mmazurkiewicz
Member
Or you know, just about anyone at fault usually asks not to report if the damage isn't severe, and it had nothing to do with being respectful.
Or you know, just about anyone at fault usually asks not to report if the damage isn't severe, and it had nothing to do with being respectful.
yeah I know, I wasn't angry or anything towards her, just got the insurance info all the while she slips in little jabs saying it's my fault. While she played the usual reasons as to why not report this to the insurance company.
I was a combination of shocked and sad that my car was damaged like this. But I can't forget her little backhanded comments at me while all this was happening.
in an odd way I felt kind of foolish, because she almost talked me into not reporting it. Damage might be minor but given the nature and history of the car I would have been foolish to ignore it and handle it myself.
We went our separate ways relatively neutral though.
I had a couple of close calls in my old car, so the first thing I bought when I got a new car was a dashcam.
Are you in a no-fault state? Can you file for a mini-tort for your deductible amount?
Sorry to hear about your gtr man..
yea, it have leather actually. I'll definitely look into it tomorrow. no doubt.
also, forgot to mention, it is used w/ 14K miles though. Apologies.
My deductible is 2k, so I'm pretty boned anyway. Damage may be light enough where it doesn't go over my deductible, but the fact that it's a GTR might actually push it over.
Car drives okay still, but I'm afraid of long term damage if my tire/hubcap took the brunt of it damage. It was still low speed but I'm sure tires weren't meant to take impact into the hubcap.
The important thing for me is to get this done right, and make sure she didn't knock my alignment out of whack. Worst part is I'm leaving the country in a week on vacation and now this will be hanging over me for the whole trip.
It was oddly hilarious to see the Granny that hit me try and talk her way out of it - she tried to talk me out of not reporting it to the insurance company. Being that I grew up respecting my elders I was pre programmed to go with what she wanted, but ultimately common sense prevailed I wound up reporting it anyway.
I think she picked up on me being respectful and tried to take advantage of it. Despite how I look these days I'm still programmed to be respectful to the elderly from my childhood.
Absolutely disgusting behavior coming from her, but not unexpected from a scene of an minor accident, where the other party tries to talk their way out of it.
Not sure why you keep saying hubcaps. These are hubcaps:
GTRs have forged alloy wheels.
Post pictures of the damage at numerous angles and I'll tell you if it needs to be repainted or not. Check it under different lighting angles for dents and such.
Post it here.
Honestly, while not the best pics, it looks like there are no dents? That's a massive plus.
Try to polish the paint transfer out first. Inspect what's leftover. It may be a lot less than what you think. Either way, paying a 2K deductible is NOT worth it. That's not $2K in paint damage. Don't run the risk of hurting your car resale value because this will get filed on its CarFax.
It needs fairly minor repsray in that general area, any proper shop should be able to do it for $600 or so because there's no panel damage involved and no dents to fix. Regarding the rim, don't worry...it takes impact a lot worse than 10MPH collision with a plastic bumper on a daily basis. Have it refinished, it should run around $150-200 at most. Ask around the GTR forums for advice on California shops.
yeah sorry, not much of a photographer, I just ran down and took some quick snaps.
From feeling it I'm not feeling a dent or anything. It's kind of hard to see on a black car that's fairly reflective.
I do know a shop that works on high end cars who did some work for me a while back (proper skidplate install) , owner was a pretty straight shooter so might just take it him to see what he thinks and probably just get it done.
Noobish question - since I already reported it to my insurer (it seemed wrong that she wanted to just walk away from this and let us both handle this on our own, especially since she turned into me) ,does that make an impact to my carfax report? Or does that only impact it if I choose to pay the deductible? Or will the adjuster pretty much just tell me the same thing and I should just find a shop tomorrow to take this in and let him handle the rest?
Talked to allstate, they have no clue on the carfax question, but it looks like I'll probably be taking the out of pocket option depending on what the adjuster says.
Man...Audi's have really been catching my eye lately.
Is there plans for a new platform for the RS5?
Why would you want an AWD car in Texas?
I'd also never own another Audi ever.
Dealers don't do free nitrogen fills. It costs them money.
Why would you want an AWD car in Texas?
I'd also never own another Audi ever.
Why you gotta hate?
Speaking from experience. Had an A4 2.0T, A6 4.2, and 2012 A6 3.0T.
The best was the A6 4.2L...until it started having all sorts of electrical issues after 60K miles. And then the torque converter shit itself and I traded it in for a new 2012 A6. I won't even get into the stupid array of issues that car developed before it hit 10K miles.
The A4 was a downright disaster. Every conceivable issue it could possibly have had for a 2006 model, it had it all. Every TSB was performed. And more kept coming. It was at the dealer every 3 months, easily. The final straw was when we told the dealer the starts were weak and to check the battery...they said the battery was fine.
A week later the car wouldn't start as my wife (gf at the time) went to start the car after work.
Haha, this sums up the Audi experience pretty damn well.
I love the cars, but god damn they are finicky.
Had a 4.2 A6 as well and the torque converter went out on it. I was working at a dealer at the time and the 4.2 TC's went out on so many A6's and A8's.
Did you have issues with the 3.0T outside of the supercharger / coolant seals or whatever that was?
The transmission issues on the C6 A6s can be completely avoided if not for Audi's negligence and arrogance. The ZF 6AT transmission in the car DOES require 50K mile service intervals. Audi says it doesn't. That same transmission is found in many other cars at the time and requires service. Audi tells its customers that it's a "Sealed unit". Well, there's still a drain which you can refill by pumping oil back in it.
