HeisenbergFX4
Member
I for sure don't understand this way of thinkingWould love for them to quit the software market too.
Give me more games to play, not less
In fact MS games this gen (for me) have far outclassed Sony games so far in quality
I for sure don't understand this way of thinkingWould love for them to quit the software market too.
Sony can take the hit of a cheaper subsidized cost because their system is guaranteed to sell 100mil and recoup on software sales. Microsoft doesn't have that luxury. This is less of a problem for Sony, but still most definitely a problem.
I wouldn't trust Phil Spencer as far as I could throw him.
A man who routinely lies.
We have ALREADY seen how they've reacted. The mass market has abandoned Xbox consoles, look at the sales, it's dead.
All you do is clutch as straws and pull "what if" scenarios out of your backside.
I'm not desperate at all for Microsoft to do that.
Open your eyes, look at the actual SALES. Look at what people are DOING.
Xbox consoles are close to dead, that's the reality.
Microsoft as a third party is going to have some big success this year and beyond.
Xbox as a platform is near enough dead now though.
Xbox as in the publisher shows promise
Xbox as in the console is dead
-29%
Further proof that Xbox as a console is now dead
That'll be when it hits home for the masses that Xbox is dead
Your son is all in on Xbox because you brainwashed him to be, if he gets bullied in school over it that's on you.
My daughter loves playing my Dreamcast, has she saved Sega's hardware business?
Xbox is dead.
Get over it.
Xbox is dead
You're fucking a corpse, man!
America isn't the world
Xbox is totally dead outside US
I think it's an American thing
Xbox is completely dead outside of the US and has been for some time.
I think some insular people see Xboxes in Walmart or whatever and assume that's the way it is everywhere. They live in a bubble.
Xbox IS dead in terms of the consoles named "Xbox"
The confusion is that they went from naming themselves Microsoft Studios to Xbox.
If they renamed themselves Microsoft gaming it would cause much less confusion and create a clear distinction.
Makes sense
PlayStation owners win
PS5 now gets games from studios that PlayStation consoles never got games from before.
Microsoft win
Microsoft's games are now no longer constrained to PC and Xbox consoles, providing the quality is there, the games will sell
Xbox owners lose
Xbox Series S/X has lost a huge selling point, console exclusives. That small audience of 30 million is unlikely to grow and, as a result, Microsoft's interest in their own consoles will wane too.
The only issue now is potential is Sony arrogance. With no exclusives anyone with half a brain will tell you a next-gen Xbox is dead on arrival.
How can Microsoft expect any next gen Xbox console to sell in numbers when everyone knows it'll have zero exclusives?
Why should third parties support a console that doesn't sell.
Xbox as a console brand is dead, it has no future and anyone who believes otherwise is deluded, completely deluded.
Who on earth is going to pay more than a Series X than a PS5 Pro.
Xbox is dead
I for sure don't understand this way of thinking
Give me more games to play, not less
In fact MS games this gen (for me) have far outclassed Sony games so far in quality
So you got nothing. Got it. Can you provide an official quote from Microsoft stating they are not doing a next gen console?I wouldn't trust Phil Spencer as far as I could throw him.
A man who routinely lies.
Wasn't he talking up the handheld to the press mere months ago rofl?So you got nothing. Got it. Can you provide an official quote from Microsoft stating they are not doing a next gen console?
And the frightening thing is, that's only a small selection of his unhinged posts about Xbox.
So you got nothing. Got it. Can you provide an official quote from Microsoft stating they are not doing a next gen console?
They never were really that great in the hardware space, so makes sense.
I don't understand questions like this when they've repeatedly gone on record (recently) as being in full development of a Series X next-gen successor.Over the past few weeks and months now there's been various reports on here of people around the world being unable to find Xbox consoles at retail.
That coupled with yesterdays reports that the handheld Xbox has now been canned, could the XSX DE end up being the final piece of Microsoft hardware bearing the "Xbox" name?
With Microsoft experiencing huge sales due to the massive PS5 user base and the possibility of replicating this on Switch 2, do Microsoft even need Xbox anymore?
This is from Phil who I swear is bi-polar, so take it or leave it.So you got nothing. Got it. Can you provide an official quote from Microsoft stating they are not doing a next gen console?
Are we going to still do hardware? Are we going to still get to play the games the way we've always played? Am I going to have to rent all my games? Can I still buy games? All that.
The fastest kind of platform is Cloud. That's the thing that's growing the fastest year over year and those are players like you were talking about, like that radio host. We were never going to catch that person with our console. So let's find them in a way that works, and it's better for Indiana Jones. It's better for Xbox.
Anyone who actually believes in Phil deserves to be disappointed.This is from Phil who I swear is bi-polar, so take it or leave it.
![]()
XboxEra Interviews Phil Spencer
Phil Spencer sat down with the XboxEra Podcast crew to catch up with us and celebrate our 250th Episode. Here's a lengthy written version (edited for brevity) along with a standalone video for you to enjoy. #Xboxxboxera.com
RG doesn't seem capable of being rational on this topic.I don't understand questions like this when they've repeatedly gone on record (recently) as being in full development of a Series X next-gen successor.
