shit.
So maybe, just maybe, do your homework and be more active in these "hunts". With great reward comes great risk.
They could take them to a zoo, but that is no solution. Just a very slim chance these cubs will ever grow up to be normal lions. More human interference will not help.
Is it ethical though to interfere with animals like that? I don't think so. Prime directive and so on. Same with nature documentarians, even if it is a little baby you don't interfere with the natural order of things.
How does the $55,000 paid to hunt lions compared to the typical rates of such activity? Norms or much more?
Didn't it say the lion was lured out of the park? LolI have no reason to believe that he did anything wrong, nor the other hunters who were with them. They were on a guided hunt. Unless there was a big sign that says NOW ENTERING _______ STATE PARK DO NOT HUNT UNDER PENALTY etc. I have no reason to suspect that they knew something was amiss.
Or he could be well you knoe lying to save himself?
The dentist didn't pay anyone off. They hired a professional hunting & safari operation that had been in operation since 1992 and was licensed by the countries gaming authority.
Zimbabwe is charging that this outfit conspired with the landowner to poach a lion. At this time Zimbabwe is not claiming the hunter did anything wrong.
He followed appropriate protocol and depended on licensed professionals to do their job professionally and legally. It appears they did not and as such they have been arrested.
When he took it upon himself to finance a hunting expedition and personally pull the trigger?I'm guessing he never entered the preserve
Having met and talked with people who go on these African hunts, I believe that he had no idea something was amiss.
These guys aren't hunters, they are trigger men. They sit in a blind, or on a bluff, or in a tree and wait for the animal to be lured/chased/coralled into a kill box then they pull a trigger.
He paid $55k for a lion to a licensed professional hunting agency with international credentials and let them do all the work.
He's a rich privileged white guy, why do we all of a sudden expect he did his own due diligence?
It varies between article to article but I read at least one say that only 6 of those cubs are his and will get killed by the other male.Guess I missed that part. Ugh, that's heartbreaking
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cecil-lion-illegall-poached-killed-american-hunter-zimbabwe-groups-say/
As Animal Planet's predator expert David Salmoni explained to CBS News, Cecil had six cubs who will now probably be killed by a male lion from another group or coalition, as they are known.
http://news.yahoo.com/two-zimbabweans-face-charges-over-death-cecil-lion-002019159.html
The Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force charity said Palmer and professional Zimbabwean hunter Theo Bronkhorst had gone out at night with a spotlight and tied a dead animal to their vehicle to lure Cecil into range.
"Palmer shot Cecil with a bow and arrow but this shot didn't kill him. They tracked him down and found him 40 hours later when they shot him with a gun," the charity alleged.
It added that the hunters unsuccessfully tried to hide the dead lion's tracking collar, which was part of a University of Cambridge research programme.
"Cecil was skinned and beheaded. We don't know the whereabouts of the head," the charity alleged.
I personally would rather see them in a zoo where they have a chance at half a life rather than be killed off by a jealous male and be destroyed completely. I can't imagine they're better off dead than alive?
We do it all the time - I don't see how ethics comes in when we're talking about saving an already endangered animal from extinction, even if they themselves may not ever breed.
These revenge fantasies are gross.
I'm sure this guy is already rehabilitated.
People are seriously suggesting life in prison, and even death for this guy? These revenge fantasies are gross. I'm sure this guy is already rehabilitated.