• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Badly educated men have not adapted well to trade, technology or feminism (Economist)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed, the best way to earn six figures in America without a college degree, is to start a skilled trade when you are young and work your way through apprenticeship early.

How young are we talking exactly? Sadly there is a lot of pressure to go to college, which means a lot of wasted time for people who otherwise could have invested their time in learning a trade had the option been presented to them by their school/friends/family.
 
Of course, and why would they? Most people are aware that getting an education = a better and higher paying job. You suck it up and go through with it.

If colleges are hostile towards women than why are they graduating at a higher rate then men?

Two possibilities, either the reason I mentioned above, or they aren't as hostile as the media makes them out to be. Or it's both.

So either

A) they are a hostile place for men, and men just suck it up

or

B) they are a non-hostile place for women compared to the "media narrative"

You haven't considered

C) Women are beating men in enrollment, and then graduating at the expected rates in spite of any perceived hostility.

In your original post you claimed that men were avoiding uni or "checking out", I still see no data or surveys that support this.
 
The piece itself is...interesting. The longer it goes, the more it focuses on marriage, and I'm not sure if that's the focal point I would have chosen. But then, maybe thats a reflection of how, as one of them "middle class millennials" I'm not particularly concerned with marriage and I'm missing how important it is to the lower class experience

Well, our legal structures and tax code actively punish people who want to live satisfying lives outside the marriage paradigm (especially if you still want to raise children). Educated people with high wage jobs have the economic privilege necessary to overcome this disadvantage (yeah, they're annoying, but they usually can be overcome), but those with lower incomes don't often have the economic or cultural capital necessary to build functional economic and social existences outside of marriage.

Of course things like mass incarceration and lack of medium wage opportunities make creating the stable relationships that lead to marriage harder for lower income people than the middle class and rich, so they are really getting fucked by our society's inability to even start thinking about alternative micro-social support systems to support.
 
You don't think that new tools will mean that a job that used to take eight people will now only take five? And then maybe three?

Of course, just not in reference to the skilled trades. It only takes one plumber to wrench a pipe. You can't reduce it any further until we have a.i.

You are referencing manufacturing jobs, again. I'm speaking of skilled trades.

What tools are on the horizon to take a plumber for example out of the job market?
 
Even if this were true, a lot of people who complain about the supposed feminization of education act like it has been done on purpose to disenfranchise males. I don't think the cutting back of recess/PE has anything to do with some nefarious plot by feminists to ruin men.
I don't doubt that cutting back on recess has more to do with budget issues or schools not wanting to be liable for injuries or other mundane concerns such as that rather than some great feminist conspiracy. But the reasons behind the changes are largely irrelevant to the hypothesis. If, in general, boys do benefit from a more active a physical school structure but are not getting it anymore, then cutting back on those things will negatively impact their education, regardless of why those cuts are occurring.
 

Condom

Member
smh at some people that still can't accept feminism. It's as simple as equality for women.

Yes but we're not 'sexually' equal (gender). I'm learning that on university itself.

Women progressivly get more career-oppertunities, this however creates a problem for the lower earning men because they can't meet the demand of the career-oriented women.

The result is a group of educated women wanting to mate/marry a smaller group of educated/richer men. None of the women in research want to take on the role of main earner with the man staying at home.
 
So either

A) they are a hostile place for men, and men just suck it up

or

B) they are a non-hostile place for women compared to the "media narrative"

You haven't considered

C) Women are beating men in enrollment, and then graduating at the expected rates in spite of any perceived hostility.

In your original post you claimed that men were avoiding uni or "checking out", I still see no data or surveys that support this.

What post did I say men are "checking out" of university, I can't find it. I said they are sucking it up.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
Of course, just not in reference to the skilled trades. It only takes one plumber to wrench a pipe. You can't reduce it any further until we have a.i.

You are referencing manufacturing jobs, again. I'm speaking of skilled trades.

What tools are on the horizon to take a plumber for example out of the job market?

