Azure Dream
Member
I thought the IMAX 3D, while "fake" looking, was really stunning at the same time. Strangely, that shot where it pans at the ceiling of Belle's bedroom did not seem to have the right focus.
Oh yeah, the movie goes blurry in a lot of shots that shouldn't be, so weirdI thought the IMAX 3D, while "fake" looking, was really stunning at the same time. Strangely, that shot where it pans at the ceiling of Belle's bedroom did not seem to have the right focus.
I.
AM.
IN.
SHOCK!!!
I just got back, and HOLY MOLY! I had high hopes for this, and the movie managed to surpass my very huge expectations! I thought literally everything worked and that they couldn't have done a better job adapting this. I honestly can't find one negative thing about it. I couldn't wipe the grin off my face the whole way through! I THOUGHT IT WAS PERFECT! Just....wow! Movie magic!
10/10
And yes, I actually think it's even better than the animated movie - which I also love. (who doesn't?!)
Is it a characteristic of film that most of the swooping camera shots (and there are a lot) made everything blurry?
Like when Belle is introduced to her room, we're supposed to see how beautiful it is, but it's a blur of blue and gold. I noticed a lot of bumpy camera tracking too.
This makes me happy to see Glad its not a minority.
I honestly can't find one negative thing about it.
I.
AM.
IN.
SHOCK!!!
I just got back, and HOLY MOLY! I had high hopes for this, and the movie managed to surpass my very huge expectations! I thought literally everything worked and that they couldn't have done a better job adapting this. I honestly can't find one negative thing about it. I couldn't wipe the grin off my face the whole way through! I THOUGHT IT WAS PERFECT! Just....wow! Movie magic!
10/10
And yes, I actually think it's even better than the animated movie - which I also love. (who doesn't?!)
Inoffensive and pointless film where the entire cast seemed to be thinking of their paychecks.
Beast looked kind of awful.
Emma Watson didn't have an ounce of liberty with her personality in this film.
Can't imagine someone without attachment to the original finding much here.
Bleh.
You were fine with Emma Watson's singing? I would have preferred an actor who can sing great right off the bat.
)) Glad you liked it too! Great GIF too lol
I also agree that her acting was very good, as usual. She's very talented in that regard. I've seen all the Harry Potter movies, and didn't have the problem your aunty did.I saw the movie with my family, and when I mentioned I thought Belle was fantastic, my Aunty agreed with me but also said that she couldn't get her Harry Potter character out of her head everytime Belle was on screen. I haven't seen any of the Harry Potter movies, so I'm thinking that might of helped me in regards to liking Emma Watson.
Valid point. I'm just saying that I don't think it's that hard to get someone who does both. But maybe it is.Could they have gotten someone with a better voice? Sure, but I'd place acting over singing ability here. They can touch up the singing, but you're kinda screwed if your acting sucks. Overall I found her voice to be very solid and pleasant, regardless of how much they touched it up.
This makes no sense to me. I thought the entire cast was - here's that word again - perfect. I thought the passion and love was bursting from quite literally everyone involved.
I.
AM.
IN.
SHOCK!!!
I just got back, and HOLY MOLY! I had high hopes for this, and the movie managed to surpass my very huge expectations! I thought literally everything worked and that they couldn't have done a better job adapting this. I honestly can't find one negative thing about it. I couldn't wipe the grin off my face the whole way through! I THOUGHT IT WAS PERFECT! Just....wow! Movie magic!
10/10
And yes, I actually think it's even better than the animated movie - which I also love. (who doesn't?!)
It didn't seem like the town was that far away from the castle. How do the townsfolk not notice that huge castle in the distance that is experiencing eternal winter? Is it under a magic spell like Hogwarts so that no one can see it from a distance?
I haven't felt this good about a movie probably since Guardians of the Galaxy. I so wanted to clap when the credits started LOL. I felt like I had just finished watching a live play.
By the way, the credits were awesome too! I loved how all the characters were shown. Total class act.
My mom clapped when I went with her lol. I clapped too, I don't curr.
And yes! The credits with the Celine song were very beautiful!
LOL, mine did too. Beauty and the Beast is her favourite Disney movie. She's been listening to the soundtrack nonstop since last night!
Haha aw Mine was just singing "bonjour! Bonjour!" on the way home. Not the rest of the song, just that part.
Haha aw Mine was just singing "bonjour! Bonjour!" on the way home. Not the rest of the song, just that part.
Better than kids going Mine Mine Mine all the time after Finding NemoWTF?! Mine did that too!
That's probably my only gripe, it felt a bit too safe and too close to the original. Can't say I didn't enjoy it a lot though.
I appreciate that Gastonkinda deserved his death now. The original was a bit narcissistic but he didn't deserve to die. The girl got severe case of Stockholm syndrome, the Beast was a threat.
In the bedroom I thought it was focusing on the guided ornaments in the room. I didn't notice it in other areas.I enjoyed it, thought the songs were good, Gaston was great. Emma as Belle was good and I liked the bit of expanded story.
