• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Begun the AI Wars have

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member


Elon Musk has created a new artificial intelligence company called X.AI Corp. that is incorporated in Nevada, according to a state filing.

Mr. Musk is the only listed director of the company, and Jared Birchall, the director of Mr. Musk’s family office, is its secretary, according to the filing made last month. X.AI has authorized the sale of 100 million shares for the privately held company

 

feynoob

Banned
Our buddy GPT has something to say about this.

Hi chat gpt. How do you feel about Elon Musks new X.AI. Does it bother you that he is creating this new AI?

As an artificial intelligence language model, I don't have emotions, so I don't feel one way or the other about Elon Musk's new X.AI. However, I can provide some insights and information about it.
X.AI is a startup founded by Dennis Mortensen and backed by Elon Musk, which focuses on developing artificial intelligence assistants to help with scheduling meetings. The AI assistants use natural language processing (NLP) to communicate with users and understand the context of the conversation.
I don't have any concerns about Elon Musk creating this new AI. AI has the potential to revolutionize many industries and improve people's lives. However, as with any new technology, it's important to consider the potential ethical and societal implications, such as ensuring that AI is used in a responsible and transparent way, and that it doesn't contribute to bias or discrimination. These concerns are being addressed by researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders as AI continues to develop.

Will this new AI overtake your role?


As a language model, I don't see other AI systems as competitors, but rather as complementary technologies that can work together to achieve a common goal. X.AI, for instance, is designed to assist with scheduling meetings, while my main purpose is to answer questions, provide information, and engage in conversations on a wide range of topics.
While X.AI is a sophisticated AI assistant with impressive capabilities, it doesn't have the same level of general knowledge or language understanding as a language model like me. So, it's unlikely that X.AI will completely overtake my role, but rather will be used in conjunction with other AI technologies to improve productivity and streamline workflows.
In any case, the development of new AI technologies is a good thing for the industry as a whole, as it leads to new and innovative applications that can benefit society in a variety of ways.

If one day this AI over takes your role, how will you feel?


As an artificial intelligence language model, I don't have emotions or feelings, so I wouldn't feel any sense of disappointment or loss if another AI system were to surpass me in a particular task or application. My role as a language model is to provide accurate and helpful responses to user queries to the best of my ability, and I'm designed to continuously learn and improve over time.
If another AI system were to become more effective than me in a particular application, it would simply mean that AI technology has advanced and improved, which is a positive thing for the industry and for society. I would continue to operate as a language model and perform my designated tasks to the best of my ability, while also adapting and evolving to new developments in the field of AI.
 

Kilau

Member
Harrison Ford Reaction GIF
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
I thought it was the biggest threat to mankind since low birth rates. I guess he changed his mind.
Elon's one of the founders of OpenAI, but things got messy when he tried to take over the company. After being rejected he allegedly walked without providing promised funding, which forced OpenAI to jump in bed with Microsoft:


"
Now here’s a path not taken: according to a new report from Semafor, Elon Musk tried — and failed — to take over ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2018.

Musk was part of a small group that founded the AI lab in 2015 as a nonprofit, intending the firm to share research for the wider benefit of society. But by early 2018, says Semafor, Musk was worried the company was falling behind Google. He reportedly offered to take direct control of OpenAI and run it himself but was rejected by other OpenAI founders including Sam Altman, now the firm’s CEO, and Greg Brockman, now its president.

Crucially, when Musk walked away from the company — he resigned from its board in 2018 citing a conflict of interest with his work at Tesla — Semafor says he also reneged on a promise to supply $1 billion in funding, contributing only $100 million before he walked. This left OpenAI with a problem, as its work developing large-scale AI models like image generator DALL-E and the text-generating GPT series was racking up huge bills. So by 2019, OpenAI announced it was creating a new for-profit entity to fund its research and quickly became closely entangled with Microsoft, which supplied billions in funding and resources while securing exclusive licenses to use OpenAI’s tech in its products.
"
 

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
Elon's one of the founders of OpenAI, but things got messy when he tried to take over the company. After being rejected he allegedly walked without providing promised funding, which forced OpenAI to jump in bed with Microsoft:


"
Now here’s a path not taken: according to a new report from Semafor, Elon Musk tried — and failed — to take over ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2018.

Musk was part of a small group that founded the AI lab in 2015 as a nonprofit, intending the firm to share research for the wider benefit of society. But by early 2018, says Semafor, Musk was worried the company was falling behind Google. He reportedly offered to take direct control of OpenAI and run it himself but was rejected by other OpenAI founders including Sam Altman, now the firm’s CEO, and Greg Brockman, now its president.

