Bernie Sanders = Ron Paul

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because our voting system is fucked up and demands people support the lesser of two evils.

If we were actually to give something like runoff voting a chance, we might see people start to vote for candidates that actually best represent their personal views without fearing their vote being thrown away.

It's the primaries. Support whoever you want.
 
Ron Paul attracted center and right of center people who thought they were moderate or conservative but they were really libertarian

Bernie sanders is attracting center and left of center people who thought they are moderate or progressive but they are really socialist leaning without being socialists
 
Once a Socialist candidate demonstrates policy ideas on the national stage, I think some of the stigma surrounding the word will subside. Most people will agree with his positions, but are biased due to the decades old propaganda that has slandered Socialism and Socialist policies. His candidacy may open the way for legitimate Socialist candidates in the future and pave the way for a better future for all Americans.
 
Ron Paul attracted center and right of center people who thought they were moderate or conservative but they were really libertarian

Bernie sanders is attracting center and left of center people who thought they are moderate or progressive but they are really socialist leaning without being socialists

Yeah, in that way, they're equal. But equating someone who is 10 times for equal rights, and supporting someone who is 10 times against equal rights, still can't be viewed as equal in my mind....

I don't know if that's a character flaw of mine or not.
 
Ron Paul attracted center and right of center people who thought they were moderate or conservative but they were really libertarian

Bernie sanders is attracting center and left of center people who thought they are moderate or progressive but they are really socialist leaning without being socialists

Bernie Sanders is not a socialist. I wish people realize that.
 
I think the comparison stands on a superficial level. They're both old, underdogs, and have uncompromising political views that resonate with younger people, hence their presence on the Internet.

And I wouldn't say 'equal' but 'analogous.'
 
Bernie Sanders is not a socialist. I wish people realize that.
He literally describes himself as a democratic socialist. And I mean good? Sanders is the only candidate who is genuinely left leaning. Hilldawg will be a right of center Dem, just like Obama. Our political discourse has been terribly tilted to the right. It's gross.
 
What do you mean by "infest"?
The Paul people took over positions in the state and local parties by exploiting the system (aka following the party bylaws), and then the party establishment had to fight to clean a lot of them and their candidates out over the last four years. This is one reason Mitch McConnell had to hire up Paul people for his re-election. Rand had sucked a lot of people into positions of value within the Kentucky GOP.
 
I don't even know how to respond to this thread. Fucking what? Hillary has ONE nearly legitimate competitor and anybody who supports him is "annoying"? Are you that afraid of her losing the nomination?

Seriously. I don't think Bernie will win the primary, but why not vote for him if he supports my views?
 
I never liked Ron Paul. But I'm fully behind Bernie. Went Obama both elections. I think Bernie stands a stronger chance than Paul did, too.

Please don't make it sound like Paul supporters back then are all Bernie supporters know. They have key differences in their ideology.

I think this country needs a lot more socialism and people need to stop being so scared of the word. We are already very socialist in a lot of ways. Let's embrace it.
 
You can win the general election with 47% support.

Not to mention that once Sanders gets his message out there, some of those "no" people might find that they agree with him on a lot of issues.

Realistically a candidate giving up 40% of their own party's votes, giving up 50% of the independent votes and 75% of republican votes before saying a word is a candidate doomed to fail.

hhzazbdkm0qzbme-wyh9la.png

Socialist is one of the most hated traits of a politician. Even if he convinced half the people that are currently saying no to consider a vote for him he would still be significantly down compared to any non-socialist candidate.

Currently in the U.S he's able to to push the narrative left during the primaries which would be very nice, similar to the tea party moved which moved it to the right, but he is unelectable right now.
 
Yep. Young people get enamored by ideologues because they still live in a sheltered black and white world. You grow up and realize it is all bullshit and some ideology doesn't solve problems. I got old Ron Paul stickers I would like to burn to prove it.


That sounds like an ideology to me.
 
