As Republicans Concede, F.C.C. Is Expected to Enforce Net Neutrality

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't want a cable company dictating which sites get more speed and such, but I still do not like the idea of government needing to step in to "manage" things.

You probably would not be able to pinpoint WHY you do not like the goverment doing that, though.

Otherwise, you would have to consider this: corporations already lobby for less regulations across all sectors. So a law preventing them from doing so is exactly in your best interest, no matter whether the goverment, jesus h christ, or Kim Jong-Un makes the law.

The question is which evil do you prefer?

Except that there is no evil in regulations.
Without regulations, you have vitamin products not containing vitamin. Foodstuff containing unhealthy food. Services that are barely eligible for the contract you made. Ads that take advantage of your vulnerability towards them. The list goes on.
 
The question is which evil do you prefer?

Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.
 
I don't want a cable company dictating which sites get more speed and such, but I still do not like the idea of government needing to step in to "manage" things.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Could you explain what you don't like about net neutrality? We all get you don't like it, but I'm curious as to why.
 
Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.

And that student's name? Albert Einstein.
 
Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.

So you don't want the internet at all? I'm confused.
 
Neither.
I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.

That is a logical fallacy though. Some say that the truth lies somewhere in the middle of certain issues. Thing is, in most issues, it does not. It is easily determinable whether something is good or bad. Not choosing a side does not make you smarter or more right than those taking sides. (Not that you implied it, just saying.)
 
Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.

The point is that this isn't a "Choose side, the other, or neither." problem. If you don't have the government regulating these companies, they will fuck around with the internet. You're not being asked to take a side. You're being asked to stand or stay seated. There isn't a third option. Should you let these companies do what they want, or should you make rules to stop them? Doing nothing is making a decision.
 
It is pretty sick to see folks celebrating that the democratic legislative process has been stopped in its tracks by an antidemocratic legislative process.
 
That is a logical fallacy though. Some say that the truth lies somewhere in the middle of certain issues. Thing is, in most issues, it does not. It is easily determinable whether something is good or bad. Not choosing a side does not make you smarter or more right than those taking sides. (Not that you implied it, just saying.)

Well I'll be more specific.

Abortion. If a person was raped, and the woman doesn't want the baby based on the rape...its her choice in my opinion.

If a couple decided to have sex and suddenly freaked out because now they're pregnant and didn't take responsibility for the act of sex...im against the woman killing the baby.

Ultimately, all the issues come down to the actual event. Everyone has a right to own a gun, but there should definitely be regulations that keep those weapons safe. No different than if I want to go get my CHL, I have to go through specific training...they don't just hand them out.

:)
 
Please... if you are right leaning; do not voluntarily pivot the conversation to womens rights, rape, or anything even remotely related. That never EVER ends well, for anyone.

Please.
 
Well I'll be more specific.

Abortion. If a person was raped, and the woman doesn't want the baby based on the rape...its her choice in my opinion.

If a couple decided to have sex and suddenly freaked out because now they're pregnant and didn't take responsibility for the act of sex...im against the woman killing the baby.

Ultimately, all the issues come down to the actual event. Everyone has a right to own a gun, but there should definitely be regulations that keep those weapons safe. No different than if I want to go get my CHL, I have to go through specific training...they don't just hand them out.

:)

07e614927d673bb930df0f641f4cf407dc8ae119306e3814d4b214e6bcb5c75e.jpg
 
I don't want a cable company dictating which sites get more speed and such, but I still do not like the idea of government needing to step in to "manage" things.

EDIT: Govt forcing companies to actually pay salary employees their hours worked over 40 though, that's a solid idea. Companies making people work over time yet not paying them for it is complete bs.

Like with landline phones, electricity, roads, railroads, broadcast signals, water, heating etc...
 
People, we the people, will vote with our wallets.


Look at Sling TV...finally we get cable TV without a fucking contract to cable TV.

I would never want govt to dictate anything in the private sector.
haha @ you thinking the internet companies wouldn't extort money out of slingbox or else get shit bandwidth for its customers. net neutrality if the reason we get things like slingbox and netflix.
 
