And all this under the technocrat Turnbull. Is he hiding now?
Holy crap, first the census mess and now the Nauru leaks. Sadly, the latter is probably gonna be brushed under the carpet fairly shortly.
It already has, most Australians couldn't care less.
Did it even get widely reported in the mainstream press?It already has, most Australians couldn't care less.
Holy crap, first the census mess and now the Nauru leaks. Sadly, the latter is probably gonna be brushed under the carpet fairly shortly.
ABC news last night was on the Census and Olympics, with the 7:30 report following up on the Census. Not even a mention of the Nauru leaks.
I'm pretty sure we saw things about the leaks on ABC News in Melbourne. Was that the local news or the national one on ABC24?ABC news last night was on the Census and Olympics, with the 7:30 report following up on the Census. Not even a mention of the Nauru leaks.
Wouldn't want to be seen as biased
Adam Giles has accused Four Corners of deliberately delaying its report on the Don Dale abuses to cause maximum damage to his election campaign and give a leg up to the Labor opposition.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-...es-'self-harming'-to-get-to-australia/7719450
Dutton being Dutton. What an awful excuse for a human being.
Ah, Giles, hopefully your entire party is turfed out of parliament come the NT election, because your mob being kicked out of government can't come soon enough.
And of course Dutton is an incredibly shitty human being.
I really hope the government keeps fucking up so the polls plummet and Turnbull gets booted in favor of someone who will inevitably fuck up even more (Abbot, Morrison, etc).
Poor Morrison has been bleeding political capital since the coup and being Treasurer. The LNPs real problem right now is that no one that the Abetz/Bernadi/Abbott faction accepts is going to do better than Turnbull with the general public. Turnbull's unimpressive performance allows them to pretend Abbott wouldn't have been thrashred (and probably unable to get Senate Reform through because his ability to get Senate to vote against things they'd otherwise support approached a super power).
Well, as you said, the right-wing are hopelessly in denial about Abbot's unpopularity, Turnbull barely saved the government from being turfed out after their first term, whereas Abbot would've lead the government to annihilation at the polls. I wouldn't be surprised if shenanigans happen, and the moderates get so fed up that they'd cross the floor for a no-confidence vote.
At this point I'm ready to accept a Duterte based Government.
Thats how much confidence I have in this Government and in any alternative.
Don't bring up the Greens because they'll never be in Government (thanks QLD for guaranteeing this), and some of their policies are beyond stupid. No nuclear power, effectively open door policy on refugees and economic migrants, reduced defence spending which will lead to China literally stomping us whenever they wish.
I hate the reliance on the USA for defence more than anyone on this forum but because we don't have nuclear weapons or anything similar to deter others we have to rely on them.
To be honest if the Greens changed some of their policies they would make for an awesome Government and we would actually move forward as a country but as they are now that won't happen.
I'm more shocked that the Liberals haven't had us withdraw from the 1951 Refugee Convention. I'm guessing there's a massive cost to do so.
Our defense spending is irrelevant regarding China. They can't invade with their current equipment and nothing we can install will stop them if they do have the equipment. They could destroy us, but only if the international rule of law is gone.At this point I'm ready to accept a Duterte based Government.
Thats how much confidence I have in this Government and in any alternative.
Don't bring up the Greens because they'll never be in Government (thanks QLD for guaranteeing this), and some of their policies are beyond stupid. No nuclear power, effectively open door policy on refugees and economic migrants, reduced defence spending which will lead to China literally stomping us whenever they wish.
I hate the reliance on the USA for defence more than anyone on this forum but because we don't have nuclear weapons or anything similar to deter others we have to rely on them.
To be honest if the Greens changed some of their policies they would make for an awesome Government and we would actually move forward as a country but as they are now that won't happen.
I'm more shocked that the Liberals haven't had us withdraw from the 1951 Refugee Convention. I'm guessing there's a massive cost to do so.
If there's no enforcement and no domestic political consequences to the current course then why bother?
Our defense spending is irrelevant regarding China. They can't invade with their current equipment and nothing we can install will stop them if they do have the equipment. They could destroy us, but only if the international rule of law is gone.
