Deadly Cyclone
Pride of Iowa State
Bought iCab and am loving it in fullscreen so far. Only question, I set up swipe gestures but using one finger when you swipe left it brings you to a gray screen, what is the point of that?
It's actually pretty fun, definitely worth the .99 I paid. Not having native hd sucks though.Gary Whitta said:How's NBA Jam on iPad? I'm downloading it now to help me survive a long flight later today.
It's supposed to swipe between tabs. Maybe you need to reboot the app.Deadly Cyclone said:Bought iCab and am loving it in fullscreen so far. Only question, I set up swipe gestures but using one finger when you swipe left it brings you to a gray screen, what is the point of that?
Ah, maybe it doesn't work in fullscreen.numble said:It's supposed to swipe between tabs. Maybe you need to reboot the app.
Oh maybe not--I rarely use full screen, actually.Deadly Cyclone said:Ah, maybe it doesn't work in fullscreen.
Just tried it on mine, looks like it's a bug with fullscreen mode.Deadly Cyclone said:Ah, maybe it doesn't work in fullscreen.
Gary Whitta said:How's NBA Jam on iPad? I'm downloading it now to help me survive a long flight later today.
suffah said:It's actually pretty fun, definitely worth the .99 I paid. Not having native hd sucks though.
Veal said:Having been apart of the "ipad-is-entirely-useless" camp for a little while, my thoughts on the usefulness of an ipad has changed considerably. I used to think "why buy an ipad when I could just get a cheaper netbook or laptop and be done with it" but now I'm seriously wondering if getting an ipad in lieu of either would be a good choice?
The form factor seems like a major plus and I'd just be goofing off with it for the most part (with some school time thrown in here and there.) Has the functionality of the ipad (and tablet pc's in general) gotten to the point where a laptop could be seen as overkill now?
LyleLanley said:Just tried it on mine, looks like it's a bug with fullscreen mode.
gutterboy44 said:Is there a good app to stream my iTunes on my PC to my iPad 2? Most of the time I like controlling the iTunes library with Remote and having it on the main speakers but occasionally I want to stream my music direct to the iPad.
That's built into iTunes. Just turn on home sharing and choose your library in the iPod app on the iPad.gutterboy44 said:Is there a good app to stream my iTunes on my PC to my iPad 2? Most of the time I like controlling the iTunes library with Remote and having it on the main speakers but occasionally I want to stream my music direct to the iPad.
Apple added that functionality in 4.3. You have to activate home sharing in iTunes on your PC. The iPod app on your iPad will find the shared library and then you'll be able to stream your music.gutterboy44 said:Is there a good app to stream my iTunes on my PC to my iPad 2? Most of the time I like controlling the iTunes library with Remote and having it on the main speakers but occasionally I want to stream my music direct to the iPad.
gutterboy44 said:Hahah thanks for the info blast. I feel stupid now. I thought it was built in, was right under my nose.
LOL, my fiancee named her first one Paddy. Her replacement was named Padoo.gutterboy44 said:Loving "Patty" so far.
dyls said:The New Yorker is finally free for subscribers. And a year digital-only subscription is a fair price of $60. Fucking finally. After a year of one star reviews Conde Nast has gotten the message. And only a week or so after announcing they wouldn't be bringing other magazines to the iPad due to soft sales.
It seems like all the publishers are starting to really come around recently. Maybe because they're hands are being forced by Apple's deadline.
Apple is winning over the big publishers. Last week, Hearst Corp. said it planned to start selling its magazines using Apples new iTunes subscription service. Now rival Conde Nast is actually doing it, via the publishers New Yorker title.
An updated version of that magazines iPad app lets users subscribe to the weekly magazine for $5.99 a month, or the equivalent of a $1.50 an issue. Thats a steep discount from the apps old model, which only sold individual issues for $4.99 a pop.
Conde Nast is selling an annual subscription to the iPad app for $59.99; a yearly subscription to the print version of the magazine costs $69.95. Very important: Conde says print subscribers will get iPad access for free.
The myth -- repeated ad nauseam by Apple (AAPL) naysayers -- is that Steve Jobs stole the ideas behind the Macintosh from Xerox's (XRX) Palo Alto Research Center.
The truth is that he paid for them -- with 100,000 shares of his company a year before its initial public offering.
The deeper truth, which Malcom ("The Tipping Point") Gladwell explores at length in the current issue of the New Yorker, is that Jobs had no interest in reproducing the work the team at Xerox PARC had done.
