simpatico
Member
Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.It’s dual main characters. Naoe is also the protagonist.
Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.It’s dual main characters. Naoe is also the protagonist.
Yeah? There were.Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.
It's Assassin's Creed. Perfect historical accuracy has never been a staple of the series. Especially in Odyssey and Valhalla. Funnily enough Yasuke is actually the most historically accurate protagonist AC has ever had, considering he is the only one to have even existed.Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.
simpatico 's take is bad on multiple accounts, as he forgot about this:Yeah? There were.
Kassandra and Alexios are the descendants of Leonidas in Odyssey and he was basically a demigod. Historical accuracy in AC has been thrown aside years ago.Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.
simpatico 's take is bad on multiple accounts, as he forgot about this:
For the guys here trying to latch on to the 'historical accuracy' train, you need to find a new train/goalpost to move to. AC has always been historical fiction. It means they have (and will) make shit the fuck up.
Seems pretty accurate to meAh, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.
Don’t even bother. They will continue to gaslight and push strawman arguments to defend the game. It is all they ever do.It's the fact that out of everyone they could've picked, they pick the 1 black guy who was in Japan, with no history of being a Samurai over all those other legendary Samurai's.
Imagine a developer made a game based in Ghana and they made the main character a white guy just because 1 white guy happened to be in Ghana and knew some people during that time.
Fact check: A sword bearer stays behind with the general camp, near to the lord, they don't go out on the battlefield, and there is ABSOLUTELY POSITVELY NO RECORD OF YASUKE FIGHTING IN ANY BATTLE!
There is also NO RECORD of Yasuke receiving martial arts training, or use of the Japanese sword, either when in the service of Nobunaga or the years prior.
The truth is that his time with Nobunaga was limited, as they first met in 1581 and Oda Nobunaga was dead a year later. This is hardly enough time for Yasuke to be trained to be the great warrior all the Waukanda dreamers want him to be.
Yasuke as a Samurai?
Sadly, for either commercial purpose, or some social equity rationale, some people attempt to equate Yasuke as a non Japanese Samurai in the same way the English sailor William Adams (Pilot) was later viewed.
However Adams was actually presented Samurai status, and there is no record of Yasuke being bestowed similar Samurai status. The FACTs are that Oda Nobunaga made him a servant for a few months.
A few months... not a lifetime of service dedicated to serving his lord, ready to give his life in the service of the Oda.
Another fact that is clear; Yasuke was kept around as talking piece, an oddity for Nobunaga to show off, much in the same way he enjoyed irking other Daimyo by showing them Azai Nagamasa's gold plated skull.
It's the fact that out of everyone they could've picked, they pick the 1 black guy who was in Japan, with no history of being a Samurai over all those other legendary Samurai's.
Imagine a developer made a game based in Ghana and they made the main character a white guy just because 1 white guy happened to be in Ghana and knew some people during that time.
Far Cry 2 and Resident Evil 5 off the top of my head. A number of the Cabela games as well. Tarzan most famously. Probably some others.Imagine a developer made a game based in Ghana and they made the main character a white guy just because 1 white guy happened to be in Ghana and knew some people during that time.
There's literally a Japanese protagonist in the game lol.This is what I find most amusing. Been funny reading one of my discords I'm in where half the people are Asian (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Viet, etc.). One in particular who loves the AC games, has been waiting for his representation to be in an AC game for a good 10 years and... Ubisoft said nope, not today.
I've been just quoting their posts and putting them into my older posts on this thread. The talking points are cyclical and it's not worth continuously repeating.There's literally a Japanese protagonist in the game lol.
I won't come at you cause it sounds that you'd like it you sick enjoying Ubisoft games pervert
Welsh Privateers were a thing, even 100 years prior to the start of Black Flag. Read up on Henry Morgan.Black Flag had a Welsh privateer in the Caribbeans…
Not trying to be mean here, but do some of you actually play these games?
Welsh Privateers were a thing, even 100 years prior to the start of Black Flag. Read up on Henry Morgan.
Clearly you know as little about history as you do about the reason people are annoyed at this game.
It's pointing holes at the theory that every AC game protagonist has been the ethnicity of the region the game is based in. Not that there were no Welsh pirates.Welsh Privateers were a thing, even 100 years prior to the start of Black Flag. Read up on Henry Morgan.
Clearly you know as little about history as you do about the reason people are annoyed at this game.
Ding Ding Ding! Thank you Zathalus.It's pointing holes at the theory that every AC game protagonist has been the ethnicity of the region the game is based in. Not that there were no Welsh pirates.
A game based on pirates who were often not born of the region they sailed? During the golden age of piracy where you had French, Indian, Spanish, British, and others?It's pointing holes at the theory that every AC game protagonist has been the ethnicity of the region the game is based in. Not that there were no Welsh pirates.
FTFY too Claus lol.
you guys need to decide whether you are defending accuracy or not...People angry at a real person being in a game (lol at the racist dogwhistles like We Wuz Kangz) in this thread cause he's black and that's WRONG and not realistic. Meanwhile in AC Odyssey from the same team, you fought the Minotaur and Medusa and visited Atlantis lol.
I was clarifying the comment as you clearly misunderstood it. I made no claims as to any historical accuracy about piracy in the Caribbean.A game based on pirates who were often not born of the region they sailed? During the golden age of piracy where you had French, Indian, Spanish, British, and others?
That is being more true to the era than not. Seriously, do you actually know anything about history or are you just parroting the same tired gaslighting/strawman arguments you see elsewhere?
I was clarifying the comment as you clearly misunderstood it. I made no claims as to any historical accuracy about piracy in the Caribbean.