It takes a team of people to do something more complex than fix a single pipe in the basement. Or are we only talking about plumbers and electricians as repair-men? My brother just lost his job a few months ago as an electrical contractor working on new construction projects because the company as a whole was downsizing. I don't take that as evidence of anything other than that these jobs certainly aren't a "sure thing" and that we really can't project forward from current hiring statistics because of how warped the last few decades were for the trades
 

hoos30

Member
Indeed, the best way to earn six figures in America without a college degree, is to start a skilled trade when you are young and work your way through apprenticeship early.

Master plumbers, mechanics, construction workers, etc. All make upper class incomes. Like you said, they just aren't glamorous so elitists belittle them.

Some of the most well off families I've ever known have skilled tradesmen/women in them.



Uh, same is true for engineers, doctors, lawyers, etc. That argument doesn't make sense.

There is a finite number of jobs for everyone.

Many, many people advocate "trades" as a solution to the problem of disappearing jobs. Trades are fine, but they are not going to replace the millions of manufacturing jobs that we have lost.
 

kirblar

Member
"Women are taking over the world."
I would really hope that wasn't what you took away from the article.
Many, many people advocate "trades" as a solution to the problem of disappearing jobs. Trades are fine, but they are not going to replace the millions of manufacturing jobs that we have lost.
Indeed- what of the men who, unfortunately, aren't going to be able to do those skilled jobs either. It's the rising "Zero Marginal Product" floor problem w/ labor, and it's only going to get worse.
 
"Sadly" and "wasted".

Hah. I didn't realize so many people were throwing away their lives in college. Damn, I should have dropped out.

Sadly and wasted because not everyone is cut out for college. John Doe who did poorly in high school and then goes to college because it is the thing to do, then wastes 4 years partying with his frat and majoring in English while possibly going into debt.

College is and can be great, but it isn't for everyone. And some people who go to college would be better off investing the time in a skilled trade. But that option is hardly ever presented to them by their school or family.
 
It takes a team of people to do something more complex than fix a single pipe in the basement. Or are we only talking about plumbers and electricians as repair-men?

I'm not sure what your arguing here? I'm referencing all skilled trades. If you need a list of skilled trade occupations it's a google search away. There are tons, plumber and electrician are just two popular ones.

A dog groomer for example is considered a skilled trade. That is done either alone or as a team.

You seem to be forcing this narrative that skilled trades are declining with mechanization, and that may be true of some, but certainly not of all. Skilled is the key word in skilled trade it's generally a job that can't be replaced by a machine or mechanized, they are done by one or groups of SKILLED laborers. I think you should spend some time researching skilled trade occupations and then tell which ones can easily and cheaply be mechanized, then you might have an argument. For the vast majority only a rise of a.i. workers with genuine human labor abilities could put the skilled trades out of a job.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
"Sadly" and "wasted".

Hah. I didn't realize so many people were throwing away their lives in college. Damn, I should have dropped out.

You should check the employment numbers and debt levels for grads since 2008. It has been a waste of time for a great deal of people.
 
The education system, especially the universities, are now a hostile place for men. It's been for a while which is why men are avoiding it and checking out. I know I wouldn't go now, though I'd just do everything as possible online.

It's long, but watch & listen to Christina Sommers @ Hillsdale College from a couple days ago.
Victims, Victims Everywhere: Trigger Warnings, Liberty, and the Academy

What post did I say men are "checking out" of university, I can't find it. I said they are sucking it up.

My apologies, it was a post by Stolin, which you then defended.

I'm just saying, placing the blame for the gender education disparity on feminist hostility at the university level is an unfounded hypothesis with a lot of holes, the biggest one being that women are outperforming men on the regular before they even step through the door at undergrad.
 

Sol..

I am Wayne Brady.
The education system, especially the universities, are now a hostile place for men. It's been for a while which is why men are avoiding it and checking out. I know I wouldn't go now, though I'd just do everything as possible online.