Jobs knew that the demo he and Bill Atkinson were given that day in 1979 -- Atkinson with his nose pressed almost against the screen, Jobs pacing around the room in an excited state -- represented the seeds of a computer revolution. But also knew that it was fatally flawed at many levels, starting with the three-button mouse that cost $300 and broke down within two weeks. Gladwell writes:
"The difference between direct and indirect manipulationbetween three buttons and one button, three hundred dollars and fifteen dollars, and a roller ball supported by ball bearings and a free-rolling ballis not trivial. It is the difference between something intended for experts, which is what Xerox PARC had in mind, and something that's appropriate for a mass audience, which is what Apple had in mind. PARC was building a personal computer. Apple wanted to build a popular computer."
It's a story that's been told before, but Gladwell spins it well with lots of new detail and color, including how Apple's first prototype mice were constructed out of butter dishes, spools of guitar wire, toy train wheels and roller balls taken from underarm deodorant sticks.
![]()
The piece is available free to subscribers on the iPad as part of a deal with Apple announced Monday. Like Time Inc., Condé Nast has used a Steve Jobs story as a lure to enlist new subscribers.
The image above is taken from a slide show of early mouse prototypes that the New Yorker has posted here.
I was hoping for a lower digital price. It is $10 cheaper than print if you get it direct from The New Yorker, but you can find really cheap print subscriptions for the New Yorker on a lot of those cheap online magazine retailers.dyls said:The New Yorker is finally free for subscribers. And a year digital-only subscription is a fair price of $60. Fucking finally. After a year of one star reviews Conde Nast has gotten the message. And only a week or so after announcing they wouldn't be bringing other magazines to the iPad due to soft sales.
It seems like all the publishers are starting to really come around recently. Maybe because they're hands are being forced by Apple's deadline.
numble said:I was hoping for a lower digital price. It is $10 cheaper than print if you get it direct from The New Yorker, but you can find really cheap print subscriptions for the New Yorker on a lot of those cheap online magazine retailers.
Ok thanks. I'm guessing now is a non-stupid time to buy then? i.e. not "NOOO JUST WAIT TWO WEEKS." Might head over to the App Store tomorrow.dream said:The Air should be fine for you, AstroLad.
AstroLad said:Ok thanks. I'm guessing now is a non-stupid time to buy then? i.e. not "NOOO JUST WAIT TWO WEEKS." Might head over to the App Store tomorrow.
AstroLad said:Ok thanks. I'm guessing now is a non-stupid time to buy then? i.e. not "NOOO JUST WAIT TWO WEEKS." Might head over to the App Store tomorrow.
I get trolled by Apple every day when they steal my location informations on my iTouch.Copernicus said:Astrolad is gonna get trolled by Apple in two weeks.
A Sandy Bridge + Thunderbolt update is coming any day now!AstroLad said:Ok thanks. I'm guessing now is a non-stupid time to buy then? i.e. not "NOOO JUST WAIT TWO WEEKS." Might head over to the App Store tomorrow.
I like Notes Plus.RJT said:So what's the best note taking app?
Evernote sucks, Moleskine is kinda cool but somewhat limited... What's cheap and decent?
Gary Whitta said:How's NBA Jam on iPad? I'm downloading it now to help me survive a long flight later today.
Nightz said:LOL, my fiancee named her first one Paddy. Her replacement was named Padoo.
Zozz said:Bought my gf an iPad 2, I think she'll will like it. As much as I like Android, the iOS on the tablet form is better then Honeycomb at the moment.
Zozz said:Bought my gf an iPad 2, I think she'll will like it. As much as I like Android, the iOS on the tablet form is better then Honeycomb at the moment.
Why would it need 2gb of ram? Sounds like e-penis competition.Spiderjericho said:I agree. And I'm enjoying my iPad, but the iTunes thing, lack of SD card, native HDMI support, GB of RAM (should be 2) and other things have me in the mindset that I'll probably be updating tablets annually. But it could simply be a case of the maturity of the platform.
But I expect the next generation of Google tablet OS, hardware and pricing to competitively go at Apple. Like the Transformer looks good, it's just the OS and video card that aren't on the level of Paddy.
Nevertheless, I'm addicted to playing solitaire, reading ebooks and comic zeal.
2 would be awesome, but that won't happen. I'm using the OG iPad and 256MB isn't enough for a good browsing or multi-tasking experience. The 2nd gen iPad does a better job, but it's still not "perfect". I hope the next iPad will come with at least 1GB.rezuth said:Why would it need 2gb of ram? Sounds like e-penis competition.