Are you impressed yet with MS?

The Abominable Snowman said:
I think anyone who says they were not impressive is either just heavily biased against MS or a buffoon.
Or possibly those people are just more attuned to what MS is capable of and don't see anything out of the ordinary in their performance. Being impressed involves exceeded expectations and some of you obviously had a very low opinion of MS before this.
 
lol... and of course Kaching, you thought that MS would secure 2nd place and be pushing sony hard going into the next gen right?

Come on, hand on heart.. were your expectations even that high?
 
Xbox Live! >>> All

That is all.


In fact, me heart Xbox Live! so much I may only get a Xbox 360 next gen if some of my companies from Japan I like start making some Xbox 360 games. Dynasty Warriors 6 simultaneous Xbo 360/PS3 release in North America? Make it so Koei!
 
Ironclad_Ninja said:
Amir0x, I think it is time to revive the "Which camp are you?" campaign.

Seriously! This is out of control!

WhichCamp2008.jpg

IronCladShack2002.jpg
 
Mrbob said:
Xbox Live! >>> All

That is all.


In fact, me heart Xbox Live! so much I may only get a Xbox 360 next gen if some of my companies from Japan I like start making some Xbox 360 games. Dynasty Warriors 6 simultaneous Xbo 360/PS3 release in North America? Make it so Koei!

Considering how popular DW remains in japan, Sony would be foolish not to lock them up exclusive next-gen.
 
The End said:
Considering how popular DW remains in japan, Sony would be foolish not to lock them up exclusive next-gen.

Kuturagi is actually a fan of the Dynasty Warriors series, I read from... EGM was it? OPM? He helped fund the Dynasty Warriors "kids battle" commercial.
 
The End said:
Considering how popular DW remains in japan, Sony would be foolish not to lock them up exclusive next-gen.


Could you imagine is Dynasty Warriors 6 launched with the Xbox 360 in Japan? That could be quite the impact for the console.
 
Amir0x said:
Wow. I mean, I'm not saying I agree or disagree with your statement here, but just so you know I can never take you seriously again. Objectivity is all flyin' away! I'll just have to love you from afar! :D


Does anyone on this forum take me seriously? I doubt it.


You say this as if the world will end if Sony does win "until the end of time." I don't understand why you have this "Bill Gates, you are our last hope" mentality, but it doesn't really make sense. We play games. PS2 has good games. Gamecube has good games. Xbox has good games. And at the end of the day whoever does end up winning "until the end of time" will also be the system that gets all the best games. So it doesn't matter who does it, really. But brand loyalty is important to some people I guess. Or maybe I'm overreacting.


Nah, it's just that two companies of this size/resources aren't going to let each other coexist for generation after generation. Nintendo and Sega could, because neither company possesses the competitive advantage to drive the other out without using borderline illegal tactics. (that's in Nintendo's case, of course)
 
Mrbob said:
Could you imagine is Dynasty Warriors 6 launched with the Xbox 360 in Japan? That could be quite the impact for the console.
God the next gen graphics on DW could be incredible.
 
android said:
:lol why the f*ck is Microsoft a windmill? :lol

Haha, I designed each segment according to how they are doing in the industry/other factors. So like Nintendo is at the bottom marketshare wise, so they live in a teepee because it's not exactly a strong/sturdy establishment but it's still pretty to look at. Microsoft is a windmill because it's a bit stronger and it's running off its own energy, because they have a neverending amount of money. And Sony is a fort, because they built a huge videogame empire and are now being attacked on the daily. But at any time it can fall to a large enough siege. And finally, the PC is like a old technology factory. Some great, awesome technology but it has a lot of polution because it hasn't exactly found a decent middle ground between cost/technology.

Speevy said:
Does anyone on this forum take me seriously? I doubt it.

