2003 - it was a benefit show, I believe. Six hours long. Here's the card;
Anyone listen to Jericho's latest podcast?
Bray Wyatt calls in 8 minutes in.
WWE officials reportedly have "given up" on the push for Bo Dallas, which explains why his winning streak was ended by R-Truth a few weeks back. We've noted before that Bo was one of the gimmicks that Vince McMahon had lost interest in.
Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter
Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter
It really just seems like Vinnie is a child, viewing the wrestlers like toys he can just throw away
Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter
does it not occur to them that in a 3 hour weekly show you can have more than 1 or 2 main event storylines going on? i though r truth and bo were gonna be a feud which would solidify bo as a heel. they should have an early card summerslam match or something, probably for the US title if they had worked that out somehow.
there's brock vs cena, steph vs brie and rollins vs ambrose and apart from that the rest is just a bunch of chaff.
3 hours and they can't develop storylines beyond 'john and brock are ready to fight!!!' and 'dean continues to do the exact same thing he's been doing for two months'.
like very little actually happens from week to week, and not much more at ppvs. there is so much empty space and they think they've got the leverage to 'lose interest' in things that the fans are actually reacting to?
wrestling is so daft. i've been watching pretty much since the rumble cos i heard bout the bryan stuff somehow. i'm pretty embarrassed to be watching as is, it could at least be fun more than 15% of the time.
okay...summerslam, and then that's it for me. i'm gonna make a promise to myself.
Good. That gimmick had zero legs for the long-term.
Dammit why they stop doing that maneuver? Crowd goes crazy right there.Stop making me eat!
Who cares? It still had short term appeal. They could have let that play out before making Bo nameless jobber #843.
does it not occur to them that in a 3 hour weekly show you can have more than 1 or 2 main event storylines going on? i though r truth and bo were gonna be a feud which would solidify bo as a heel. they should have an early card summerslam match or something, probably for the US title if they had worked that out somehow.
there's brock vs cena, steph vs brie and rollins vs ambrose and apart from that the rest is just a bunch of chaff.
3 hours and they can't develop storylines beyond 'john and brock are ready to fight!!!' and 'dean continues to do the exact same thing he's been doing for two months'.
like very little actually happens from week to week, and not much more at ppvs. there is so much empty space and they think they've got the leverage to 'lose interest' in things that the fans are actually reacting to?
wrestling is so daft. i've been watching pretty much since the rumble cos i heard bout the bryan stuff somehow. i'm pretty embarrassed to be watching as is, it could at least be fun more than 15% of the time.
okay...summerslam, and then that's it for me. i'm gonna make a promise to myself.
Who cares? It still had short term appeal. They could have let that play out before making Bo nameless jobber #843.
Oh ok. Gotta check out the archives for this. Thx!!Devitt came out to it as a face for the longest time.
Why try to put over anyone? Why try to make any superstar better or more important? Why make the fans care about superstars, matches, stories or feuds?Why waste and feed guys like Xavier to Bo just to get over a gimmick that won't last longer than a year?
Why try to put over anyone? Why try to make any superstar better or more important? Why make the fans care about superstars, matches, stories or feuds?
does it not occur to them that in a 3 hour weekly show you can have more than 1 or 2 main event storylines going on? i though r truth and bo were gonna be a feud which would solidify bo as a heel. they should have an early card summerslam match or something, probably for the US title if they had worked that out somehow.
there's brock vs cena, steph vs brie and rollins vs ambrose and apart from that the rest is just a bunch of chaff.
3 hours and they can't develop storylines beyond 'john and brock are ready to fight!!!' and 'dean continues to do the exact same thing he's been doing for two months'.
like very little actually happens from week to week, and not much more at ppvs. there is so much empty space and they think they've got the leverage to 'lose interest' in things that the fans are actually reacting to?
wrestling is so daft. i've been watching pretty much since the rumble cos i heard bout the bryan stuff somehow. i'm pretty embarrassed to be watching as is, it could at least be fun more than 15% of the time.
okay...summerslam, and then that's it for me. i'm gonna make a promise to myself.
