Except under your small government fantasy scenarios, there'd be no public transit.
Then what?
But I'm getting off topic slightly. As for BART, it should be non-unionized. It should be illegal for transit workers to strike, and if they walk off the job, they should be immediately fired.
So, you want to lower their pay, remove their benefits, and make it illegal for them to bargain with their employer. Yeah, that'll work out wonderfully.
I'm not even getting into your dream world where I have to pay a toll every five blocks because the 'owner' of the road went from TollCo to RoadCorp.
I want them to compete like any other non-unionized worker does. And them holding the whole city hostage is Bond villain-esque in their greed.
I want them to compete like any other non-unionized worker does. And them holding the whole city hostage is Bond villain-esque in their greed.
Even given everything you say as fact, you are comparing the reality of public transportation with the fantasy of ideal capitalism. Why not be fair and compare reality to the crony capitalism that would prevail? I mean don't get me wrong privatized jails have worked out amazingly so clearly crony capitalism should always get the benefit of the doubt having proven itself so well.
If the subsidies were dropped and regulations dropped, we could conceivably have private mass transit. Our transportation system is fucked. I'd like to see most of it turn private - including freeways.
Why? The private sector operates on profit. If it sees profit from adding a line here and there, it'll find a way to do it. An example - The route from Orange County to Riverside. Currently it's just the 91 to the 15, or taking the treacherous pass through the Ortegas. I mean treacherous literally, it's one of the deadliest highways in California with over 130 turns.
Private highways and private mass transit would be nightmare in this country.
He's fallen into the "if it's efficient and will cost less, than it's better" trap of libertarianism. Even accepting the fact that a private road or mass transit system would be more efficient, the question is, is for example, a 10% efficiency gain worth the loss of convenience for the population?
After all, let's say there's 10 companies who each own sections of roads and everybody has to install an EZ-Pass type of thing in order to drive the roads unless you want to pay tolls to go through various neighborhoods.
Now, what if Company X decided, "we're going to stop taking the EZ Pass system and instead, you not only have to use our pass system, but we're jacking up rates by 20%. In a market, yes, they would be hurt, possibly. But, you can't have six companies owning the same stretch of road. If Company X owns the Golden Gate Bridge, they have a far more bigger hold over the population than BART workers do. Why do I know this would likely eventually happen? Because it happens already with things like stadiums and proposals for companies to move jobs.
Basically, markets work pretty well when there's no massive downside if the company in charge are giant assholes and it's convenient for their to be multiple suppliers. Nike charges too much for shoes? Well, there's plenty of other shoe companies. Apple charges more than the average for computers? Yeah, but they're high quality and there's a market for them.
However, in things that we all _need_ access too, whether it's transportation, health care, or social welfare, choice is a bad thing. We don't need six buses going from Point A to Point B. We need one well funded bus that isn't going to get cut if the profit margin drops by 10%. We don't need 12 options for our Social Security. We need our Social Security checks to come when we're 65. That's the whole point of 'the commons.'
If you work at a manufacturing plant, and your union wants to strike, it doesn't have an immediate impact on other people being able to go about their lives such as getting to/from work, school or medial appointments. In the case of a BART strike, they are messing with 400,000+ people's lives to varying degrees. It is not acceptable to me.allowing public unions to strike is a mistake. It's not in the public interest for the public to be harmed as part of the government's negotiation process with its employees. Work at BART, negotiate your compensation and other aspects of your job, and if they aren't acceptable, then leave. The point of government services is not to provide jobs that are acceptable to you; it's to provide services to the public.
Even FDR, a union champion, was against public unions.
If the subsidies were dropped and regulations dropped, we could conceivably have private mass transit. Our transportation system is fucked. I'd like to see most of it turn private - including freeways.
It's a public good. A lot of cities wouldn't have mass transit if it was private. Our city recovers only 11% of it's operating costs through the farebox. If we didn't pay for it out of property taxes, it'd probably cost 10$ to go six miles in a bus. Kind of defeats the point of mass transit.
Also, private freeways? Uh, no toll booths, kthnx. Rather pay the tax on gas to not have to stop over and over again. There's nothing stopping a private company from building a highway, they can just buy up land and put a road on it.
Not getting into this union debate, but how is everyone else getting around today? Luckily my girlfriend and I have one car, but we do work about 40 miles apart from each other. So we are carpooling with lots if wasted time and gas.
I got into work about a half hour ago. Traffic in SF proper isn't too bad, it's just all of the routes into the city that are screwed. Bay Bridge is a mess headed westbound but eastbound isn't bad at all.
Glad to hear that AC Transit didn't opt for the simultaneous strike this morning because that would have significantly compounded the problem.
Looks like I'll be working from home this week. I feel sorry for the people who can't.