I still take you seriously, I was just kidding. But seriously, that statement was off-the-wall-in-the-trenches like :P

Speevy said:
Nah, it's just that two companies of this size/resources aren't going to let each other coexist for generation after generation. Nintendo and Sega could, because neither company possesses the competitive advantage to drive the other out without using borderline illegal tactics. (that's in Nintendo's case, of course)

Heh. Well, I like competition. I hope whatever road we go down it's more like SNES/Genesis days for all eternity and less like Drinky Cow's "one console future." Not that I wouldn't be content then too, but competition always seems to drive certain aspects of the industry forward faster than you'd expect.
 
Speevy said:
Nah, it's just that two companies of this size/resources aren't going to let each other coexist for generation after generation. Nintendo and Sega could, because neither company possesses the competitive advantage to drive the other out without using borderline illegal tactics. (that's in Nintendo's case, of course)
The United States and Russia pulled it off. A 50/50 split could be really fun (lets face it nintendo won't last another two generations. Their namebrand is done. It's so done Grandpa's picking it's remain from his dentures. :D )


Amorix: i get it now. It fits preety good.
 
callous said:
Why? If the next iteration was crap and MS gave up (it won't be and they won't, but for argument's sake), you'd just have one less console to buy and find room for under your TV. The games would just be on another platform. Sounds good to me.
Neither Sony nor (especially) Nintendo match Microsoft when it comes to things like online and robust community interaction. Microsoft's online plan is just pure bliss. I am enthralled with the different direction Microsoft has taken. I could not have lived without the Hard Drive in the Xbox, either. Sony and Nintendo didn't think of such an application before Microsoft. For the next generation, Microsoft is putting emphasis on integration with other Microsoft products, something Sony nor Nintendo can replicate (Unless what Trip said is true and MS buys Nintendo).

Aside that, I doubt I'll ever buy a Nintendo console again, leaving me with Sony.
 
Amir0x said:
Wow.You say this as if the world will end if Sony does win "until the end of time." I don't understand why you have this "Bill Gates, you are our last hope" mentality, but it doesn't really make sense. We play games. PS2 has good games. Gamecube has good games. Xbox has good games. And at the end of the day whoever does end up winning "until the end of time" will also be the system that gets all the best games. So it doesn't matter who does it, really. But brand loyalty is important to some people I guess. Or maybe I'm overreacting.

I don't think you are, and my point of view is exactly the same. For selfish reasons I would hope for a Japanese winner, because if Xbox-X somehow became the dominant platform I fear the Japanese, proud as they are, would create a platform of their own and not bother much with getting the content out in the US and EU. That would mean less Japanese games (that I tend to like more) would be translated. I could very well be wrong in my estimation of just how proud the Japanese are, and I don't mean we'd have no Japanese content, but I would hate to see less than what we are seeing now. Apart from that, it doesn't make any difference to me who "wins", if anyone does, and if I didn't have that nagging fear about content, I'd hope for it to be the company with the technically best console regardless of origin. I think we'll see at least a two-console world for a long time to come, though.

Edit: Snowman, if you don't have the same fears I have, then backing MS as a consequence of their superior hardware and online plan this generation certainly makes sense.
 
DCharlie said:
That's great but where is the standardization across all games? WC3 is great, but it's not a standard enforced on every game is it? Xbox live is more than just what it actually does - it provides an element of community by the simple virtue that everyone is forced into the same system. Added to that you have voice chat in all games, friend tracking service, server support from MS, an improving and evolving service etc... sure you can get similar deals on the PC for free running several bits of software to get a similar effect but with less "reach" , but we are talking about 600 yen a month fee here for that convenience (that's about the price of a small beer), plus the one unified log on and that every live user with Xbox contactable. I know people like to dismiss this as nothing, but i just don't see it that way.
Well, it pretty much is a standard. I can't think of an online PC game that
hasn't received a generous amount of support.

