A wrestling game.
The picture plays better than the title itself.
I don't think I can post on Gaming side anymore. There are people that 100% think Skyrim and GTA 4 and Splinter Cell Conviction are the worst games they've ever played. Not the most disappointing. The worst.
Worse than Simpsons Wrestling, Superman 64, Silver Surfer, The Sniper 2, Rise of the Robots, and Heavy Nova.
alsonierisoverratedandpretentiousasfuck
Superman threads in Gaming though hurt me and yet I'm still going at it. I don't even like Superman personally, but I refuse, I absolutely refuse, to accept that any license can't be given a good game despite some people just turning off their brains to say "lol, nope" and the equivalent. Is game design such a strange and mysterious concept that people refuse to even think about it? A game is either amazing or awful by random luck of the draw and not what is created or the thought put into it for design?
I get some people just say "Superman sucks, so no [good game can't be made]" as a joke, I have no problem if people don't like the ideas, but some people almost seem against the idea of actually talking about the mechanics and parts that make up a game or could make a game good or better. There are those whom I bet even if shown the perfect game, would refuse to accept anything good about it because they think the license or concept or creative team behind it "sucks". It's not just Superman, that's just the most recent example.
I don't know why I keep trying threads that aren't official threads for a game (Luigi's Mansion 2 is so friendly, like Luigi) or the communities over like iOS or PS+ or indy games.