Closed turnstiles at the Powell BART Station in downtown San Francisco early on Monday, July 1, 2013, the first day of the first BART strike since 1997. Roughly 400,000 thousand riders were stranded by the strike. Photo: Will Kane, The Chronicle
That'll get you to Treasure Island from the East Bay, but there's currently no route from TI to SF on the West span of the Bay Bridge.Too bad the bike lane on the Bay Bridge doesn't open for another couple months. That would have been a great alternative for some people.
That'll get you to Treasure Island from the East Bay, but there's currently no route from TI to SF on the West span of the Bay Bridge.
this is going to be terrible.
Is the transbay bus going to be running?
I just moved to San Jose last week, and start my job next week in Mountain View. Do you think the strike will a) still be in effect and b) affect my commute?So I commuted via MUNI from my uncle's place in Daly City (took the 14L) and it wasn't too bad actually - just long.
Got on roughly 6:45 or so and reached Mission & Fremont at 7:40 this morning. Then it was a nice 10 minute walk to my office (though I took a detour to Walgreens for some water). Still arrived before I was supposed to start my scheduled shift, which was at 8:30.
Tomorrow should be interesting as I'll be driving from Daly City to my office, since I'm taking a half day but I'm hoping traffic going back to the East Bay around lunchtime should be on the light side.
I just moved to San Jose last week, and start my job next week in Mountain View. Do you think the strike will a) still be in effect and b) affect my commute?
a) Nope b) NopeI just moved to San Jose last week, and start my job next week in Mountain View. Do you think the strike will a) still be in effect and b) affect my commute?
Wouldn't going from San Jose to Mountain View involve taking Caltrain instead of BART?
You should be fine if that's the case.
Thanks!a) Nope b) Nope
I am not from the Bay Area at all, so I am unfamiliar with the different transit system nomenclature for different regions. I love the area so far though, but my wife and I went to Ikea in Palo Alto yesterday. Wanna talk about claustrophobia? There's people EVERYWHERE.
Thanks!
400,000 thousand
My friends had to drive across the bridge to get to work. Gonna be hell for them driving home.
No offense-but you're part of the problem.
(So I am I-moved here 10 years ago) But the Bay Area is severly overcrowded. There's no more room for anyone here-but more and more people want to move here and we just keep piling up.
Haha none taken - that's a dilemma my wife and I had. I got a great job offer at a hospital in the area (they contacted me), and offered to pay moving expenses, etc. I saw the weather during the summer time and asked where do I sign.
Now the rent on the other hand... holy shitballs... $2800/month for a decent/new/safe pad?
Most of the additional reporting is just detailing how bad the traffic is this morning.BART and its unions saw their four-year contract expire overnight after three months of failed negotiations and workers immediately began hitting the picket lines. A strike will continue indefinitely until BART management and the two unions representing 2,300 blue-collar workers reach a deal. On Monday morning, neither side had any immediate plans to return to the bargaining table as they remained at odds over wage increases and medical and pension benefits.
"We have not heard from the mediator yet, so unfortunately no talks are scheduled. We're hoping that changes soon," BART spokesman Rick Rice said Monday morning. "We do feel this is unfair to our riders and hope to get it resolved quickly."
Carpool lanes will remain open throughout the day and motorists should be prepared for heavy traffic and hot weather. The CHP advised filling up gas tanks and bringing along plenty of water in case of long waits in traffic. Most of the heavy traffic Monday morning was centered in the East Bay leading to the Bay
Bridge.
AC Transit has not announced a strike as of today-so Transbay buses ARE running-but they'll be caught in that same Bay Bridge traffic. I'm sure the buses themselves are also more packed than usual too so keep that in mind.
Here's a photo from first thing this morning:
If you include benefits, a lot of people are 5%ers. A $60,000 base salary shouldn't be considered insane. As far as overtime goes, either hire more people or pay people overtime, that's the choice.
That's more than my mortgage, dude-I live in Castro Valley and have a 4 bedroom 3 bath townhouse with a garage in a great neighborhood. Could just be where you setup shop. Bay Area prices are insane-absolutely insane, but again it's because there's such a demand to live here and not enough supply. What made you choose San Jose? My wife and I had to eventually give up on where we really wanted to live and buy a house where we could actually afford to live.
Sorry but thats what the bridge usually looks like in morning traffic lol.
Yeah, I know mortgages are a bit more affordable, but my wife wanted fancy. So we got the fancy condo near downtown with shops all within walking distance and 1600 sq ft for 2 bedrooms. Place is huge and nice with archways and stuff, but still... annoying.
Stuff like the commute still scares me though.
For the position I think $60k a year base salary is pretty incredible... its cash handling right?
Yeah, I know mortgages are a bit more affordable, but my wife wanted fancy. So we got the fancy condo near downtown with shops all within walking distance and 1600 sq ft for 2 bedrooms. Place is huge and nice with archways and stuff, but still... annoying.
Stuff like the commute still scares me though.