I wonder how many of those that have pledged support for Gillard will actually vote against her on Monday, it's anonymous after all isn't it?
I wonder how many of those that have pledged support for Gillard will actually vote against her on Monday, it's anonymous after all isn't it?
Um, isnt Gillard beating Tony as preferred PM?
I dont think its a Gillard problem, I think its a problem with the party.
Is there a reason why people in marginal Labour seats are backing Gilard over Rudd? Talk about going down with the sinking ship.
It got to brisbane quicker! Mine is currently Departed Facility in SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA 12:22, sooooo it actually might not make it for delivery today
Your psn is the one in your profile? I'll add you tonight, hopefully on a vita
any labor MP backing Gillard is signing their own resignation from parliament form
they will be obliterated in an election, and no seat will be safe on the current numbers.
If the current numbers are to be believed its going to be 29 - 68 in favour of Gilard with 6 undecided.
According to SMH. How they got those numbers i'm not sure, its getting changed all the time.
I think newspoll is going to make a special concession and release their results on monday morning (rather than at night as usual)
Also Nielsen might have a result on sunday.
It'll be interesting to see how stupid the Labor party really is if Rudd still has support in the community.
Not for the leadership of the party. You dont turn the tables over everytime a bad opinion poll comes out.
SS3 get, had a 25% off voucher, so brough it down to $10.20, bargain.
I've already seen "Save us John Howard" comments on the internets. Hahahah.
Definately better off without Howard.Ask yourself, work choices aside where we better off under Howard or the Rudd/Gilard government?
Be honest now.
This post is coming from someone that voted Labour at the 2007 election.
Definately better off without Howard.
And it wasnt just the bad opinion polls that sunk Rudd, it was that the overwhelming majority of his workmates thought he wasnt fit for the job. And like I said, its a team game.
And it wasnt just the bad opinion polls that sunk Rudd, it was that the overwhelming majority of his workmates thought he wasnt fit for the job. And like I said, its a team game.
If the team would rather lose than win with Rudd, doesnt that tell you something about him?
If the team would rather lose than win with Rudd, doesnt that tell you something about him?
i'm down with some SS3 co-op if someone would add me to the steam group (steam name: wonzo)SERIOUS SAM 3 is $13 on Steam.
It has 16 player online coop.
Everyone should buy this so we can play it over the weekend. It is a fantastic game.
Kritz SS3 Coop Settings:
Friendly Fire On
Infinite Lives
Infinite Ammo
200% Enemy Health
Enemies Scale per Player
How to play SS3 with Kritz Settings:
Press W
Press left mouse
Get Killed by Friendly Fire
we're much better off without howard.Ask yourself, work choices aside where we better off under Howard or the Rudd/Gilard government?
Be honest now.
This post is coming from someone that voted Labour at the 2007 election.
If the team would rather lose than win with Rudd, doesnt that tell you something about him?
i think it says more about the self importance and greed of the labor power brokers putting their obsession with holding onto power over what's best for the labor movement. the fact that john faulkner's backing rudd says quite a lot about this whole thing.If the team would rather lose than win with Rudd, doesnt that tell you something about him?
I think Rudd would lose the next election. You don't think his personal brand has been tarnished enough at this point? You'll basically have senior Labor MPs campaigning against their own party if Rudd is in charge.
Tony is leading Gillard in PM preferred right now
thats what has caused this shitfight
SERIOUS SAM 3 is $13 on Steam.
It has 16 player online coop.
Everyone should buy this so we can play it over the weekend. It is a fantastic game.
Soooo, big ass storm expected.
Kevin back in the cuntry?