Absolutely, and I actually support a slightly larger military than we have now. China is of no importance in forming my opinion though. I mainly want Australia to contribute much more to aid and peace keeping operations.As a rule of thumb our defense spending is irrelevant against anyone who could and would actually successfully attack us.
It's more of a power projection spend (some good , some bad).
Our troops are well equipped and well trained but nowhere near numerous enough to oppose any one with the military capability to meaningful attack us. They are great for delivering aid, turning back boat , and invading countries on the other side of the world though.
Really as long as we have enough submarines to repel an invasion of say... Sydney Harbour it's damn near impossible to efficiently invade us. Australia is a logistical nightmare.
Absolutely, and I actually support a slightly larger military than we have now. China is of no importance in forming my opinion though. I mainly want Australia to contribute much more to aid and peace keeping operations.
Really as long as we have enough submarines to repel an invasion of say... Sydney Harbour it's damn near impossible to efficiently invade us. Australia is a logistical nightmare.
As a rule of thumb our defense spending is irrelevant against anyone who could and would actually successfully attack us.
It's more of a power projection spend (some good , some bad).
Our troops are well equipped and well trained but nowhere near numerous enough to oppose any one with the military capability to meaningful attack us. They are great for delivering aid, turning back boat , and invading countries on the other side of the world though.
Man, the technical reasons behind the Census stuff ups sure are interesting.
We don't exactly have any critical resources either, our resources are stuff that would allow for low tech self-sufficiency but we don't have huge amounts of oil or rare earth metals or other high Tech high value resources. And area for area our agricultural production isn't great compared to most places that aren't called Russia.
A Chinese company bought out the main Australian lithium deposit because they knew what the local owners apparently did not, that lithium deposits were only going to get more valuable as battery use takes off so instead of paying Australians for the processed metal they could just buy the land for a bargain price and dig it out themselves..
Maybe:ETA - What got darkaces banned ? Saw he was banned in the Narau Files thread but I haven't reached a point where he's said something that should have gotten him banned yet. I kinda miss having a Labor Righter around to go with our token actually liberal Liberal. This thread can get to be too much of a lefty love in for my taste at times.
Sexual abuse happens in all institutions, it's a fact of life. The sides aren't pro-sexual abuse and anti-sexual abuse, they're: We can reduce sexual abuse in such a way that it doesn't reduce the efficacy of the program, and we can't reduce sexual abuse without increasing drownings. I'd like to believe we can, but standing around crying about how racist we are for implementing a policy that commits evil through action to stop a greater evil through inaction isn't achieving it.
This is one of those times where good intentions isn't enough.
Maybe:
I didn't realise he was an extremist utilitarian.
It's a good expertise to have. It's a pity it's at odds with the tone of our foreign policy :\I want more of this - we seem to be good at peace keeping operations.
I didn't realise he was an extremist utilitarian.
He also seems to conveniently forget that the drownings that are lessened are just the drownings on the way to Australia. The people who would be making the trips here are still making the trips, just to other countries now. They're still drowning we just don't have to take responsibility for it anymore.
¯_(ツ_/¯
Jokes on them. That's not actually how Australian resource rights work (it's the reason CSG companies can force owners to let them build on their properties because mineral rights remain the property of the State governments).
Its not resource rights its working mines. The biggest lithium mine in the world (Talison) was bought first by the Chinese (Chengdu Tianqi) at a bargain price, who then sold 49% to the americans (Rockwood) and now they are boasting about it. It could have stayed as an Australian company.
Outspoken Libertarian crossbench Senator David Leyonhjelm is testing a law he wants abolished, after he was labelled an "angry white male" and "hate-speech apologist" by a newspaper columnist.
Lmao
I don't even understand his point by using the law. He seems to think it makes some kind of statement but I'll be buggered if I can tell what
Oh nice, Lily Serna. Likely for her environmental science interests that I didn't know about until now.Wow, Sovereign citizen Malcolm Roberts vs. Brian Cox and Lily Cerna on QandA tonight. No contest.
Prediction of show:
She works at Atlassian now too. I learnt about that before it was even official 'cause a friend works there and was like "Holy fuck Lily Serna came in today".Oh nice, Lily Serna. Likely for her environmental science interests that I didn't know about until now.