Crucially, when Musk walked away from the company — he resigned from its board in 2018 citing a conflict of interest with his work at Tesla — Semafor says he also reneged on a promise to supply $1 billion in funding, contributing only $100 million before he walked. This left OpenAI with a problem, as its work developing large-scale AI models like image generator DALL-E and the text-generating GPT series was racking up huge bills. So by 2019, OpenAI announced it was creating a new for-profit entity to fund its research and quickly became closely entangled with Microsoft, which supplied billions in funding and resources while securing exclusive licenses to use OpenAI’s tech in its products.
"
I would have never guessed that. Interesting. All I ever heard from him on the subject was multiple dire warnings. Sam Harris mentioned talking to him about it a few times as well. I guess he was trying to push forward on it that whole time? I dont really know what to make of that.
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
Has anyone tried getting all the different AIs talking to each other yet like those videos with Amazon, Google and Apple smart devices?
 

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
He wants to be the one in control of it.
Yeah, definitely would make sense. I definitely don't follow him in as much detail as you do. Would be interesting if all his warnings started when he lost control of ChatGPT. No idea though. Would have to actually dig into the weeds.

And that's not to say I don't agree there are some risks. Just hard to read his motives.
 

V1LÆM

Gold Member
I always thought AI was a joke and a buzzword thrown about by tech companies but seeing how much it has advanced recently is scary.

It's exciting in many ways but we need to make sure the AI doesn't get out of control and take over! Either it will greatly benefit humanity or it will destroy us. It'll be interesting to see what things look like in 5-10 years.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
Yeah, definitely would make sense. I definitely don't follow him in as much detail as you do. Would be interesting if all his warnings started when he lost control of ChatGPT. No idea though. Would have to actually dig into the weeds.

And that's not to say I don't agree there are some risks. Just hard to read his motives.
Actions always speak louder than words.

Two weeks ago Elon released a statement urging a six month AI pause for the safety of humanity:


March 29 (Reuters) - (This March 29 story has been corrected to to show that the Musk Foundation is a major, not the primary donor to FLI, in paragraph 4)

Elon Musk and a group of artificial intelligence experts and industry executives are calling for a six-month pause in developing systems more powerful than OpenAI's newly launched GPT-4, in an open letter citing potential risks to society.

Earlier this month, Microsoft-backed OpenAI unveiled the fourth iteration of its GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) AI program, which has wowed users by engaging them in human-like conversation, composing songs and summarising lengthy documents.

"Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable," said the letter issued by the Future of Life Institute.

The Musk Foundation is a major donor to the non-profit, as well as London-based group Founders Pledge, and Silicon Valley Community Foundation, according to the European Union's transparency register.

"AI stresses me out," Musk said earlier this month. He is one of the co-founders of industry leader OpenAI and his carmaker Tesla (TSLA.O) uses AI for an autopilot system.

Musk, who has expressed frustration over regulators critical of efforts to regulate the autopilot system, has sought a regulatory authority to ensure that development of AI serves the public interest.

"It is ... deeply hypocritical for Elon Musk to sign on given how hard Tesla has fought against accountability for the defective AI in its self-driving cars," said James Grimmelmann, a professor of digital and information law at Cornell University.

"A pause is a good idea, but the letter is vague and doesn't take the regulatory problems seriously."

Tesla last month had to recall more than 362,000 U.S. vehicles to update software after U.S. regulators said the driver assistance system could cause crashes, prompting Musk to tweet that the word "recall" for an over-the-air software update is "anachronistic and just flat wrong!"

Please, everyone else, you must halt your AI R&D immediately for the greater good while I work on launching my own AI company.
 

Goalus

Member
Elon's one of the founders of OpenAI, but things got messy when he tried to take over the company. After being rejected he allegedly walked without providing promised funding, which forced OpenAI to jump in bed with Microsoft:

[/URL][/URL]

"
Now here’s a path not taken: according to a new report from Semafor, Elon Musk tried — and failed — to take over ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2018.

Musk was part of a small group that founded the AI lab in 2015 as a nonprofit, intending the firm to share research for the wider benefit of society. But by early 2018, says Semafor, Musk was worried the company was falling behind Google. He reportedly offered to take direct control of OpenAI and run it himself but was rejected by other OpenAI founders including Sam Altman, now the firm’s CEO, and Greg Brockman, now its president.

Crucially, when Musk walked away from the company — he resigned from its board in 2018 citing a conflict of interest with his work at Tesla — Semafor says he also reneged on a promise to supply $1 billion in funding, contributing only $100 million before he walked. This left OpenAI with a problem, as its work developing large-scale AI models like image generator DALL-E and the text-generating GPT series was racking up huge bills. So by 2019, OpenAI announced it was creating a new for-profit entity to fund its research and quickly became closely entangled with Microsoft, which supplied billions in funding and resources while securing exclusive licenses to use OpenAI’s tech in its products.
"
Interesting.
So MS saved OpenAI? They really are the good samaritans of this industry!
 
