Sauce?xess looks like trash, it's even noticeably worse than fsr 2.2.
what does 'the way it's meant to be played' mean?
Genx87 Jul 25, 2003
It's a marketing ploy worked out between nVidia and the game's publisher. It means the developer gets nVidia hardware to work on, and the publisher adds that "Way to Play" logo everywhere possible. In short, it's just advertising.
I wouldnt go that far. They also get help in coding and compilers from Nvidia. Play Dark Ages on Camelot on an Nvidia card then a 9800 Pro. There are a lot of issues with the R3.xx cards rendering certain effects or just hardlocking. I was in the battlegrounds one night and this guy was bragging about his new 9700 Pro. "It was a sweet video card when it works" he said. Then he crapped out again. The poor guy took a dump 8 times in a single hour. Meanwhile my Ti4600 is working flawlessly and smooth as hell.
I believe some games, like NeverWinter Nights and Splinter Cell, may look better with one IHV's cards than another's simply because the developer didn't take the time to code certain effects for each architecture.
Ok you first stated it was a marketing ploy but then admit the game will probably work better on the card that the game dev got help from.
The game has comparatively light hardware requirements so most people don't actually need DLSS to improve frame rate.
Good to see that the 1440p specs are quite reasonable, this one should perform well on the XSX.
Hence the UK streaming rights for xCloud resubmitted to the CMAUbisoft lol. Theyd partner with the fucking devil if they could earn some revenue. Jesus fuck.
XeSS works on most modern GPU'sLocking away tech is stupid. What are you supposed to do, hot swap your graphics card depending on what game you launch?
I'm glad I'm not really into pc gaming anymore.
Not really. XeSS has better image quality than FSR and far closer to DLSS than the latter. I'm going by my own experience and there's a whole bunch of comparisons online. Its also hardware agnostic like FSR.Fascinating.
Okay that's my bad. I mean the standby mode, where you can just turn the console back on and start playing the last game you were playing. I normally only have one game on the go at one time on PS5 so I thought that was what that was called.I thought PS5 doesn't have quick resume? Or was it added in a beta firmware thing recently? If so that's cool
Same. I hate these exclusivity of marquee features on PC. It’s not some small enhancement like TressFX. DLSS and FSR are big deals that affect performance and frame rate across the board.Although a three way tug of war over these deals is going to get really old, really quick, this one doesn't seem like such a big deal. If we're talking about upscalers. I'm going PS5 on this one for that quick resume convenience.
What's the point of these deals? Are we supposed to own one card from AMD, Nvidia and Intel and swap them in and out depending on the game. These exclusive deals are misplaced on an open platform like PC is. Just offer the best upscaler/performance for a competitive edge, the argument for your card, not try to make a kinda walled garden.
After looking at a few recent videos comparing xess vs fsr and dlss on an NVIDIA GPU I can say xess looks like trash, it's even noticeably worse than fsr 2.2.
Not great. But at least XeSS has passable image quality below 4K, unlike FSR.
The game has comparatively light hardware requirements so most people don't actually need DLSS to improve frame rate.
Whatever you paid is your choice, nobody has an obligation to spend extra resources to implement something on an engine level just so you feel good about spending money.Why the fuck do devs/publishers think it is oK to not include tech that gamers paid over 1k
UPDATE
This article has been updated after Ubisoft confirmed support for DLSS and FSR: “You’ll also be able to leverage features like Intel’s AI-assisted XeSS Super Sampling, Nvidia DLSS, or AMD FSR — Ubisoft.
Hahahaha bullshit.After looking at a few recent videos comparing xess vs fsr and dlss on an NVIDIA GPU I can say xess looks like trash, it's even noticeably worse than fsr 2.2.