I honestly can't even properly put into words how much I hate my ISP. It makes my day to know they're probably shitting bricks right now.
 
Well I'll be more specific.

Abortion. If a person was raped, and the woman doesn't want the baby based on the rape...its her choice in my opinion.

If a couple decided to have sex and suddenly freaked out because now they're pregnant and didn't take responsibility for the act of sex...im against the woman killing the baby.

Ultimately, all the issues come down to the actual event. Everyone has a right to own a gun, but there should definitely be regulations that keep those weapons safe. No different than if I want to go get my CHL, I have to go through specific training...they don't just hand them out.

:)

I don't even know where to start, so I'm not going to.

latest
 
Well I'll be more specific.

Abortion. If a person was raped, and the woman doesn't want the baby based on the rape...its her choice in my opinion.

If a couple decided to have sex and suddenly freaked out because now they're pregnant and didn't take responsibility for the act of sex...im against the woman killing the baby.

Ultimately, all the issues come down to the actual event. Everyone has a right to own a gun, but there should definitely be regulations that keep those weapons safe. No different than if I want to go get my CHL, I have to go through specific training...they don't just hand them out.

:)

You're against a woman getting an abortion in that instance, so how do you think it would be enforced exactly?

Government regulation and "management"

The very thing you don't want, you want
 
Is there anything about regulating cost and packages?

For example, I only have one electric company where I live, which is govt regulated, and my bill went up over 35% this past January.
 
Is there anything about regulating cost and packages?

For example, I only have one electric company where I live, which is govt regulated, and my bill went up over 35% this past January.

If I recall the early word was that they would not regulate cost. We may just have to wait for the official terms.
 
Good lord Vapor.

On Topic, great news for Net neutrality and more competitive ISP options. I just want more options for decent upload speeds in my area without having to bundle some bullshit or go crazy with high download speed packages that are super expensive. Time Warner runs my area, but I am just outside of their boundary for good upload speeds at good prices, even though they have an office like 1 mile from me.
 
Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.
So don't want anyone inspecting food, the water supply, etc.
 
People, we the people, will vote with our wallets.


Look at Sling TV...finally we get cable TV without a fucking contract to cable TV.

I would never want govt to dictate anything in the private sector.

Hard to vote with your wallet when you go to any store in your town for a particular item and only one company's product is on sale in every single store.
 
So people are for govt control of the internet....great.....

Can't fathom why people are for this.

Same here. Some people actually want the government to take more control of their lives every day.

Well I'll be more specific.

Abortion. If a person was raped, and the woman doesn't want the baby based on the rape...its her choice in my opinion.

If a couple decided to have sex and suddenly freaked out because now they're pregnant and didn't take responsibility for the act of sex...im against the woman killing the baby.

Ultimately, all the issues come down to the actual event. Everyone has a right to own a gun, but there should definitely be regulations that keep those weapons safe. No different than if I want to go get my CHL, I have to go through specific training...they don't just hand them out.

:)

Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.

himZD0M.gif
 
Mr. Dietz said in no way were the Internet service providers trying to silence the Internet content companies. “They have a right to have an active voice in the public policy arena,” he said.

But, he said, the Internet companies in some case are misleading their customers, and in some cases, are being misled on the intricacies of the policy.

Yes I am sure the ISPs are going to explain the intricacies and how going the ISPs way will help the average consumer, and not prop up the ISP's virtual monoploy in many parts of the nation.
 
If I recall the early word was that they would not regulate cost. We may just have to wait for the official terms.

This is real disappointing. Then again, so wasn't my electric bill!

If it similar, nothing to stop them from jacking up the price of internet if you do not have cable also, or some such. Luckily I have both FIOS and Comcast in my town.
 
I would never want govt to dictate anything in the private sector.

Serious?

Workplace health and safety? Employee discrimination and treatment? Consumer fairness? Pollution controls and standards? Accounting and trading standards? General corporate liability, accountability, and responsibility?
 
Neither.


I remember in my college govt class, the instructor did this exercise where we were suppose to goto one side of the room if we were for/against gun control, abortion, etc...I stayed in the middle and refused to take a side.
Are you bragging about not being able to follow basic instructions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom