Off to work, will try to work out a vote by lunch and post then. Other than that won't be around till about 2.5 hrs before deadline.
Sorian, are you a serial killer?
Very curious now, please explain your findings Maz!
Off to work, will try to work out a vote by lunch and post then. Other than that won't be around till about 2.5 hrs before deadline.
Sorian, are you a serial killer?
Is this just because I said I needed to reread you?Tentatively saying yeah lynch AB though
AB voted faddy 5 min before day end, AB didn't push faddy today. If the intention of his vote at day end was to communicate who he thought was mafia, he would have pushed faddy today. No vote from AB today.
so?Is this just because I said I needed to reread you?jk
I don't usually vote early, fwiw.
Off to work, will try to work out a vote by lunch and post then. Other than that won't be around till about 2.5 hrs before deadline.
Sorian, are you a serial killer?
Well I think folks smell blood in the water and are simply riding the wave to get someone who is putting themselves out there voted out.
I'm imagining it won't be the early votes, but some in the middle if he proves to be innocent that are scum
rereading, you didn't even "me too" one of the people who were actually pushing Faddy today. The only time you mentioned Faddy was to defend your vote yesterday.
Tentatively saying yeah lynch AB though
AB voted faddy 5 min before day end, AB didn't push faddy today. If the intention of his vote at day end was to communicate who he thought was mafia, he would have pushed faddy today. No vote from AB today.
Verelios is right and sorian is being weird and defensive
Off to work, will try to work out a vote by lunch and post then. Other than that won't be around till about 2.5 hrs before deadline.
Sorian, are you a serial killer?
He could have but I think the combination of defending his vote today, not following up on it, not pushing, and not visibly looking for mafia elsewhere is still real scummy.He could've just changed his mind? I don't know if this analysis you've (or Veir, I guess) got sticks.
I will say, I do not like Sorian's reaction.
He could have but I think the combination of defending his vote today, not following up on it, not pushing, and not visibly looking for mafia elsewhere is still real scummy.
others should weigh in idk
For whatever it's worth, my scum order.
Faddy > Sexy Fish > Fat4All > Sorian. AB is suspicious, but that's it. Most everyone in this game has some sticking point I can find that is suspect. AB is no different, but if all we're going by is that one post at day end yesterday, I'd say that's not enough. Bats is (like usual) a wildcard. Seems more and more scummy, but somehow not. Sure, he's trying to scumhunt hardcore, but that's his MO in just about every game I've played with him. It's some of his logic that I don't particularly like.
Top town are Flame_AC, Verelios , and somewhat Royal Flush. I haven't seen really anything suspect from them, saving Terrabyte's vote dance last phase. But Flame has been nothing but town to me, since.
I'm not sure I like this list. It feels too close to the vote consensus. Either scum trying to hide or unoriginal town?
I'll move my vote if Mick doesn't post soon, since he's heading for a prod anyway.
I'm glad my thoughts on who is scum are unoriginal to you. I'll try to communicate to my brain that I it's better to be original and wrong than unoriginal and right.
Also, Sorian is no where near consensus, and I seem to be the one of the few travelling that path.
Oh, I must've missed the meeting where we changed the meta to where one has to have completely out of consensus scum theories in order to be seen as town in gafia.
My bad.
Your vote on Faddy was literally saying he was throwing shade day 1, therefore vote. Not that he's scum, not that he's suspicious, but that he was mostly worthless to town, I'd like to say 20 to 30 minutes to day end, where you're the ONLY vote on him. I don't understand how you can reconcile a vote for him but not for any of the others in contention, where you could probably cook up any number of shitpost/worthless/suspicious allegations instead of standing to the side doing nothing.
This is what got Sorian's hackles raised and I'm trying really hard to understand why he's making this out to be a bus attempt from an actual observation. I'd bus AB a day into day 2 when no one else commented on it, I'm sure these aren't just your delusions. Your entire problem seems to stem from me not seeing Ab's post as premium scum hunting 101, so let's be real, I think you're either on some weird trip right now or there's something more to your persistence.Throwing shade without placing down votes is literally scumtell 101. I don't even feel like I'm defending AB by saying that. It is straight one of the best things to look for especially when hunting newbie scum. That's not a "worthless to town" behavior.
I'm not certain that one of Fat and Faddy are scum, but I suspect them both so I think it's likely there's scum there.
What changed your mind on Fat/Faddy? Or alternatively if your opinion didn't change of them what pulled SexyFish past them?I'm not sold there's scum in any of the top votes players. If I had to pick one though I'd probably go SexyFish. I'll put my vote there for now.
VOTE: SexyFish
Okay, rereading and putting down thoughts:
@Fat4all - sorry if I seemed actually bothered by the avatar or anything, it was meant as an offhand joke
@Sorian - It is always sort of curious how you react to people who talk about ("defend") you to other players. I have seen it in several games now. It is like you see even a single explanatory comment as trying to score Sorian-points or something. Weird.