It's long, but watch & listen to Christina Sommers @ Hillsdale College from a couple days ago.
Victims, Victims Everywhere: Trigger Warnings, Liberty, and the Academy

What in the fuck. I'm kind of blown away that someone came up with this perception of college. I don't even know what to say..but how?
 
I love the LolChristinaSommers posts already. Meaning none of you bothered to even take the time to watch the video that was posted.

Your immediate reaction is to immediately devalue and defraud what she is saying without even hearing what she has to say.

That's incredibly academic and educated of you.

she's been a broken record for decades. there's no value in taking down her bullshit over and over and over again. it's way easier to generate bullshit than to debunk it and the work has already been done in this instance. so laughing at it is the only reasonable action to take.


What in the fuck. I'm kind of blown away that someone came up with this perception of college. I don't even know what to say..but how?

CHF is a professional liar. she says the mindless bullshit neocons and MRAs want to hear and they reward her for it.
 
Also men being giant whiny babbys pretending to be victims of nothing

I hate their outrage culture XD

no one is more easily offended than the cishet white male. it's super hilarious.

Doubly so because they are usually the first to go off on tumblr faux outrage culture and what not. Look at the Bronson thread, or well any thread that even comes near feminists opened their mouths today.
 
I'm just saying, placing the blame for the gender education disparity on feminist hostility at the university level is an unfounded hypothesis with a lot of holes, the biggest one being that women are outperforming men on the regular before they even step through the door at undergrad.

Actually, there is nothing wrong with that. Maybe women are really better suited for the academic career.

But according to this article:
The parental-leave policy works well for professional women, many of whom work for the government, which is happy to accommodate their long absences (65% of managers in the public sector are female). But it has been a mixed blessing for blue-collar women in the private sector. Employers know that young female job applicants are likely to take a lot of time off. None would admit to discriminating, of course, but it is striking that 25% of blue-collar women are on temporary contracts and 50% work part-time—of whom nearly half say they would like to work full-time but cannot find an opening.

Companies know that women work less, but they are afraid of a feminist backslash so they shut up and instead grinding the life away of blue-collar workers on temp contracts. They don't give them normal contracts because they know that after a few years in these job their body is essentially a train wreck. What we essentially seeing here is that manual labor workers are seen as throw away garbage. And it is only brought to our attention because, in this case, women are the victims. In other words: feminism seems to only help the ones that actually don't need their help.

And then this makes my blood boil:
Jobs that reward muscle alone are not coming back, so men will need to pump up their brains instead.

It seems people have lost any respect for hard working manual labor workers. Not everybody can study math, what's wrong with it using other skills instead to make a living?

Again, it doesn't make sense forcing people who have zero interest in pursing an academic career into those fields.
 
I'm watching the video, and basically she's upset that people openly expressed their disagreement with her platform on downplaying rape statistics when she visited Oberlin.

Somehow she has taken this as an assault on her personal freedom, despite the fact that none of her talks were cancelled, and she was not threatened by the protesters or "safe zone" advocates.

Now I must say that I actually agree with her diatribe on "trigger warnings" in academia.

But I don't understand how safe rooms are hostile to men.

The next 15 minutes are her just expressing incredulity at various Feminist groups without any facts or arguments. Just "Haha feminists believe that we're living in a patriarchy, I told my husband and he lol'd".

I was expecting a platform of some kind, I'll see if gets any deeper.
 
I love the LolChristinaSommers posts already. Meaning none of you bothered to even take the time to watch the video that was posted.

Your immediate reaction is to immediately devalue and defraud what she is saying without even hearing what she has to say.

That's incredibly academic and educated of you.

It's okay MRA preaching the good word of conservative think tanks. Maybe someday you'll find someone dumb enough to listen to you.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
I'm not sure what your arguing here? I'm referencing all skilled trades. If you need a list of skilled trade occupations it's a google search away. There are tons, plumber and electrician are just two popular ones.

A dog groomer for example is considered a skilled trade. That is done either alone or as a team.

