3 more films at the filmhouse. Shitty rambling thoughts about each.
Miss Hokusai
A really odd experience this. While it takes time to introduce each of the characters in turn, it feels like these character dynamics have already been set in stone long before the film starts and the viewer is merely interrupting a story in progress. This idea is then reinforced by the unusual narrative which, perhaps because it is treated more a a biography, lacks any central theme beyond O-Ei and to a lesser extent her Father. The film is more like a sequence of hand picked individual stories from something larger but which don't necessarily strictly follow on in the same order.
O-Ei herself is a really interesting character since she's fairly reticent. Most of her internal thoughts revolve around her father while little dialogue is spared at all for the situations she finds herself in. Yet emotions still come across clearly despite nothing really keying you into them such as the scene where she finds herself frustrated that her paintings are superior technically but lacking in (in this case) eroticism.
I also hadn't expected the film to have such a supernatural angle to some of the stories. While a certain amount of skepticism is still present from the cast, it's unusual to see a realistic series such as that approach if with such a tone of "this is real, this is a thing that happens". It reinforces the idea that despite some of the vast being rather down to earth, their acceptance that spiritual and otherworldly things occur.
My one criticism I think would be in the film's score. For a film based on a series about nailing down a accurate portayal of early 19th century Japan, it frequently uses tracks with heavy use of electric guitar which jolt you out of the movie somewhat.
Empire of Corpses
The explanation given at the start was that Project Itoh wrote 30 pages of the original book before he died and his friend took over the rest. It's not stated how far into the movie this takes us but it certainly feels like a movie where after a certain point, nothing no longer makes any sense.
The central problem with this is that Watson's primary drive throughout the movie is his desire to resurrect? reanimate? his friend Friday. The problem from this is that there is never any indication why Watson strives so hard for the sake of his friend; almost nothing is given away of their background beyond the vague, hazy friend aspect.
In fact, the majority of the characters' motivations are equally either lacking or obfuscated in technical jargon that renders them incoherent.
The final climactic scene is an impressive, visual spectacle but with protagonist and antagonist shouting back and forth in nebulous terms interspersed with internal jargon that leaves you baffled what's going on and why things occur the way they do. Reasons and motivations are paper thin at best.
Some pretty obnoxious CG crowds as well.
A Case of Alice and Hana
Clements at the start described this as a great film about honest, teenager silliness and it's a pretty on the button remark. While the premise and behaviour of some people can stretch credulity, the dialogue between characters in the movie is really earnest and believable. Classmates talk to each other as you'd expect rather than belabouring the point in slower, more deliberate tones.
The chemistry of Alice and Hana themselves is really fun and engaging. While this is the story of how they become friends, they nonetheless act as you'd expect 2 young teenagers would act. Their silly day to day antics provide plenty of humour from just really mundane situations.
Lastly, the credits of the film show off to one side, a sped up retelling of the film from presumably the original storyboards. While there's obviously scenes which have had minor changes to the composition, it's interesting to note that the final scene is evidently cut from the film.