Annoying nitpick: the first time in the bedroom of the castle and the library and like 2 other areas, the camera goes unfocused for like 10 seconds? Why?
This reminded me of when Square tries to revisit/remake Final Fantasy 7 with more realistic visuals and how almost none of the warmth and humor of the source material is able to make the transition. Belle and Beast were utterly flat. Production was also, inexplicably, low-rent.
Totally agreed with you on most points. What I didn't like about Watson's belle was the poor singing ability, and with the beast it was the sketchy cgi. I thought her acting performance was great and their relationship was better-developed.Eh? I thought the humour was totally on point. Everyone in the cinema erupted into laughter when Belle got hit with a snowball. Same when Mrs. Potts yelled out "GRANDMA?!?" to LeFou. The movie felt very 'warm'. I could feel the love and passion the entire way through.
Belle and Beast were flat? They had much better chemistry this time. I always thought in the original that the romance wasn't believable as it was far too rushed (which is somewhat understandable since it's an animation aimed at kids).
Belle and Beast in the live action movie I thought had amazing chemistry. It felt both realistic and natural. The few added scenes gave just enough depth to make it feel believable.
And the production was low-rent? LOL. I don't even need to defend that comment. That's just crazy talk.
Totally agreed with you on most points. What I didn't like about Watson's belle was the poor singing ability, and with the beast it was the sketchy cgi. I thought her acting performance was great and their relationship was better-developed.
Yeah those critiques don't square with the movie at all.Eh? I thought the humour was totally on point. Everyone in the cinema erupted into laughter when Belle got hit with a snowball. Same when Mrs. Potts yelled out "GRANDMA?!?" to LeFou. The movie felt very 'warm'. I could feel the love and passion the entire way through.
Belle and Beast were flat? They had much better chemistry this time. I always thought in the original that the romance wasn't believable as it was far too rushed (which is somewhat understandable since it's an animation aimed at kids).
Belle and Beast in the live action movie I thought had amazing chemistry. It felt both realistic and natural. The few added scenes gave just enough depth to make it feel believable.
And the production was low-rent? LOL. I don't even need to defend that comment. That's just crazy talk.
For me it's mainly the auto tuning, which I typically don't notice much.Fair enough, on both points.
I must say though, the more I listen to the soundtrack on YouTube, the more I'm liking Emma Watson's voice.
Yeah I can see that. It felt like they bonded in that way over both being outcasts / social rejects, but not in a romantic way. Maybe that's a problem of the basic story...Something about their chemistry didn't do it for me. I like Belle and the Beast, but their chemistry felt more brother/sister or that of really close friends.
My god can Ewan do a good French accent. He was fantastic doing Be Our Guest.
Eh? I thought the humour was totally on point. Everyone in the cinema erupted into laughter when Belle got hit with a snowball. Same when Mrs. Potts yelled out "GRANDMA?!?" to LeFou. The movie felt very 'warm'. I could feel the love and passion the entire way through.
Belle and Beast were flat? They had much better chemistry this time. I always thought in the original that the romance wasn't believable as it was far too rushed (which is somewhat understandable since it's an animation aimed at kids).
Belle and Beast in the live action movie I thought had amazing chemistry. It felt both realistic and natural. The few added scenes gave just enough depth to make it feel believable.
And the production was low-rent? LOL. I don't even need to defend that comment. That's just crazy talk.
I thought the dance lacked grandeur compared to the original, but then I went back and watched the original again and realized it was more a product of seeing something that hadn't been done before in animation at the time. Watching it now it's a good scene but it doesn't evoke nearly as much of a sense of grandeur for me and sometimes feels a bit flat / dated.I have the same kind of not-worth-entertaining attitude toward your chemistry comments as you do toward my low-rent comments lol. Just look at how they bicker in the original compared to how they do here. They need some personality before they can graduate and move on to something as advanced as chemistry.
Watson has a sort of listless, lifeless quality as Belle, that makes it seem like she's sleepwalking through every scene she's in (though that may just be how Watson acts). Beast just lacked any passion in anything. Humor, affection, rage - it all just felt limp compared to the original (though that may be how bad CG acts?).
You can LOL about my comments about the production values, but I'm hardly the first to comment on how the scenery resembles a stage play, Beast's poor CG, or the lack of grandeur in the signature Belle/Beast dance scene. I thought Belle's iconic dress looked less glamourous and more home made, as well (though I'm guessing you'll say this made it more real).
Also the Belle getting hit in head with snowball reminded me of Dumb and Dumber or some subversive Shrek style gag.
Yup - and it'll benefit from almost assuredly not going with a lead primarily because of the box office draw (which I think played an undue influence in casting emma Watson, given the relative lack of singing ability), and that the genie doesn't need to be reallistically convincing the way the beast needed (and often failed) to be.The Imax 3D image quality was pretty bad it looked like some off screen cam footage at times.
I did enjoy the movie and it gives me high hopes a live action Aladdin can be done justice.