I recently found out Jaguar X-Type and S-Types used the Nissan JATCO 5AT transmission from the Maxima, 350Z, G35, etc. of the era. My friend who's an SA at Jaguar told me those cars have awful reliability because of all the transmission issues. So I told him my story about the old 4.2 and its ZF. He told me that the old trans Jaguar used would suffer the same issue and that it didn't require service. I told him the most reliable automatic I've ever abused was my 350Z which was a JATCO. And he tells me that's what the Jaguar used to use. And it hit me, when I told him that Nissan requires transmission service on that car every 50K miles, he told me Ford (at the time) and Jaguar called it a non-serviceable unit that had lifetime fluid in it. And thus, I realized why those old S-Types and X-Types had such catastrophic transmission failures.
As far as the 2012 A6 within 10K miles:
Considerable oil consumption. TSB performed, returned and continues to persist.
Faulty thermostat. Car started to overheat tremendously at 7K miles.
AC failure. Airconditioner randomly fails to turn on. First started happening early in 2014 when the dead of winter hit NYC. Shutting off the car and turning it back on fixes it...never stores a fault for dealer to scan.
There was one more issue, but I'm blanking on it, because once I got my 2012 Jaguar XF 5.0 and moved to Florida, I lease traded the Audi fully to my dad's name (I tried to convince him to lemon it to no avail). I think there was a bad sensor or something.
In any case, my Jaguar's proven to be far more reliable mechanically than any Audi I've ever owned.
Along with the service interval issues, as far as I know the ZF transmission was programmed from Audi to slip more than normal in the A6/A8 to give a move "luxury feel". At least that was the story around the shop when I was working on them. Those trans were replaced almost as much as the Allroad air suspension.
Bummer about the 3.0T. I always liked the way Audi's looked and drove, but it's a shame they end up having such long lists of issues.
They have some minor slip when you launched it. But if you gradually eased into the power from a roll, you could bypass that. Mine, by the time it hit 70K miles, if I gave it half-throttle from a standstill it would jerk 2-3 times before actually accelerated smoothly. One jerk at 1500RPM, then it'll jump and jerk at 2500RPM and then go somewhat normally...albeit you can feel the performance has degraded considerably. I bet the fluid in that transmission had churned itself into butter. I drove that car hard often.
If the TC didn't shit itself, I'd have probably had that car longer. For a while I considered getting a used 2009-2011 4.2L since it had the upgraded 355HP motor - but was concerned with the same Audi issues, so ultimately traded in old + leased a new one.
There's something about the way the C6 looks that I still have a softspot for, though...
Every time this comes up I feel like I live in an alternate universe.
I bought my B8 A4 in October of 2010, since then I've put 41,XXX miles on it, had 1 service performed each year by the local dealership as part of their maintenance plan, and besides that only changed the oil at 5k intervals (it does burn through it somewhat quickly) and gotten the tired rotated a few times.
I bought a better set of tires for it last year, and replaced a tail light bulb that cost $5 a few months ago.
That's it. Not a single "real" issue with the car in all that time. I'm basically terrified that it's going to start falling apart on me now, and I want to get something sportier (which is probably going to have just as many potential issues), but I'm pouring my disposable income into growing my business and saving for an engagement ring/wedding/honeymoon and don't want to go wasting cash right now on something I have that works perfectly.
Stop scaring me :[
Since I keep asking things, how are the 228i's? I found a used one w/ 3K on the odo, 6MT and Premium + Leather + Cold Weather and Msport on it. its a bit far, but it might be just the thing I am looking for. any opinions?
I test drove an M235i and it's the best car BMW makes right now. By far.
The 228i is quite a bit slower, but still fun, albeit overpriced imo.
Yeah, as much as I love the car, I'd rather go all out for the M235i since it allows room for modding. I can't justify 33K for a 240HP 4-banger.
I test drove an M235i and it's the best car BMW makes right now. By far.
The 228i is quite a bit slower, but still fun, albeit overpriced imo.
I test drove an M235i and it's the best car BMW makes right now. By far.
The 228i is quite a bit slower, but still fun, albeit overpriced imo.
hah, imagine when i spent on my 328i
Well it seemed like a good deal for the 228i to me. Though still out of my budget range.
M2 is right around the corner, bros.
It's about 18 months away, unfortunately. Won't be arriving until mid-2016. It'll also boast the same motor just more power and a factory installed LSD. The only plus it'll have is a true M suspension and gorgeous M-widebody work. It may get the DCT, but that's a huge maybe assuming they can fit it into the car's snug layout.
But I'd rather take an M235 work on the suspension myself, give the car a light ECU tune to bring it to the 380HP mark of the M2 and enjoy it. It's always more fun to do some of the stuff yourself, imo.
It's about 18 months away, unfortunately. Won't be arriving until mid-2016. It'll also boast the same motor just more power and a factory installed LSD. The only plus it'll have is a true M suspension and gorgeous M-widebody work. It may get the DCT, but that's a huge maybe assuming they can fit it into the car's snug layout.
But I'd rather take an M235 work on the suspension myself, give the car a light ECU tune to bring it to the 380HP mark of the M2 and enjoy it. It's always more fun to do some of the stuff yourself, imo.
Speaking of somewhat lighter BMW's, I know that I have called it the worst M3, but I'm really thinking about getting an E46 M3 and turning it into a turbo daily driver, fixing allof the flaws with the car (horrible exhaust note, not enough torque) and improving on the strengths (handling, weight) while adding a mountain of torque with E85 + super fast spooling turbo. I'm thinking I'd have 80-90% of peak torque around 2000-2500 RPM with the turbo size in mind. I'd be aiming for about 550-600 whp with similar wtq.
What do you guys think? It'd be a fun little project/daily while I save up for a 997.1 911 Turbo or C7 Z06. I should be able to snag the Z06 or Turbo in 4-5 months which is plenty of time to build and finish the E46.