• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AusPoliGAF |OT| Boats? What Boats?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Arksy

Member
I'm absolutely astonished, I don't know how this budget is going to pass the senate. Now or when the new one comes in.
 
First they fucked us and now...

wjUTbnZ.jpg
 

Myansie

Member
That picture's gone viral because it fits into a growing narrative. Government for the boys. They're working for a small group of business elites who match the stereotypical men in suits smoking cigars.

It's not a good look to be celebrating cuts to pensions, raising the retirement age, medicare levys, fuel excise levys etc.

A doctor doesn't smoke a cigar after amputating a leg.
 
That picture's gone viral because it fits into a growing narrative. Government for the boys. They're working for a small group of business elites who match the stereotypical men in suits smoking cigars.

It's not a good look to be celebrating cuts to pensions, raising the retirement age, medicare levys, fuel excise levys etc.

A doctor doesn't smoke a cigar after amputating a leg.
Dr House might...
 
A

A More Normal Bird

Unconfirmed Member
I wonder who they've got lined up for the mint.

Also, just heard on the radio that the reason the Defence Housing Association does so much developing itself (and consequently makes so much money) is that the private sector wasn't able to fulfil its specific needs, so it took matters into its own hands. Clearly a prime candidate for privatisation.
 
I wonder who they've got lined up for the mint.

Also, just heard on the radio that the reason the Defence Housing Association does so much developing itself (and consequently makes so much money) is that the private sector wasn't able to fulfil its specific needs, so it took matters into its own hands. Clearly a prime candidate for privatisation.

I remain confused about how privatization is a good economic maneuver for the government in the long term except in a handful of specific situations (largely those where a government simply does not have access to the expertise to run these facilities at near peak efficiency but a private party does).

If something is profitable than privatizing it is a net long term loss, if something is not profitable then you shouldn't get any private buyers because the private market isn't in it to lose money unless the private buyers are planning to essentially pull a fast one on the public via an IPO, which seems bad for society (and thus the government) in the long term.
 

Jintor

Member
I'm fairly certain they don't care about the long-term at all. They just don't care. It's the most rational explanation.
 

Arksy

Member
It's going to be absolutely no surprise to anyone here that I like free markets and private enterprise....

But privatisation is a sham. It's just shuffling the ownership from a government monopoly to a private one. All that happens is that 95% of the time, service improves slightly, and fees rise significantly.
 

Shaneus

Member
I'm fairly certain they don't care about the long-term at all. They just don't care. It's the most rational explanation.
Obviously. Sell public assets, ZOMG LOOK AT ALL THIS EXTRA MONEY WE HAVE! NO MOAR DEFFESIT!, watch said assets turn to complete shit.
 

Dryk

Member
It's going to be absolutely no surprise to anyone here that I like free markets and private enterprise....

But privatisation is a sham. It's just shuffling the ownership from a government monopoly to a private one. All that happens is that 95% of the time, service improves slightly, and fees rise significantly.
BUT SIRPLUZ
 

Jintor

Member
Gosh with all the racket going on today I'd thought I'd gotten the dates wrong and the budget came out this morning.

Tomorrow should be fun
 

Shaneus

Member
Filthy fucking pig-scum.

I'm almost completely over just how much our country is going to suffer because of this government just so I can sit back and laugh at what happens. Thankfully I don't have a house/mortgage and I'm single so many things don't affect me whatsoever (or minimally). Maybe next time the general public will think twice about voting a government out rather than voting one in.

And those hard-right conservative voters. Fuck them, too.
 
It's going to be absolutely no surprise to anyone here that I like free markets and private enterprise....

But privatisation is a sham. It's just shuffling the ownership from a government monopoly to a private one. All that happens is that 95% of the time, service improves slightly, and fees rise significantly.

My bosses boss called me today since my boss is away at the moment and was fucking wet with excitement over all this privatisation. He has already created drafts for the Defense Housing stuff and is rabbiting on about how much we can bleed out of government contracts.