You seem to be forcing this narrative that skilled trades are declining with mechanization, and that may be true of some, but certainly not of all. Skilled is the key word in skilled trade it's generally a job that can't be replaced by a machine or mechanized, they are done by one or groups of SKILLED laborers. I think you should spend some time researching skilled trade occupations and then tell which ones can easily and cheaply be mechanized, then you might have an argument. For the vast majority only a rise of a.i. workers with genuine human labor abilities could put the skilled trades out of a job.

Yeah I don't think you are getting the point that I'm making: I've never said its about mechanization, its about increases in efficiency. I guarantee you someone (or three) is developing a software platform to make it easier and faster for dog groomers and clients to meet each other, which will increase the ability of dog groomers to process clients, which will decrease the number of dog groomers required to meet the population's dog grooming needs
 
First point she has actually made is about people ignoring inconvenient statistics. No specific examples given though.

Off topic, but it is kind of ironic coming from a right-wing think tank.

She just propped up the Civil Rights Movement as a movement based on good data.
 

Amir0x

Banned
The education system, especially the universities, are now a hostile place for men. It's been for a while which is why men are avoiding it and checking out. I know I wouldn't go now, though I'd just do everything as possible online.

It's long, but watch & listen to Christina Sommers @ Hillsdale College from a couple days ago.
Victims, Victims Everywhere: Trigger Warnings, Liberty, and the Academy

Utter nonsense created by someone incapable of taking responsibility for their own failings. You don't want to go to college now because you'd be comically unprepared to deal with how awfully you would do in an environment where learning is a crucial component, and conspiracy theories from the gutter snatch of the world's most intellectually dishonest anti-feminist don't thrive.

Poor men, poor men. Such a difficult life you will lead swimming through that mire of pig shit you trick yourself into believing. And if you can believe that, it's no wonder college today ain't for you.
 

ppor

Member
Yeah I don't think you are getting the point that I'm making: I've never said its about mechanization, its about increases in efficiency. I guarantee you someone (or three) is developing a software platform to make it easier and faster for dog groomers and clients to meet each other, which will increase the ability of dog groomers to process clients, which will decrease the number of dog groomers required to meet the population's dog grooming needs

But... dog cleaning cyclons!
 

Kevyt

Member
Utter nonsense created by someone incapable of taking responsibility for their own failings. You don't want to go to college because you'd be comically unprepared to deal with how awfully you would do in an environment where learning is a crucial component, and conspiracy theories from the gutter snatch of the world's most intellectually dishonest anti-feminist don't thrive.

Poor men, poor men. Such a difficult life you will lead swimming through that mire of pig shit you trick yourself into believing. And if you can believe that, it's no wonder college ain't for you.

Very well said. My thoughts exactly.
 
"Sadly" and "wasted".

Hah. I didn't realize so many people were throwing away their lives in college. Damn, I should have dropped out.

The vast majority of guys I know who went to college either dropped out a few years in and went to work in the oil fields or graduated and still went to work in the old fields.

It was a waste for them.
 

Assanova

Member
Not enough educated men for women? Then why are men having such a hard time finding mates? If this was the case, then I don't think the PUA industry would be as big as it is. I also remember online dating being very difficult for men.
 
Not enough educated men for women? Then why are men having such a hard time finding mates? If this was the case, then I don't think the PUA industry would be as big as it is. I also remember online dating being very difficult for men.
Maybe it depends on which men you're talking about. The article suggests that online dating WOULD be difficult for less educated men. Whereas men who went to college and had their pick of the greater numbers of women while there would not need to resort to online dating as much.
 

mr2xxx

Banned
Interesting but it goes against the other study showing that people have less sexual partners now than before.
 
smh at some people that still can't accept feminism. It's as simple as equality for women.

Wut, who? Nobody is denying equality to women. That is not the topic of the article.

The article is just idiotic. It boils down to that the average modern women don't want to have anything to do with men from the lower working class. And what is the solution? Right, men need to men up and start studying quantum physics to meet their demands. The article goes on and on how useless they are. And because some men can't actually meet those demands they are branded as "not being able to adapt to the modern needs", which translates into feminism, which makes them women-hater. It's ridiculous.
 