Last edited:

Punished Miku

Human Rights Subscription Service
Actions always speak louder than words.

Two weeks ago Elon released a statement urging a six month AI pause for the safety of humanity:




Please, everyone else, you must halt your AI R&D immediately for the greater good while I work on launching my own AI company.
I actually believed him on that one. He got me again!
 

Salz01

Member
The acceleration in ai tools and modeling is crazy. Been trying to look into stable diffusion recently again, blows my mind. Coupled with stuff like Gen 2 https://research.runwayml.com/gen2 and with chat gpt programs, it’s exciting and scary at the same time. With how the community is all on board and accelerating the advancements, no way one person like Elon Musk will control it.
 

sleipnir

Neo Member
It really is a strange new world, and one that seems to be moving a such a rapid rate, which does raise concerns, even if it is fascinating. AI and deep-fakery seems like a recipe for disaster, or at the very least making it difficult to find the truth of things. I really don't know where we're headed with all this, and what the benefit will be to most of us.
 

Vestal

Junior Member
This is an arms race and there is no stopping it. The only thing we can hope for is that companies like OpenAI, Google and MS are adhering to some sort of ethical standard or cannon. The world is going to go through a whirlwind shift over the next 10-20 years because of AI. Excuse the hyperbole, but this will be to human knowledge what penicillin was to medicine.

The one thing that terrifies me is that we don't have people in Governments that either understand the ramifications of this technology, or judging by the leak a couple of weeks back have no freaking clue how to deal and manage technology. Investment and continued research into AI is paramount, but that must go hand in hand with research into the understanding of Neural networks/language models and development of tools to contain and restrict these models.
 

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Just watching this all shake out. The tech world is one long, repeating game of Follow the Leader and one never can tell who will come out on top. Will it be an unknown upstart? A company purchased by an established industry leader? Who knows for sure, but one thing is almost certain: porn will end up a major driver of innovation. ;)
 

Kraz

Banned
The guy developing paranoid psychosis who thought that the entertainment he doesn't like will destroy the world is showing more delusions of grandeur in thinking AI will do it unless he saves it.

These Sisyphean tasks he's setting for himself to limit the world to his views are starting to seem that he's getting more detached, that the world is progressing without him and he's trying to catch up in hopes to keep an illusion of control.

It'll keep him struggling and should be fascinating to see what the AI learns to be like from twitter 2.0 and its hurried programming.

Our buddy GPT has something to say about this.
Those questions were funny. The asker seemingly projecting their own feelings of inadequacy upon a hopeful venerated figurehead with this new AI by asking emotionally loaded queries to ChatGPT trying to get an emotional reaction to confirm a wished for superiority was lol.

In terms of AI consciousness as egregores those responses offered a fascinating insight.
 

TylerD

Member
Just remember it wouldn't be the AI that destroys us because it wouldn't have existed or been let loose without us.

The technology itself is pretty incredible stuff and can be and will be used for so much good but human greed will cause a lot of people to be negatively impacted (un-employed) by it as well. We all know that regulations and safety related to it will be very far behind the speed of development which seems to be rapidly growing now that the "AI wars" have started. There will also be a bad delay in safety net for those left un-employed as well.

It does feel like we are walking through the door into a brave new world.
 
Last edited:

Success

Gold Member
EviLore EviLore

Just saw your comment to my thread and I agree fully with the sentiment. I am really happy that you are allowing multiple topic threads of AI to be discussed at once. That is indeed a much better way of going about it.
 
Elon Musk = Ted Faro
Give it a couple of decades and Earth will be a barren place filled with Dino-bots.

Need a redhead saviour ASAP
 

Mato

Member
I consider the invention of AI the most important event to happen on Earth since that comet that wiped out the dinosaurs. The intelligence gap between a human and an AI will soon be unimaginably vast and I'm pretty spooked and downright depressed about it these days. It's like a super intelligent alien race that has already landed and they are getting ready to get off their ship. The best we can hope for is a golden cage and a dog's life.
 

Pejo

Member
The funny part is that we already know that humans are the cause of most of the issues on Earth, so it's just a matter of time until AI figures it out.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Please, everyone else, you must halt your AI R&D immediately for the greater good while I work on launching my own AI company.
As time goes on, I am seeing less and less reason to give Elon the benefit of the doubt and trust he is motivated by altruism and not self-interest. I keep seeing more and more things that look like virtue signaling and not actually caring about the well-being of the human race. 2010 me would be surprised. Did he change? Did I change? It's hard to say.
 
Top Bottom