Keep the gaslighting and projecting going.FTFY too Claus lol.
Personally, I just want consistency in opinion (keeping the same energy). For example, if you're upset about changes to history, then be upset about the entire franchise of Assassin's Creed.you guys need to decide whether you are defending accuracy or not...
No one should criticize Ubisoft because yasuke was totally real guys.. but also they shouldn't criticize because minotaurs.
i mean can you make up your minds
Keep the gaslighting and projecting going.
Yeah I'm sure the We Wuz Kangz and We Wuz Samurais guys are not racist. SMH.you guys need to decide whether you are defending accuracy or not...
No one should criticize Ubisoft because yasuke was totally real guys.. but also they shouldn't criticize because minotaurs.
i mean can you make up your minds
also gotta love the "everyone is racist because they don't think the same as me" energy your response gives off.
i mean you failed to pick a side. are you team yay for yasuke cause he was real or yay yasuke because minotaurs?Personally, I just want consistency in opinion (keeping the same energy). For example, if you're upset about changes to history, then be upset about the entire franchise of Assassin's Creed.
Instead people jump through hoops for this one game and do the equivalent of this gif:
I would love to hear how I am apparently gaslighting you by trying to clarify another posters comment. Like, genuinely curious.Keep the gaslighting and projecting going.
Just calling people racist because they had a different opinion isn't the get out of jail free card anymore like it use to be.Yeah I'm sure the We Wuz Kangz and We Wuz Samurais guys are not racist. SMH.
Point is, Yasuke is there and he looks dope!
StueyDuck you already know me by now, I'm not a flag-bearer. I prefer consistency and honesty. So whatever team you want to try and force me on by saying that, feel free but you know I'm not going to claim their side. So if you feel that I am just making noise, you wouldn't be the firsti mean you failed to pick a side. are you team yay for yasuke cause he was real or yay yasuke because minotaurs?
if you can't choose a position the your opinion is null and void. it's just noise.
so if you are just this fun observer.StueyDuck you already know me by now, I'm not a flag-bearer. I prefer consistency and honesty. So whatever team you want to try and force me on by saying that, feel free but you know I'm not going to claim their side. So if you feel that I am just making noise, you wouldn't be the first
Do I think this dual protagonist storyline has potential? Yes.
Do I think Yasuke as a fish out of water protagonist has potential? Yes.
Do I think the battle pass is a good idea? No.
Do I think Ubisoft's reveal strategy has been good with this game? No.
Do I think Assassin's Creed stands as an arbiter for historical accuracy? No.
Do I think they consistently take facts from history and put their own spin on it to make it 'cool'? Yes.
Don't you find it disrespectful to the real Yasuke that they're going "no, his actual historical achievements are not enough, let's puff him up"?People angry at a real person being in a game (lol at the racist dogwhistles like We Wuz Kangz) in this thread cause he's black and that's WRONG and not realistic. Meanwhile in AC Odyssey from the same team, you fought the Minotaur and Medusa and visited Atlantis lol.
This, honestly if companies continue to stick black guys/girls in historical situations where they never existed then those game companies can just fuck off.It's the fact that out of everyone they could've picked, they pick the 1 black guy who was in Japan, with no history of being a Samurai over all those other legendary Samurai's.
Imagine a developer made a game based in Ghana and they made the main character a white guy just because 1 white guy happened to be in Ghana and knew some people during that time.
I mean, personally, I don't even care if that person is X in country Y anyway.This, honestly if companies continue to stick black guys/girls in historical situations where they never existed then those game companies can just fuck off.
Disclaimer before the woke pile in(won't matter anyway, will get a load of shit): playing a game where the protagonist is from Africa and IS IN Africa is fine.
Fuck off Ubisoft with your DEI woke shit and ESG funding.
No wonder Ubisoft is trash for the past 7-10 years
I didn't say this.so if you are just this fun observer.
Because those same people are listing incorrect information, false equivalencies, and fake narratives.then why do you have such heated opinions for those that don't feel the same way.
Based on the opinions of a certain part of the internet, and that's the problem. Like I said, 5 years ago this game wouldn't have had this level of reception. Many people here would have simply called it 'that one open world AC with a black samurai'Some people can see what has happened here
If true (I'd have to look this up to be sure) wouldn't that make this game unique?The AC teams have yet to make an AC game with a "Fish out of water" character. not one...
You also missed the above points.not even black flag. Which was a silly example because pirates and privateers were mostly European at that time and in that region.
but people are seeing a pattern, DEI is no longer an industry secret, these things exist.
Yasuke represents a person who was in the era this takes place in. However, at the same time he is being hailed as the result of a modern sensibility. If some of you cared about accuracy so much, why is no one checking the credentials of Naoe?So why can't people who notice that all of a sudden an AC game set in Japan which again, the franchise has always had character who fits into the era, now has a character that very clearly suits "modern sensibilities".
Your complaint is probably the exact reason why they went in that direction. Also they are already injecting fiction to him, by making him a super samurai.As we have all said, AC historically has never had real people as the MC , funny that all of a sudden they have it now for a game set in Japan, almost like they can use the "BuHH he WAZZ ReaLS" card for anyone who catches on to what they are doing.
I never said it was, also I kept asking for other reasons why, and the reasons being given are not strong enough of a foundation to justify this level of disdain. Myself and others here keep pointing out the holes in each argument. There's a leaky ship.This has nothing to do with the fact he is black
And again, I never said it was. Check my posts. I even told another poster a few pages back to keep race out of this, because I know that's an easy way out of a good argument on both sides.and anyone saying as such is arguing in bad faith because you know that's not what it's about.
Ah, the proud Japanese history of female ninjas. How could I forget.