Mii

Banned
Well this thread got shit up after I walked away, jeez.

I always find this women are taking over the world idea laughable. Western men just never realized they actually need to compete at more than just sports.

Bigger problem is backwards men need to realize shit isn't coming them easy anymore. They aren't guaranteed anything anymore, which lines up well with much of what this article says.

Modern western Female culture has ingrained in it an underdog mentality where their recent rights were only earned through effort. Western male culture is 'woman make me a sandwich, I'm watching football. My boss likes me because we chat about the secretary's ass when she's not looking'.

Western Male culture needs to be shaken up. Don't want to be paid shit for working in a sewer? Then start properly competing again. Then you can work other jobs, which will mean a shortage of handymen, which will then push up handymen salaries relative to others. That job you have that pays you nothing can pay you nothing because you practically fell into it.

Women are actively trying to defeat the 'cool to be stupid' culture they used to have. Men aren't trying to nearly as well. Solve this problem of glamorizing stupidity and backwardness and maybe you won't be a bum.

I don't know why I even try and propose solving it, this set of circumstances works fabulously for me. Why? Because it's still true that women still have no idea how to get ahead (afraid of requesting salary bumps, societal views [however incorrect they may be in reality] that they can't be leaders) and are biologically disadvantaged if they want to be mothers (there will be at least a couple months where a man can get ahead if not more, a societal expectation [again, despite how unfair it may be] that they take care of the child more, a culture where employers are afraid of women employees as they may actually use those work-from-home policies HR created, etc. This all adds up and really does matter).

My real competition should be men, but many of them just fuck themselves over from just laziness and entitlement, no effort on my part required.
 

Assanova

Member
Maybe it depends on which men you're talking about. The article suggests that online dating WOULD be difficult for less educated men. Whereas men who went to college and had their pick of the greater numbers of women while there would not need to resort to online dating as much.

Oh, I am not doubting that it would be much more difficult for uneducated men. I am saying that it is very difficult for men in general, both educated and uneducated. Isn't there some kind of okcupid or match chart that shows how unlikely women are to respond to messages in general? I just think it is really interesting that women continue to reject men at such high rates when in reality, the odds are stacked against them. There has to be more to the story than just income and education.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
This weird new class of men claiming victimhood is absolutely confounding to me. I guess we didn't used to meet them because they were shut-ins who didn't actually interact much in society, but now they have the internet where they can act like a fully formed person instead of a misanthrope with woman issues who nobody wants to interact with.

It's also the precise opposite of the path they should be taking to success. If you assume a lot of them would actually be interested in having relationships, normal relationships with normal women, then this cesspit of fear and loathing they're wading through is in the wrong direction, and they're having all their deepest resentment compounded and enabled by like minded (mostly online) cultures.
 
She blames the proliferation of "rape culture" dogma on social media and a 2010 NPR/Center for Public Integrity media report on rape.

A quick search around the web and I found this, a more detailed take on her beef with NPR and Title IX.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/23/the-media-is-making-college-rape-culture-worse.html

After having read it and seen her talk in its entirety, this is pretty much the only salient point she has made.

She concludes her talk by comparing modern liberal college campuses to 1984's Junior Anti-Sex league. Really.

I'm still not seeing how beef with Title IX is driving men away from higher education.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Yeah no.

Utter bullshit.

This is just what people like him must tell themselves in order to continue to live in a world where they're painfully inadequate at competing at the level so many modern women are. If they don't make up some laughably pathetic excuse for their failings, they won't be able to continue living soundly.
 
This is just what people like him must tell themselves in order to continue to live in a world where they're painfully inadequate at competing at the level so many modern women are. If they don't make up some laughably pathetic excuse for their failings, they won't be able to continue living soundly.

I see, so now is every 'simpler' men with a blue-collar job a failure. Nice high horse you have there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom