KuwabaraTheMan
Banned
All I can say is that I can't remember any particularly striking direction or cinematography from my viewing of The Wire. This isn't really a knock on the show - it's only more recently, with shows such as True Detective, where American TV shows in general have gotten more ambitious in the visual department. My favorite TV show in general is Babylon 5, but I would not say that series particularly excels in the visual department (though it certainly gets better after the first season!). The best earlier example I can think of is Twin Peaks, because David Lynch is a crazy genius.
Anyway, I simply don't believe that animation is some second-rate medium that can't measure up to live-action. If you were to collect all of Japanese animation and all of American live-action TV, I'm sure Japanese animation would have a higher proportion of trash, but that doesn't invalidate the achievements of standout works.
Yeah, I'd agree with all of this. Babylon 5 and Twin Peaks are probably two of my favorite American shows. Babylon 5 was no looker, although the story balanced that out quite a bit. Twin Peaks was just out of this world at times.
I think the most visually striking live action show I've ever seen is Hannibal. Almost every shot just looked like a painting come to life, and the direction was just phenomenal. It's punching on a similar level of visual breathtaking quality as Flowers of Evil in my mind.
I think for me, I don't even worry about how much crap a medium has, or what the average quality is, because those seem like meaningless questions to answer. I don't spend most of my time watching crap, so the fact that crap exists doesn't really detract from my enjoyment of the standout titles. Just like how the existence of bad CBS sitcoms or procedurals doesn't detract from the quality of the best network/cable shows.