PC games are just as, if not more, "unified" than Live games. Blizzard games have buddy lists and PC games have servers, not to mention the fact that PC games get the advantage of if the game is good it will have a decent sized community for years.
The thing that really irks me is the fact that you're not paying for anything. What are you paying for the second year you're on Live, let alone the first? I just don't see how the equivalent of adding MSN to online games is worth $50 a year. It isn't, XBox Live is just a bunch of arbitrary "features" created to justify taking $50 a year from people who have deep pockets or just don't know any better.
 
callous said:
I don't think you are, and my point of view is exactly the same. For selfish reasons I would hope for a Japanese winner, because if Xbox-X somehow became the dominant platform I fear the Japanese, proud as they are, would create a platform of their own and not bother much with getting the content out in the US and EU. That would mean less Japanese games (that I tend to like more) would be translated. I could very well be wrong in my estimation of just how proud the Japanese are, and I don't mean we'd have no Japanese content, but I would hate to see less than what we are seeing now. Apart from that, it doesn't make any difference to me who "wins", if anyone does, and if I didn't have that nagging fear about content, I'd hope for it to be the company with the technically best console regardless of origin. I think we'll see at least a two-console world for a long time to come, though.
They would not. The US and europe are the two biggest markets. The japanese need to change not the other way around. They will flow to whoever has the biggest marketshare as their main system or they will go bankrupt.
 
pjberri said:
Well, it pretty much is a standard. I can't think of an online PC game that
hasn't received a generous amount of support.

PC games are just as, if not more, "unified" than Live games. Blizzard games have buddy lists and PC games have servers, not to mention the fact that PC games get the advantage of if the game is good it will have a decent sized community for years.
The thing that really irks me is the fact that you're not paying for anything. What are you paying for the second year you're on Live, let alone the first? I just don't see how the equivalent of adding MSN to online games is worth $50 a year. It isn't, XBox Live is just a bunch of arbitrary "features" created to justify taking $50 a year from people who have deep pockets or just don't know any better.


Or perhaps people spend $50 a year for the best broadband only online service available that offers near lag free experience on almost every game. If you don't want to pay go play through the rubbish which is PS2 online and tell me $50 a year is too much for xbox live. Too bad most PS2 online games are garbage due to the insane amount of lag incurred.

Lets not turn this into a PC/console argument. The reason so many PC games are free online is because most of the servers are run by fans.
 
callous said:
I don't think you are, and my point of view is exactly the same. For selfish reasons I would hope for a Japanese winner, because if Xbox-X somehow became the dominant platform I fear the Japanese, proud as they are, would create a platform of their own and not bother much with getting the content out in the US and EU. That would mean less Japanese games (that I tend to like more) would be translated. I could very well be wrong in my estimation of just how proud the Japanese are, and I don't mean we'd have no Japanese content, but I would hate to see less than what we are seeing now. Apart from that, it doesn't make any difference to me who "wins", if anyone does, and if I didn't have that nagging fear about content, I'd hope for it to be the company with the technically best console regardless of origin. I think we'll see at least a two-console world for a long time to come, though.

Ah. For what it's worth, I don't really think the Japanese side would just make its own console and give the finger to the rest of the world. If anything, whatever eventually comes out on top will just force stronger competition among game developers themselves. So Japanese developers will really want to outclass American developers and vice versa.
 
kaching said:
Or possibly those people are just more attuned to what MS is capable of and don't see anything out of the ordinary in their performance. Being impressed involves exceeded expectations and some of you obviously had a very low opinion of MS before this.
They've managed to thrash a 20+ year veteran in gaming and put heat on the market's goliath. If I were basing it off of the first year, then I would have easily said that Microsoft's next generation system would have been a dud. They've come a long way since the first year. That's impressive to me. Their performance has been impressive. They've been known to have something blow up in their face before as well.
 
android said:
They would not. The US and europe are the two biggest markets. The japanese need to change not the other way around. They will flow to whoever has the biggest marketshare as their main system or they will go bankrupt.

