Fady K said:
Wow, sounds great! I was actually let down quite a bit by the first one, but i still loved bits and parts of it very much - the atmosphere, the assassination bits were awesome, its just that too much filler was forced on the way in many occasions, but looking at all your impressions, Ubisoft has made some wise decisions. Thanks for the awesome impressions, you are cool indeed.
I aim to please good sir. God knows how many good games I have purchased based on GAF impression... It would be great if I can give impressions which help people decide one way or another whether a game is worthwhile for them or not.
dark10x said:
One thing that I appreciate is the fact that the music seems to be put to MUCH better use. The original game also had a great Jesper Kyd soundtrack (though this one is even better), but it was used very sparingly to the point that most people never even noticed it. That doesn't seem to be the case this time around.
Absolutely not, you are 100% right. I would recommend listening to the 'heartbeat sounding music' when you have evaded the line of sight from the guards. Who would have ever thought that subtle trance mixed with mellow rock would work so well in Renaissance Italy?
They have done a great job with the music. Some missions have music which plays while you do... err... "your badassery" (not necessarily assassinations)... They add so much to the situation. Fucking amazing.
I should state that I appreciated this game so much perhaps because I thought AC1 had serious shortcomings. Just like Naughty Dog, I believe Ubisoft Montreal have outdone themselves, and I hope they are suitably rewarded for it.
For once, most of the things they said is according to "truth in advertising."
brandonh83 said:
I had the original on PS3, and then played a friend's 360 version and it was pretty apparent that the 360 version had better IQ. I actually had the PS3 version preordered, but when I read impressions of this one, plus my experience with the first game, I switched it over to 360.
Brandon bro, PS3 is fine if you are too extremely sensitive, i.e. you are a regular gamer who just wants to relax, have a drink and play a game. Unless you are looking for the absolute best quality you can get (which is understandable if you have all consoles and a PC), PS3 will serve you well. Then again, I had no issues with iNFAMOUS because I was too engrossed in how well the game played while TTP fucking raped me because of my impressions on image quality. :lol
Me: Image quality is pretty good, doesnt bother gameplay, I like it near water because it becomes 60fps and its really smooth!
TTP: Image Quality is shit, 60 fps is the bees knees, my eyes got burnt out.
Depending on which camp you fall into, it should be fine. I would suggest that if you want the best image quality, you should wait for the PC version. I cannot even imagine the HUGE maps running smoothly at 60FPS... and trust me, the maps are fucking enormous. So much stuff to do... Dear Lord!!