So glad I don't work a government job. They are so fucked. Been a rough couple of years for them :(
 

EatChildren

Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
Maybe next time the general public will think twice about voting a government out rather than voting one in.

Eh. I have zero faith in Australian society as a whole after this, unless there's a moment of collective absolute clarity and a colossal turnaround come next election or whatever. For all the shit Australians loved to give the United States after the likes of George Bush, this is the pot proven to be black. Their win is indicative of how dumb this nation is.
 

Yagharek

Member
We need a Convoy of 'Oh fuck, were those the consequences?' run by Alan fucking Jones tied to the front of a b double in a chaff bag.
 

Jintor

Member
Listening to the news report on the insulation stuff... I look forward to the commissions of finding in 5, 10, 20 years on our blighted asylum seeker policy
 

mjontrix

Member
It's going to be absolutely no surprise to anyone here that I like free markets and private enterprise....

But privatisation is a sham. It's just shuffling the ownership from a government monopoly to a private one. All that happens is that 95% of the time, service improves slightly, and fees rise significantly.

WINNAR!

My bosses boss called me today since my boss is away at the moment and was fucking wet with excitement over all this privatisation. He has already created drafts for the Defense Housing stuff and is rabbiting on about how much we can bleed out of government contracts.

So glad I don't work a government job. They are so fucked. Been a rough couple of years for them :(

He should get that checked out - might be a sign of affluenza.


Eh. I have zero faith in Australian society as a whole after this, unless there's a moment of collective absolute clarity and a colossal turnaround come next election or whatever. For all the shit Australians loved to give the United States after the likes of George Bush, this is the pot proven to be black. Their win is indicative of how dumb this nation is.

Yep.

So when is the AusGAF migration to Malaysia/Philippines?

Malaysia has 50mbps fibre, Philippines is cheaper to live in.

Before I'd have said Japan, but that radioactivity man...

Liberal MP is arguing that our minimum wage is too high on Q&A just now. David Marr is destroying her.

The MP is.. for once right. Yep, I agree for once with the Liberal MP. The amount of productivity we get per $ is crap as a whole nation. The solution in the short-term is a freeze (Not a cut, that has really bad long-term effects); but a long term solution is increasing capital infrastructure (Like the NBN) that would increase our productivity.
 
Listening to the news report on the insulation stuff... I look forward to the commissions of finding in 5, 10, 20 years on our blighted asylum seeker policy

Will never ever happen*, because both sides of Politics are knee deep in it. They only do these things when they either have no choice or they think they'll get scalps from the other side (and then they inevitable get caught in the fallout because it turns out corruption has bipartisan support).

*Unless Labor manages a string of screwups as bad as the WA senate reelection and manage to drive their vote share down enough make it look like the Greens are a viable major party i.e Never.
 

Shaneus

Member
Eh. I have zero faith in Australian society as a whole after this, unless there's a moment of collective absolute clarity and a colossal turnaround come next election or whatever. For all the shit Australians loved to give the United States after the likes of George Bush, this is the pot proven to be black. Their win is indicative of how dumb this nation is.
Blacker than black. This is the pot proving there's a colour darker than black, to be precise.
 
Yep.

So when is the AusGAF migration to Malaysia/Philippines?

Malaysia has 50mbps fibre, Philippines is cheaper to live in.

Before I'd have said Japan, but that radioactivity man...

Probably New Zealand before any other country tbh.

Similar country, cheaper housing, good economy, great people. Have been tempted for years now but at the end of the day this is my home, I love it even through the bad times.

Hard to come up with positives over NZ right now though. I'll get back to you later >.>
 

Yagharek

Member
Blacker than black. This is the pot proving there's a colour darker than black, to be precise.

Not too black though or else someone will put it on a lifeboat heading north.

I'm genuinely concerned we haven't seen the social bottom of this trend. Australia is becoming a nasty, spiteful, racist, elitist and socially Darwinian society.

Economy > people apparently.
 
Not too black though or else someone will put it on a lifeboat heading north.

I'm genuinely concerned we haven't seen the social bottom of this trend. Australia is becoming a nasty, spiteful, racist, elitist and socially Darwinian society.

Economy > people apparently.

This is always a danger when people forget that Capitalism is a means to an end, not an end in itself , and a lot of our employment problems with automation actually stem from that, with a lot of automation post World War II having gone into profit margins instead of increased leisure time.
 

DrSlek

Member
I'm struggling to figure out how privatizing the mint could be in any way beneficial except in the extreme short term.

Like, the government is paying for the maintenance of the mint and employment of workers right now. if it's sold, I'm assuming there would be some kind of monthly or yearly fee paid to the new owners to continue to print money for the treasury. But the new owners would need to maintain the mint, employ workers and turn a profit. So I can only imagine that the fee paid to the new owners would likely be greater than what the government is paying now to run the mint itself.

So I can't think of any way the privatization of the mint wouldn't be a long term financial burden on the government. Am I missing something?
 
So I can't think of any way the privatization of the mint wouldn't be a long term financial burden on the government. Am I missing something?

Privatisation isn't about the long term, it's about being able to say "see, we have money! SURPLUS!" in the short term and letting other people worry about the long term fallout.
 

mjontrix

Member
I'm struggling to figure out how privatizing the mint could be in any way beneficial except in the extreme short term.

Like, the government is paying for the maintenance of the mint and employment of workers right now. if it's sold, I'm assuming there would be some kind of monthly or yearly fee paid to the new owners to continue to print money for the treasury. But the new owners would need to maintain the mint, employ workers and turn a profit. So I can only imagine that the fee paid to the new owners would likely be greater than what the government is paying now to run the mint itself.

So I can't think of any way the privatization of the mint wouldn't be a long term financial burden on the government. Am I missing something?

See my post on who the advisors to the government are - then it'll make sense. It's not a conspiracy if they admit it in the about us Page!

it's Rothschild

It's basically a bad idea each way you look at it.
 
Every day i come on here i feel like i read another terrible thing about this government. The swings against them in terms of public support mean nothing as well. Sure they would probably lose an election right now but they still have so much support considering they are just going to screw up our countries for decades to come (if we ever recover fully).


Amanda fucking Vanstone was on the commission? Jesus christ we are fucked. Don't even know why i read political stuff anymore, this country is fucked and everything i read just makes me more depressed.

Commision of audit was full of shit about average doctors visits.

The thing that bemused me about this was not the (gross) lie but the rational it was used to justify:

This just goes to show how little thought this commission put into any of its 'ideas'.* How is it a fucking good thing to discourage people from taking precautions? How does putting off a minor problem, they could potentially become a big problem (involving ER and specialists) save money? Have they looked at the US system at all??

Flabbergasted that anyone this dense could be given any power.*

*assuming that any of this was done in good faith

I've said it before but as someone who works in an emergency department this just pissed me off to no end. It's one of those things that might bring in a few million dollars in the first year or 2 but in the long term it will cost the country tens of millions of dollars and who knows how much in lost productivity from people being sick.

It's entirely based on dumb logic. Anyone with even a modicum of common sense can tell you why they're position is illogical.
 

Yagharek

Member
I'm struggling to figure out how privatizing the mint could be in any way beneficial except in the extreme short term.

Like, the government is paying for the maintenance of the mint and employment of workers right now. if it's sold, I'm assuming there would be some kind of monthly or yearly fee paid to the new owners to continue to print money for the treasury. But the new owners would need to maintain the mint, employ workers and turn a profit. So I can only imagine that the fee paid to the new owners would likely be greater than what the government is paying now to run the mint itself.

So I can't think of any way the privatization of the mint wouldn't be a long term financial burden on the government. Am I missing something?

IPO is all I can think of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom