March Climber
Gold Member
C'mon man, at least @ me or quote me
StueyDuck
However, you have to keep in mind (and I've said this before) a lot of what you are seeing has already been ingrained in western US culture. LA, Seattle, etc where all of the creatives and tech minds are, were already doing these or going in that direction years, years before people knew about these three letter concepts/companies.
It would have, because like I showed before in this thread by listing some of their past titles, Ubisoft loves experimenting with their games. It's not my fault quite a few people here had a collective memory wipe once the DEI/SBI/Woke stuff started, like a clock suddenly reset.this game wouldn't have existed 5 years ago.
No, 5 years ago this would have tracked with their other dual protagonist AC games. If anything, this game is releasing much later than it should.5 years ago you would have played as a Japanese man
Origins is before Odyssey and Valhalla. Stop using it as the sole pillar for your argument as it's hurting your argument., much like how origins you played bayek for example.
The story has potential to be. Ubisoft can also screw this up. I'd say it's an honest 50/50.there is going to be nothing unique about this game
and your are kidding yourself if you think there will be
Pre-Origins AC, Post-Origins AC, or Post-Valhalla AC?it will be another AC game.
Yes, they exist. However, they are not some illuminati over all of gaming. Consider the numerous amount of threads here where people bring in their concerns about both regarding games that have nothing to do with them. That's what I mean by boogeyman. They are taking up real estate. You are shadow boxing. And you're not even aware that you're doing it.so what is your point with SBI and DEI? it literally does exist
No, I want to rationally look at a video game like a video game, first and foremost., but you want everyone to pretend like it doesn't, just because YOU don't care
They aren't new these concepts were around those 5 years ago. That's part of my point. They're new to you because you've just discovered them and now you're seeing them everywhere.Again you wouldn't have seen it many years ago because DEI is new.
I did and I think it's a mix of both. There are valid claims where a multitude of writers have trouble and have gotten worse in the regard of not making political points or certain stances obvious. One of the worst moments of Avengers Endgame (A movie 5 years ago btw) was when the female heroes all posed for the camera. That's bad writing and direction for a moment that could have been done more organically. Writers have really been failing (some even failing upwards lately) and it sucks to see.Have you actually read up on any of this stuff or do you really think it's just people who are like "Anti-vaxxers" and so on.
However, you have to keep in mind (and I've said this before) a lot of what you are seeing has already been ingrained in western US culture. LA, Seattle, etc where all of the creatives and tech minds are, were already doing these or going in that direction years, years before people knew about these three letter concepts/companies.
He represents himself within it, at least to a certain degree. Naoe will fill in the rest of that representation you crave.does yasuke really represent the era?
I think he is one half of a story, from an outside perspective looking in. Naoe is from the inside perspective looking out, the other half. It should lead to an interesting story if they do a good job of writing.so to you he's the pinnacle of a person who encapsualtes Japan during this period?
That's Naoe.literally no one else to base a character off or god forbid just create a new Japanese character?
You're right. Hopefully they include some of the other ones too.The man represents fuckall of japan, he was essentially curio, a funny thing kept around because it's strange, and by the way, he wasn't the only one either.
This will be an interesting subject to cover in the game.Many races were thought of that way by the Japanese during this period.
No. This game was rumored as a concept years ago. We don't even know who they had as a protagonist in their sketches and storyboarding back then. You think they made this game in one year? They have been working on this for multiple years and the AC that just came out was supposed to be DLC for Valhalla.we really going to pretend that Yasuke wasn't a pick for "modern audiences"
I'm not. You have a habit of making claim after claim with barely any proof nor do you even ask yourself the opposite question to make sure that you're not putting yourself into a conversational trap. If you want to be stronger with claims and conversation(and I prefer you be), you have to ask 'well why wouldn't' and 'why shouldn't' just to be sure of your statements. Instead, you see a catch-all answer and use that to answer every question. That would be the easiest multiple choice exam ever made. "The answer to every question is A" needs to be revised when you just take a minute to think about it.come on, now i know your taking the piss.
Because you're making an assumption.Like Ubisoft aren't even trying to hide it themselves.
Then why keep bringing him up?My complaint has fuck all to do with why they are using him
Literally everyone, Ubisoft and fans, all wanted Assassin's creed Japan. They knew it was their magic bullet. This was discussed since AC3. That game was ages ago. You don't think this was a long time coming passion project? You don't think they'd want to try and do a good job with this game?, again you have to really have your head in the sand if you genuinely think this was just a fun passion project