Man, coming up with a wrestling gimmick is probably tough as hell. If you have no gimmick, you have to be (That Motherfucker) Dean Malenko levels of in ring story telling. Too gimmicky, you end up like the fucking Vaudevillians, pigeonholed and destined for comedy segments. Guys like Stone Cold, The Rock, and Hogan all had charisma enough to distract that they were just really loud guys. Someone like Undertaker looks like he could beat your ass and he was damn good in the ring, so you can forgive his otherwise silly gimmick.
I don't think a guy in modern WWE with the short attention span of their crowds could ever get away with being a Dean Malenko. That was a gimmick that only worked in WCW because there was still that heavy emphasis on wrasslin even if the main card had interference all the time. The mid card still felt important where as all of WWF in the Attitude Era's midcard was all a joke. Was always a joke, and anyone who tells you otherwise is some insane Godfather fan.
You might think Daniel Bryan, but Daniel Bryan had a lot more than just in ring storytelling to get him over. The chants, the strong 'cool' stable in the Shield, the strong antagonist in Triple H, etc. Dean just got over because he wrestled. I don't even remember a single word he said.
Let's put our cards on the table; Bryan's heel work is what got him over. He was fantastic in the role
This has been a problem for 10 years. They aren't changing it. You are making the smart move by leaving after Summerslam. It's really a waste of 3 hours. Just read recaps like me. If a segment interests you then you can YouTube it.
Let's put our cards on the table; Bryan's heel work is what got him over. He was fantastic in the role
i'll just have to cut myself off completely cos i'll find myself allowing a little browsing in here out of habit and reading a post and thinking 'huh that segment sounds good' and then basically i'm back in already.
i mean this all started with me last summer looking up the undertaker's ministry entrance on my phone on the train home from work one day. and a year later here i am.
i don't even know WHY i want to see brock win, i'm just kinda sucked into the 'yeah...i want to see the bad guy win....' and okay, if he does then i'll try to take that as my final bit of entertainment from this gigantic time sink. and if he loses i'll try to take it as 'well, that's another example of why this isn't fun' and not 'but MAYBE HE'LL WIN NEXT MONTH' or something.
this topic is like 70% of the reason i'm watching anyway. i just need to cut myself off after the summerslam stuff and move on with my life and free time.
Tbh, the only reason I started back watching was WWE 2K14, and the only reason I bought it was because of this nostalgic itch to create myself in the game.
That's every Bo feud with that gimmick. Every single one. And if he changes gimmicks? Great, it's still the same shitty wrestler Bo Dallas.
I'm curious what kind of internal tools WWE uses to measure whether or not wrestlers like Bo Dallas are "over as fuck." I doubt they're just going by their gut instincts alone at this point. Surely they use ratings metrics, HUT numbers, web analytics, merch sales etc. to soullessly end careers.
What?
Man, I can't wait for every Bo feud.
'Hey Bo the crowd doesn't like you'
cheer
'Yes they do!'
boo
Oh my god...
I'm curious what kind of internal tools WWE uses to measure whether or not wrestlers like Bo Dallas are "over as fuck." I doubt they're just going by their gut instincts alone at this point. Surely they use ratings metrics, HUT numbers, web analytics, merch sales etc. to soullessly end careers.
this topic is like 70% of the reason i'm watching anyway. i just need to cut myself off after the summerslam stuff and move on with my life and free time.
Good. That gimmick had zero legs for the long-term.
Don't forget the number of SuperCard decks they are in.
i'll just have to cut myself off completely cos i'll find myself allowing a little browsing in here out of habit and reading a post and thinking 'huh that segment sounds good' and then basically i'm back in already.
i mean this all started with me last summer looking up the undertaker's ministry entrance on my phone on the train home from work one day. and a year later here i am.
i don't even know WHY i want to see brock win, i'm just kinda sucked into the 'yeah...i want to see the bad guy win....' and okay, if he does then i'll try to take that as my final bit of entertainment from this gigantic time sink. and if he loses i'll try to take it as 'well, that's another example of why this isn't fun' and not 'but MAYBE HE'LL WIN NEXT MONTH' or something.
this topic is like 70% of the reason i'm watching anyway. i just need to cut myself off after the summerslam stuff and move on with my life and free time.
Hey Cena's done this a bunch of times.
I only started watching in 2011 but if anyone here has seen 2008-2011 is the product so bad right now you would rather not watch compared to those years? I hear those years were pretty bad...Even for two hour shows.