How do you reconcile that fact with your question?
Somethin's missin, for sure
Correct. And the Xbox PC will also be quietly taken off shelves within a year and not be replaced as they find out there is no demand for such a thing.Traditional consoles? Yes. The next Xbox is going to be a pc with an Xbox badge.
I for sure don't understand this way of thinking
Give me more games to play, not less
In fact MS games this gen (for me) have far outclassed Sony games so far in quality
True its very subjective but outside of Astrobot personally I have enjoyed more games from MS than Sony so far in this genI'd say quantity definitely, but quality.....not so sure. Debatable, but ultimately subjective. Either way, I don't get why anyone would want the games to go away. Microsoft has a solid offering this go around. That's a good thing.
True its very subjective but outside of Astrobot personally I have enjoyed more games from MS than Sony so far in this gen
Those plus for me anyhow add in Forza Horizon 5 and even MS Flight Sim (which I know a lot of people don't love but I do) and personally I feel MS has had a decent generation so farStarfield and Avowed are probably my two favorite MS games this gen. Ratchet and Clank and Astro Bot from Sony. Eh.....you know, I could go either way really. Stark contrast from last gen where Sony dominated MS in games.
[...] I think they very well could throw in the towel and quit hardware altogether. I honestly struggle to come up with a compelling reason why they would want to keep making hardware except for pride.
Valve has already been growing the Linux side and will launch their SteamOS line of devices ahead of Microsoft. You should google why SteamOS exist, then you'll understand why it might be risky to help them enter the living room.By helping them grow on Windows, they keep them on Windows and don't allow them to grow something like Linux at the expense of Windows.
They want the Valve/Windows dependency to be as strong as possible because it's in Microsoft's longer strategic benefit for it to be so, and if the Xbox brand and marketshare evaporates in the process then they broke some eggs to make an omelet.
I know what SteamOS is rofl and I know it's coming to other devices. You're missing my point entirely.Valve has already been growing the Linux side and will launch their SteamOS line of devices ahead of Microsoft. You should google why SteamOS exist, then you'll understand why it might be risky to help them enter the living room.
Ok I understand what you're saying. But I think it could easily backfire so Steam becomes more popular, then SteamOS devices is seen as better than the new Xbox with Steam or new UI in Windows with Steam, then the new Steam userbase swap out both their Xbox and Windows gaming PC to a SteamOS device, and Microsoft is standing there with a smaller markershare wondering what happened.I know what SteamOS is rofl and I know it's coming to other devices. You're missing my point entirely.
What Microsoft wants is for Valve to have the majority of its business still conducted on Windows. If they just let them be and let them grow SteamOS as they see fit then Valve will eventually be in a position to start dictating terms or even driving non-Windows OS adoption.
Right now Valve's business is at best at a 90:10 split between Windows and SteamOS, Microsoft wants to keep it that way as long as possible, one way to do this is to "allow" Steam to start selling to the Xbox userbase directly.
Does this potentially torch Xbox? Probably yes, but it also keeps Valve reliant on being friendly to Microsoft in the medium and long-term.
Those plus for me anyhow add in Forza Horizon 5 and even MS Flight Sim (which I know a lot of people don't love but I do) and personally I feel MS has had a decent generation so far
I can see myself playing more PS games this latter half of this generation though with Death Stranding 2 and Ghost of Yotei to name a couple.
How about a place for hardcore Xbox fans, especially those who are in love with GP, to have a high-end next-gen option? And a place to access their game library? Wouldn't those be reasons to offer at least the hybrid model (although the market will be small)?
Rn SteamOS has 2 very big obstacles in its way:Ok I understand what you're saying. But I think it could easily backfire so Steam becomes more popular, then SteamOS devices is seen as better than the new Xbox with Steam or new UI in Windows with Steam, then the new Steam userbase swap out both their Xbox and Windows gaming PC to a SteamOS device, and Microsoft is standing there with a smaller markershare wondering what happened.
Congratulations you are the 1 millionth person to post this same thread.Over the past few weeks and months now there's been various reports on here of people around the world being unable to find Xbox consoles at retail.
That coupled with yesterdays reports that the handheld Xbox has now been canned, could the XSX DE end up being the final piece of Microsoft hardware bearing the "Xbox" name?
With Microsoft experiencing huge sales due to the massive PS5 user base and the possibility of replicating this on Switch 2, do Microsoft even need Xbox anymore?
I guess they could make an unsubsidized high end console. It would have limited appeal though much like PS5 Pro.
Why not go the other way though? Focus on value. One of the problems with Xbox series is they are expensive to make. They have great build quality and an elaborate split mainboard design. Think if they went simpler, cheaper, less powerful and try to undercut PlayStation by $100 but not so as far behind in power as a XSS then that might be a good companion to Game Pass. But will that be enought to pull market share from PlayStation?
I don't know. It is just hard to imagine a scenario where Microsoft truly benefits from being in hardware. Perhaps it is time to just embrace being a publisher and not a platform owner.
xbox is a failure and nowhere near as successful as they were with 360. they have no identity.No, they are more successful than ever.
Fans of Sony's PlayStation hardware would love to see another competitor gone for some reason, even at the expense of their own console experience.