Battlefield 6 Beta |OT| Open Beta/Closed Weapons.

Sad In A Box GIF


EKyBZQ4iHdec0V2r.jpg


 
Last edited:
ebevan91 said:
I hated the idea of having to launch the game via a browser but I loved the stats tracking part of it. I loved how in depth the stats were. I just looked at my BF3 and BF4 stats and I really haven't improved at all over the years :messenger_grinning_sweat:
Click to expand...
Oh shit, I didn't know you could still see them. BRB.
 
FIREKNIGHT2029 said:
:messenger_tears_of_joy: How do I have a better K/D than this aimbot cheater? I was also using the LMG most of the beta and so my accuracy is low, around 10%, with such god-like reflexes their shot accuracy should blow mine out of the water. I wonder how terrible their stats would be without the use of aimbots.
Click to expand...

Weird confirmation bias take. Rather, I think the stats instead add clear credence to the alternative argument that says they were never cheating.
 
DirtInUrEye said:
Weird confirmation bias take. Rather, I think the stats instead add clear credence to the alternative argument that says they were never cheating.
Click to expand...
2+2 is a bridge too far for some.

Twitch unbanned so people can now look at full VODs themselves if they really want. Spoiler alert, the guy fast flicks everywhere 90 percent of the time whether for aim or movement, and randomly sprays at nothing all the time only occasionally hitting 'clips'.
 
Avid Reading Horse said:
2+2 is a bridge too far for some.

Twitch unbanned so people can now look at full VODs themselves if they really want. Spoiler alert, the guy fast flicks everywhere 90 percent of the time whether for aim or movement, and randomly sprays at nothing all the time only occasionally hitting 'clips'.
Click to expand...

Exactly as Enders described.
 
Luipadre said:
You can get your weekend 1 stats from this website
Click to expand...
not amused about it

it is another clue about what EA want from this, to feed the sweat community into stat-wars (even more than it already is)

combine that with open weapons and the uber-possible "this is meta" videos tiktoks etc (there are already video like this and even tierlist lol, for a beta)...

now add to open weapons the possible "AEK of BF6" situation and everything is beginning to feel less and less compelling to me
 
Last edited:
G-DannY said:
not amused about it

it is another clue about what EA want from this, to feed the sweat community into stat-wars (even more than it already is)

combine that with open weapons and the uber-possible "this is meta" videos tiktoks etc (there are already video like this and even tierlist lol, for a beta)...

now add to open weapons the possible "AEK of BF6" situation and everything is beginning to feel less and less compelling to me
Click to expand...
I don't like that win/loss isn't on there, that's by far the most important stat. And I have almost a 2 k/d on the beta playing a medic.
 
ValiantInstance said:
I don't like that win/loss isn't on there, that's by far the most important stat. And I have almost a 2 k/d on the beta playing a medic.
Click to expand...

that's because with matchmaking that will hover around 50% no matter what i think

the most important individual stat in BF in general shoud be SQUADPOINTS PER GAME

though it does not exist
 
Last edited:
G-DannY said:
that's because with matchmaking that will hover around 50% no matter what i think

the most important individual stat in BF in general shoud be SQUADPOINTS PER GAME

though it does not exist
Click to expand...
The matchmaking certainly isn't skill based. I can count the amount of booty sliding sweats I've encountered on one hand. They do use team balancing though.
 
G-DannY said:
not amused about it

it is another clue about what EA want from this, to feed the sweat community into stat-wars (even more than it already is)

combine that with open weapons and the uber-possible "this is meta" videos tiktoks etc (there are already video like this and even tierlist lol, for a beta)...

now add to open weapons the possible "AEK of BF6" situation and everything is beginning to feel less and less compelling to me
Click to expand...
Because this is the first battlefield game with detailed statistics direct from Dice/EA
Judge Judy Eye Roll GIF
 
ValiantInstance said:
You'll play what they give you, it's a free beta. They're obviously keeping a lot back to convince people to part with their money for the full game.
Click to expand...
How does that make any sense? "Convince" people who want bigger maps by not giving them a chance to try any out? And honestly, looking at the map list, there's like 2 big maps at launch, Mirak Valley and Operation Firestorm. Not enough IMO.
 