@acohrs - (post 161) I am just curious, if you were still typing your post, why have the "That's all I have for now folks! Oh, except for one more"? You're typing, not talking. Not a #scumtell or anythin, just curious.
@'batfam' (the term) - please let's not make this a thing. It's not a thing.
@Faddy's 'dont implicate me' post - I thought it was pretty clearly a joke? I mean "clearly shows evidence"? On D1? I am doubt he is serious.
@rng votes - plz no
Guess that's it? Also I am leaving work shortly. Should/might be around later this evening and tomorrow.
I can see a newer scum player trying to suck up to a well known town player, but that's the only way 'sorian points' makes any sense.
....
:|
I am town reading him, yes, but I failed to realize not everyone else is.
This is what got Sorian's hackles raised and I'm trying really hard to understand why he's making this out to be a bus attempt from an actual observation. I'd bus AB a day into day 2 when no one else commented on it, I'm sure these aren't just your delusions. Your entire problem seems to stem from me not seeing Ab's post as premium scum hunting 101, so let's be real, I think you're either on some weird trip right now or there's something more to your persistence.
About AB..
This post from Day 1 still looks funny. So much nothing.
Also, I'm going to say Sorian is town and that these posts from StarSketch were an actual fuckup.
I might be misremembering, but did you ever bring up AB or this post specifically up before?
What changed your mind on Fat/Faddy? Or alternatively if your opinion didn't change of them what pulled SexyFish past them?
Long Live RetroMG, Magnanimous ruler of Gafia
I don't ask for much, I don't even ask for reading comprehension, all I ask is that you actually read what I write every time I post. I said I won't pretend he didn't vote for non-scum reasons, because his vote to me was honestly just nothing, it was a policy vote at that point to seem busy. What you're calling me sketchy for, as I've said repeatedly and what I keep saying in my opinion, not finding his post to be scum hunting. Your entire ball and chain in this argument seems to be to argue for the sake of argument, which is really funny that you're moving the topic of discussion slowly away from AB to me.I don't know how to get this point across anymore without making the same post for probably the 5th time. I'm not saying his post was premium scum hunting and the hyperbole doesn't help the argument. It was a scum hunting attempt or at least presented as such which is where the rub is. You saying it wasn't and then pretending you didn't say as much is where this gets sketchy.
Rereading the day and following the play since then, it's been feeling more like a town/town mistaken pileon than town/scum interacting. Just feels like we're being lead the wrong way.
I don't ask for much, I don't even ask for reading comprehension, all I ask is that you actually read what I write every time I post. I said I won't pretend he didn't vote for non-scum reasons, because his vote to me was honestly just nothing, it was a policy vote at that point to seem busy. What you're calling me sketchy for, as I've said repeatedly and what I keep saying in my opinion, not finding his post to be scum hunting. Your entire ball and chain in this argument seems to be to argue for the sake of argument, which is really funny that you're moving the topic of discussion slowly away from AB to me.
I ask for evidence, you show none. I ask for logic, you put up a false equivocacy wherever something can stick such as 'sketchy', 'scummy', whatever with no followup.
Shi...I've literally answered you question 3 or 4 times on this page, haven't deflected it anywhere or dodged the issue. You seem to have a problem with the wording, I explained. You had a problem with the context, I explained. We're spinning circles here and I'm tired of you willfully ignoring 80% of whatever I say.
checking back just now and wow, Faddy, of all players, is accusing me of tunneling
I don't know what's richer, this or fat4all accusing me of shitposting
OK CCS can I get your read on the people who have votes on me
Flame_AC
Timeaisis
Zippedpinhead
Nudull
Who do you think is the scummiest out of those 4? This is important btw.
Might help if some of the seven people with no active vote put something down.
Long Live RetroMG, Magnanimous ruler of Gafia
Flame is a difficult one, in that I thought Terra was quite scummy but I've founded Flame less so since subbing in. Probably overall a null read, but still a bit suspicious of them.
Time and Zipped are my two main candidates if there's a scum among your pursuers. As mentioned before, Time is either town whose views happen to almost completely match up with the prevailing consensus, or is scum hiding among the majority opinion. Zipped feels a bit scummy to me, but that's a pure gut read rather than having any solid evidence to back it up. Not sure which I'd rather go with out of the two, neither are strong strong scum reads but I could well go for one of them.
Nudull is completely null to me.
I'm pretty much in the same place and think it is most likely that I have 4 town votes on me. I don't feel any of them have made a particularly bad vote either. My death looks like it is going to be most unfortunate if circumstances don't change.
Not unhappy with an absolutbro lynch, if I moved my vote from SF, it would go there
Ughhhhh. Sorry I haven't posted as much compared to when I first joined the game. Next day phase (if I make it), I'll be better.
I managed to get on and just wanted to say I won't (75% sure) be around for end of day.
Is there anything anyone wants to ask me in like the next hour?
Also, I want to point out that we're dangerously close to having a tie occur if we don't get more vote separation. (Not that I'd mind that though).
In reading, CCS seems flip floppy and Batsnacks is looking good.