If it comes down to that, I hope you are right.
 
callous said:
Edit: Snowman, if you don't have the same fears I have, then backing MS as a consequence of their superior hardware and online plan this generation certainly makes sense.
Call me Snowmie :lol

Microsoft just has an entirely different vision from Nintendo and Sony, which kicks ass. Their vision is more in tune with where game consoles should have been, IMO, 5 or 10 years ago. They still have a bit of development to go, but the vision they have is definitely something worth backing. I could care less about the superiority of their hardware, although it's very nice.

Could you reiterate your fears about Microsoft coming in and giving a stellar console performance?
 
callous said:
If it comes down to that, I hope you are right.
I am. Look at Resident Evil 4. It would not have been made without the US and Europe to sell to. Do you know what games cost to produce. The japanese game market has absolutely collasped. I could care less about "super fantastic furry rpg xii" but every other major franchise needs the west as a market.
 
The Abominable Snowman said:
Could you reiterate your fears about Microsoft coming in and giving a stellar console performance?

Dear Snowmie, :P

I don't think I can make my concerns anymore clear than I already have done. Android and Amirox are probably right, but I'm not completely convinced.

Best regards,

-callous

P.S. I could also just spend the next two years getting my kanji count back up. That way I'd be prepared for the worst and you people wouldn't have to listen to me whine. So much work, though.
 
Well, this is my last words in regards to this argument: If Nintendo nor Sony can bring their gameplan and vision to Microsoft's level, then Microsoft deserves a good spot in this market.
 
pjberri said:
Well, it pretty much is a standard. I can't think of an online PC game that
hasn't received a generous amount of support.

PC games are just as, if not more, "unified" than Live games. Blizzard games have buddy lists and PC games have servers, not to mention the fact that PC games get the advantage of if the game is good it will have a decent sized community for years.
The thing that really irks me is the fact that you're not paying for anything. What are you paying for the second year you're on Live, let alone the first? I just don't see how the equivalent of adding MSN to online games is worth $50 a year. It isn't, XBox Live is just a bunch of arbitrary "features" created to justify taking $50 a year from people who have deep pockets or just don't know any better.

PC games are nowhere near as unified as xbox live games. All live games come under the same umbrella. The price issue is a big concern though, essentially you pay for peer to peer online play which i think is wrong.
 
The whole complaining about paying for xbox live thing is just plain stupid. World of warcraft is 14 dollars a month, everquest is about 13 a month and city of heroes is 15 a month and you guys complain about 50 a year. Geez some people hate just for the sake of hating
 
DCharlie said:
I personally would have hated MS if they'd threw those x billion at aquiring companies. That would have sucked and people would have been up in arms about them "buying" the industry.

Every single company has a price. Especially those listed on the stock exchange with not enough stock under control of the company.
What's with the single-minded focus on acquiring other companies here? I just said they should have spent more money to acquire a larger portion of the marketshare. There's several ways they could have spent their money towards that end. Sure, maybe acquire a couple more companies or more exclusive support. But I was also thinking of things like ponying up for a redesign of the box that would appeal to a wider audience, more aggressive pricing models on the hardware and not charging people for basic online peer-to-peer play...etc.

come now, even i thought they'd trail in last. Me and a friend joked about how they should just call it 4DO and have done with it. I certainly didn't think, on the day i picked up my GC, that MS would be in the possition that they are now.

...

lol... and of course Kaching, you thought that MS would secure 2nd place and be pushing sony hard going into the next gen right?

Come on, hand on heart.. were your expectations even that high?
Your keen industry insight proved to be lacking so where do you get off telling me that I'm the one who set my expectations high here? Sega had nearly matched Nintendo in the 16-bit generation and Sony went on to surpass them handily in the 32-bit generation, so what exactly was surprising about MS having the ability to do it as well? Knee-jerk conventional wisdom fueled by nostalgia, perhaps?

Quaint analogies are always the best way to look at reality when you are scared of the forthcoming challenges...
The analogy is directed at your perception of MS not MS itself. So, yes, I guess you could say I fear for the forthcoming challenges that your perceptions face ;)
 
so , the flip side analogy is you as the dad of the Son who always has to win saying "You know, that new kid hit a good shot near the end, but hey... it fell half way short , just ignore the fact that he has potential, he's a nobody" ?

or is it just wrong to think that MS might actually be doing some good?
 
No, but I like how I'm placed at the opposite extreme here when all I'm saying is that they're performing basically to expectations.
 
android said:
The whole complaining about paying for xbox live thing is just plain stupid. World of warcraft is 14 dollars a month, everquest is about 13 a month and city of heroes is 15 a month and you guys complain about 50 a year. Geez some people hate just for the sake of hating

Its not so much the money,but rather having to give credit card details.
 
Throwing billions of dollars into a console will not make you successful.

Barely earning second place while losing billions of dollars does not deem you successful.

Next time I'll just create a thread with those two options in a poll and set the question to, "Which mindset are you of?"

People won't be allowed to discuss the issue because no one's position ever changes here. Instead it'll just turn into a picture thread where everyone has to draw a picture of the Microsoft Windmill.

And it'll be the best Gaming Forum thread in years.
 
PS2: 38,954
PSP: 38,314
NDS: 22,363
GBASP: 10,849
NGC: 3,256
GBA: 399
XBX: 295

Some people need to take a second look at these numbers for last week.
 
Impressed ? Of Course ! Mistwalker has already proven us that their games are the best in the genre in all fields and that Square, Enix, Monolith or Falcom suck in comparisson....Oh wait...
 
I've been impressed since day 1 when I got mine

Quoting myself from page 2. The reason I brought the sales numbers up is some people are under the strange impression that MS has Sony on the ropes. Or at least that's the impression I got. I love the Xbox, but that doesn't change that fact that the sales are abysmal in Japan.

Oh teh nooos!

P.S. That's no longer cute or clever anymore.
 
Microsoft has kicked ass this gen. with their Xbox,I'm more than satisfied. They've received great 3rd party support and made online gaming damn fun,they get my respect and my money for when Xenon arrives. I know that RARE and Bungie will have the games in place down the line,and the Bioware collaboration along with Microsoft's strong ties to the Western and Euro market development wise are great,bring it on even moreso for next gen.

Japan could be a better story,but eh..who cares I primarily play Westerm games,if I need some Eastern stuff I'll just whip out the PS3 for that sector of gaming.
 
Angelus said:
Japan could be a better story,but eh..who cares I primarily play Westerm games,if I need some Eastern stuff I'll just whip out the PS3 for that sector of gaming.
This doesn't really make a case to take your opinion on the matter seriously. You were doing so good too.
 
Mrbob said:
Or perhaps people spend $50 a year for the best broadband only online service available that offers near lag free experience on almost every game. If you don't want to pay go play through the rubbish which is PS2 online and tell me $50 a year is too much for xbox live. Too bad most PS2 online games are garbage due to the insane amount of lag incurred.

Lets not turn this into a PC/console argument. The reason so many PC games are free online is because most of the servers are run by fans.
Try replying to my post when you can do so without resorting to the typical diatribe of an idiotic fanboy. :)

Ryudo said:
PC games are nowhere near as unified as xbox live games. All live games come under the same umbrella. The price issue is a big concern though, essentially you pay for peer to peer online play which i think is wrong.
I phrased my argument wrong there, I meant to say that the communities in PC games are more unified. You're right, the games themselves are unified with the service, but that's pretty useless when a sizeable portion of the communities of each game routinely change to whatever the current flavour of the month is.
 
Mike Works said:
This doesn't really make a case to take your opinion on the matter seriously. You were doing so good too.

I dunno who you are,maybe some elite gamer who lives Japanese gaming to the extreme,I dunno. But the fact that you replied with one of the stupidest posts I've seen in some time shows that you don't play games for the right reasons.
 
Angelus said:
I dunno who you are,maybe some elite gamer who lives Japanese gaming to the extreme,I dunno.
That's right, you don't know. I own 47 current gen console games. 17 of them were made in Japan.