Jakk said:
How does that make any sense? "Convince" people who want bigger maps by not giving them a chance to try any out? And honestly, looking at the map list, there's like 2 big maps at launch, Mirak Valley and Operation Firestorm. Not enough IMO.
Click to expand...
I think the devs know that the battlefield hardcore, who enjoy the huge maps, will be buying it day 1 regardless. They are trying to entice the casual/cod gamer with these betas. It is very apparent with the NYC map. Feels like I am playing cod. Not a fan of it, especially playing conquest
 
Last edited:
SatansReverence said:
Yet you have a cry about them providing stats after the first weekend.

Are you being deliberately obtuse?
Click to expand...

it's not the stats by themselves, it's what stats you focus on (just starting from the beta) and even badly the "click here to share your stats" button on the bottom of the page

i hope the sweat have not flooded your brain enough to prevent you to catch the difference, but i'm not really confident about it unfortunately
 
Last edited:
MicTyson said:
I see a lot of people praising this game for its Battlefield 3 roots. I thought BF3 sucked and was when the series started playing like a COD game. The other Battlefields after must have really sucked if people are rejoicing about 3, I never played another one after 3.

Is it still fast paced gameplay that forces you into choke points non stop?

I played the ever loving shit out of BFBC2 and love the slow style gameplay and completely open maps where you could level everything.
Click to expand...

This is me. I hate how bf3 turned cody. Bf6, so far, the beta, plays worse than bf3. The need to heal and repairs and other none gunplay actions, is virtually discouraged

I don't think you will like it, definitely dont pay full price without trying the demo
 
Last edited:
G-DannY said:
it's not the stats by themselves, it's what stats you focus on and even badly the "click here to share your stats" button on the bottom of the page

i hope the sweat have not flooded your brain enough to prevent you to catch the difference
Click to expand...

Oh no, the stat page for a 2 weekend beta isn't fully detailed. The horror.

And you can now click a share button instead of simply taking a screenshot first. Dice absolutely doing everything for the "sweats"

The Office Reaction GIF
 
ValiantInstance said:
You'll play what they give you, it's a free beta. They're obviously keeping a lot back to convince people to part with their money for the full game.
Click to expand...
Nope. I like the big maps and was playing this as it was a demo on what to expect. If it had some big map that wouldve been my taste I might have bought it. Now I wont, even after release, because Im not sure I'll like the game even with big maps.

Unless they give like a hour free trial or something.
 
DirtInUrEye said:
Nah you're going to buy it anyway.
Click to expand...
Nope. 2042 was actually the first and only battlefield I bought. I didn't think it was complete shit. I have never bought a COD in my life and won't be buying this before I get to play a bigger map at least. At this point that won't happen so no buy from me.

I hardly ever buy games anyway. I actually played only about 5 full games in the beta and the chaos of it didn't click at all. I'll try again this weekend but probably will drop it again fast.
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see them offer 48 player playlists just to see how a lower player count plays on these maps. It should help to reduce the feeling of being in a meat grinder but it could make the maps feel too sparse. But I'd like to see them offer it as an experiment to see how it plays.
 
Last edited:
Zuzu said:
I'd like to see them offer 48 player playlists just to see how a lower player count plays on these maps. It should help to reduce the feeling of being in a meat grinder but it could make the maps feel too sparse. But I'd like to see them offer it as an experiment to see how it plays.
Click to expand...

48 player on Cairo and the other urban map, would work great imo
 
bruh how is the hitreg even WORSE? getting 15 hit markers only for dudes to turn around and insta kill me. Fucking xbox 360 online-feeling bullshit.
 
peish said:
This is me. I hate how bf3 turned cody. Bf6, so far, the beta, plays worse than bf3. The need to heal and repairs and other none gunplay actions, is virtually discouraged

I don't think you will like it, definitely dont pay full price without trying the demo
Click to expand...
I wish someone else would make a true BF42 or even BF2 clone. Those were the good games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Battlefield 6's Open Beta will feature a separate playlist option with Weapons locked to a specific class
2
67
1K
Ocean Dweller replied
Battlefield 6 Open Beta Starts with 330k concurrent players
Social News  2
92
2K
VAVA Mk2 replied
Digital Foundry: Battlefield 6 Open Beta Tested - Performance, Features + More - PS5/PS5 Pro/Xbox Series X|S
2 3
103
3K
Zathalus replied
Battlefield 6 Servers full and has a queue ahead of beta launch . . .
15
993
MiguelItUp replied
Wildgate - Release Date & Open Beta Trailer
Trailer 
26
700
SomeNorseGuy replied
Top Bottom