Tobor said:
Simple. I care about reading RSS feeds. I don't care about the weather often enough to need a widget. I can press one button and check it. The stuff I do want to know, like how many emails I have waiting, I already get. I'm less averse to the idea on the iPhone, bite sized data makes more sense to me there. It's just not how I use my iPad, and if they do add them, I'd hope they're optional or hidden, just like in OS X.
The key to the RSS reader is that it turns on when when I want it, takes up the full screen, then disappears until I need it again. That's how I want to use my device.
It's not how you use your iPad because you have no choice on how to use it. It really is no different than an RSS reader when you break it down. It's a centralized location to quickly look at different info. It could be a number of thing, latest news, latest sport scores, recent RSS feeds, you current agenda for the day and so forth. There's a wealth of reason to have all that available in some widget form rather than what we have now. I find it hard to believe you can't understand wanting a central and quicker access to info when you utilize a RSS Reader which simply is a replacement of having to go to every website to see what's going on. You don't like doing it there, so why can't you understand that people wouldn't want to do it with Apps?
Widgets should definitely be optional, especially if they're intertwined like on Android. I would certainly not mind a compromise of having one or two screens of widgets and then like multitasking, some limitations on how you design your widgets, but to not understand how it could benefit something in a tablet form factor is kinda boggling.
I don't think it's an issue of complexity either because it doesn't have to be. Just like push notifications, you turn on and off the ones you want, and like App screen management, you position them the way you want. I don't get what's so complicated.
Burger said:
What would you do with a USB slot?
Well in an ideal world, it would let me have an external HDD so I can transfer photos to it from an SD card, but that's my private use case. It's the one reason I can't use an iPad alone on travel and will need a laptop which makes the iPad now redundant in that case. I recognize that not everyone has this need though.
What it could be used for reasonably is well, instead of having to carry two cables around with you all the time, you would just need one USB cable which then you can use to read photos off of to use in certain apps. You could do the same with video. In fact Tobor told me with an iPad, if you buy the USB adapter, you can hook your iPhone up to it to use the video you captured on the iPhone to be used in the iPad version of iMovies. That's would be a huge benefit and make iMovies more useful on the iPad to me because realistically, I'm going to be capturing movies onthe iPhone and not the iPad like I think most people will. There's a number of benefits that come along with it including the fact that you wouldn't have to buy an expensive adapter that you have to carry around with you, making it a third unit to carry (regular USB, Apple USB, USB adapter) when it's all USB and could be simplified to one cable. I understand Apple's financial incentive, but to the end consumer it hurts you more than it benefits you.