But the fact that you replied with one of the stupidest posts I've seen in some time shows that you don't play games for the right reasons.
1) A space always comes after a comma.

2) Coming from the guy who's named himself after a Buffy character with the pixelated picture of another Buffy character.

3) I didn't reply with a stupid post. I replied to one. In a thread judging Microsoft's accomplishments or lack thereof, letting their console off for having poor Japanese (developer) support because you can always get that from a rival console is the kind of retardation that could get your hands cut off in Iran.

But hey, maybe I could change my name to Giles and shrink this

04.jpg


down to avatar size. Then I could try plugging my Dual Shock into my XBox while attempting to conquer the extreme mental plane that you seem to be on right now. One day I will reach the summit of that internal mountain and wrap my fingers around the mushy logic you so gracefully possess. And at that very moment, I will know bliss itself.

Also the mountain will be called Cordelia.

And it will have Seth Green's face carved on it.
 
Dante said:
PS2: 38,954
PSP: 38,314
NDS: 22,363
GBASP: 10,849
NGC: 3,256
GBA: 399
XBX: 295

Some people need to take a second look at these numbers for last week.

Why ? Japan is dead, it means nothing. Its like having french fries without salt. Its diet coke, its wanking instead of having sex... yada yada....

Can we end this discussion now ? how about some more premature cube death topic ? or how yamakoochi now drives a skyline ?
 
DCharlie said:
lol... and of course Kaching, you thought that MS would secure 2nd place and be pushing sony hard going into the next gen right?

Come on, hand on heart.. were your expectations even that high?

This isn't Japan (Where Apple enjoys a more mass appeal).

The average person in this country, while being totally computer illiterate and needing someone to fix anything that goes wrong with their computer (Even if it's from incompetence on MS' part), has an EXTREMELYj favorable view of Microsoft. They're without question one of the most admired companies in this country. Geeks may detest them (Although, ironically, it's the geeks who would be most impressed by XBox), but Joe Citizen knows only of their financial success and admires the hell out of them. Fact. Polls have proven this.

So is it a shock that to Joe Consumer a Microsoft XBox had a favorable connotation to it? Absolutely not. Only the hardcore computer crowd would be shocked by this. MS' "success" in the U.S. should not have surprised anyone (At least in the scale it took).
 
"This isn't Japan (Where Apple enjoys a more mass appeal).

The average person in this country, while being totally computer illiterate and needing someone to fix anything that goes wrong with their computer (Even if it's from incompetence on MS' part), has an EXTREMELYj favorable view of Microsoft. They're without question one of the most admired companies in this country. Geeks may detest them (Although, ironically, it's the geeks who would be most impressed by XBox), but Joe Citizen knows only of their financial success and admires the hell out of them. Fact. Polls have proven this.

So is it a shock that to Joe Consumer a Microsoft XBox had a favorable connotation to it? Absolutely not. Only the hardcore computer crowd would be shocked by this. MS' "success" in the U.S. should not have surprised anyone (At least in the scale it too"

um... i wasn't doubting that. I was doubting Kachings statement that he thought the Xbox would be a success before it's launch.
 
I'm impressed for several reasons. First, they had the balls to go head-to-head with Sony (or at least try to) in a market that Sony dominates like nobodies business and, after many $$$ of investment, they're finally heading towards a position of being able to capture significant market share.

Second, they've created a powerful brand in the west, brought online play possibilities to the masses, and have gained many close development and publishing partners to further support their efforts despite the goliath that is Sony.

Finally, I've had my most fun this generation on my Xbox, and that to me is the most important factor in this discussion.

I also have a feeling that even more people/gamers/analysts/fanboys will be impressed with Microsoft's efforts in the coming months and in the coming years. Whereas before the Xbox launched, almost unanimously it was deemed to never have a chance and hated on (not by me, though) and now it seems that, incredibly, many of those same haters are starting to believe. Amazing.
 
Top Bottom