OP, your attempts to be a "tells it like it is" cynical realist are more annoying than anything I've seen from any Bernie supporter. People like him because he's intelligent, principled, a good man, has a shit-ton of experience in government, and is the only truly left candidate out there. Most recognize he can't win, but as long as he's out there, he's an asset to progressivism. Who gives a damn if a few kids convince themselves wrongly that he had a shit? They're kids.
 
Realistically a candidate giving up 40% of their own party's votes, giving up 50% of the independent votes and 75% of republican votes before saying a word is a candidate doomed to fail.



Socialist is one of the most hated traits of a politician. Even if he convinced half the people that are currently saying no to consider a vote for him he would still be significantly down compared to any non-socialist candidate.

Currently in the U.S he's able to to push the narrative left during the primaries which would be very nice, similar to the tea party moved which moved it to the right, but he is unelectable right now.

Again, you don't see democrat or republican on that survey, do you?

Why is this still touted around?
 
He literally describes himself as a democratic socialist. And I mean good? Sanders is the only candidate who is genuinely left leaning. Hilldawg will be a right of center Dem, just like Obama. Our political discourse has been terribly tilted to the right. It's gross.

I don't care what he calls himself. He is not a socialist. He might be a social Democrat at best but he is not a socialist.
 
Its not really other people saying that, he describes himself as a socialist.

He calls himself a democratic socialist. He's not an actual socialist.

While that distinction might not matter to most republicans, I think it probably would matter to some of those 40% of Democrats who said no. Same goes for some independents (at least the ones who are on the left rather than just being libertarian nutters).
 
Only thing that I liked about Ron Paul was his foreign policy. I like more about Bernie Sanders than just his foreign policy (I guess my Canadian-ness is showing).
 
It's the primaries. Support whoever you want.

I just registered as a Democrat so I could do so, but what I said still stands if, say, Sanders were to run as a third party candidate and you wanted to support him without fear of robbing the Center Left Dem candidate a vote.
 
Realistically a candidate giving up 40% of their own party's votes, giving up 50% the independent votes and 75% of republican votes before saying a word is a candidate doomed to fail.



Socialist is one of the most hated traits of a politician. Even if he convinced half the people that are currently saying no to consider a vote for him he would still be significantly down compared to any non-socialist candidate.

Currently in the U.S he's able to to push the narrative left during the primaries which would be very nice, similar to the tea party moved which moved it to the right, but he is unelectable right now.

Here's another part of the Gallup poll:
I wonder how much of the 18-29 age demographic are actually going to vote this year?
 
I have and in no way did he want to isolate the US. He wanted to go do business with everyone. That makes him libertarian but not isolationist.

Isolationism would be something akin to North Korea. Unfortunately people think you have to fight wars to avoid being isolationist.

I figure Switzerland is closer to what Ron Paul has in mind.

That's not what isolationism means in the contest of US politics and history. It has nothing to do with shutting yourself off from the rest of the world and refusing to trade with people. It's about not getting into permanent (if any) political alliances and avoiding foreign wars. It's not an economic policy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_non-interventionism
 
The only reason Ron Paul was unelectable is because of how corrupt the media was and still is and also because of how rigged things are in general. If it was fair chances are he would of at the very least won the republican nomination. They never did let him get his one on one debates in because they knew nobody stood a chance.
 
Anyone who thinks Hilary has the nomination "in the bag" has a short memory. She had 2008 in the bag too, until she didn't.

Obama ran the greatest campaign of all time and Hillary's lead wasn't anywhere near as large in 08 as it is this time.

I love Bern but he really doesn't have a chance.
 
One candidate is a central planner and the other is pro-total free markets+anti-cronyism. The only similarities are probably somewhat on foreign policy and the demographics of their supporters. (I don't know Bernie's civil liberties' positions, may be similar there)
 
Anyone who thinks Hilary has the nomination "in the bag" has a short memory. She had 2008 in the bag too, until she didn't.

Except she does. Bernie isn't nearly as strong of a candidate as his fans would lead you to believe.

You know a candidate has no chance to win when the primary justification for their potential victory is young people actually showing to vote this time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom