• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Besty Devos splits Senate with 50/50 vote, VP Pence confirms nomation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ferrio

Banned
So I work at a low income school that was given all this technology to teach poor kids how to code. I get to make the curriculum but with this woman in charge I do not know what the future direction will be. I have been in a daze worried if this is going to get defunded exactly how bad is this woman?

You couldn't get worse.

Expect to see a lot of money siphoned off of public education and into the private sector.
 
I hope that most of the Republicans who voted for her are prepared to lose their seats in the 2018 midterm election.

Kind of late to the party. 2018 will end up being much like 2016. People are just not outraged enough and way too many senate seats are in red states which the orange turd carried.

Really? You should read the numerous Facebook comments in which a lot of people are outraged about it.

Link.

I have so many Trump voters on FB right now upset that she got cast in. I am about to go nuclear on them, despite it likely ending friendships.

They brought it on themselves by voting for him in the first place. Idiots.
 

GhaleonQ

Member
So the solution to fixing public education is taking kids out of it and letting the rest burn and fail?

I think the correct goal of education is to ensure that children are educated well and equipped to make good life decisions, not to ensure the thriving of school district-style public education.

Districts have an important role to play! Earnestly, I do not want to see them die. However, I think that a lot of great change comes from allowing leaders to sprout up wherever they may be, give them the resources to scale, and then watch those who are less good emulate and do well themselves while letting the bad ones disappear.

So, good schools (district, charter, voucher, all of which are "public education") ought to be given a ton of resources.

Public school districts are able to change the rules if they wanted to do so! But they don't/aren't able because of political reasons. Perhaps exposing them to the incentives to change will help that happen.

You strike me as someone arguing to strip Google of money to give to Yahoo, because Yahoo did some good stuff 1st.

That said, governors, state legislatures, superintendents, and school boards have the power to make that happen, not the Education Secretary. I hope everyone complaining votes!
 

btrboyev

Member
I hope that most of the Republicans who voted for her are prepared to lose their seats in the 2018 midterm election.



Really? You should read the numerous Facebook comments in which a lot of people are outraged about it.

Link.



They brought it on themselves by voting for him in the first place. Idiots.

There are only 8 Republican senate seats up in 2018. Over 20 democrat seats are also up. Who do you think is going to lose that fight?

We are screwed
 

Lautaro

Member
This crap makes me think there won't be impeachment. You can't stop Devos so how the hell are you going to get 2 thirds of the Senate to vote for an impeachment?

Tough 4 years for America.
 

liquidtmd

Banned
This crap makes me think there won't be impeachment. You can't stop Devos so how the hell are you going to get 2 thirds of the Senate to vote for an impeachment?

True...But whilst it feels like years, we are still only three weeks in to his reign.

Give it three months with the actual affects of his moronic decisions truly kicking in - then we will see.
 
I have never had faith in Congress to help us. Ultimately the people have to fight this. We have the media as allies in seeking truth, for now. The judicial system is a tool that can be used to fight, for now.
 

Magwik

Banned
I think the correct goal of education is to ensure that children are educated well and equipped to make good life decisions, not to ensure the thriving of school district-style public education.

Districts have an important role to play! Earnestly, I do not want to see them die. However, I think that a lot of great change comes from allowing leaders to sprout up wherever they may be, give them the resources to scale, and then watch those who are less good emulate and do well themselves while letting the bad ones disappear.

So, good schools (district, charter, voucher, all of which are "public education") ought to be given a ton of resources.

Public school districts are able to change the rules if they wanted to do so! But they don't/aren't able because of political reasons. Perhaps exposing them to the incentives to change will help that happen.

You strike me as someone arguing to strip Google of money to give to Yahoo, because Yahoo did some good stuff 1st.

That said, governors, state legislatures, superintendents, and school boards have the power to make that happen, not the Education Secretary. I hope everyone complaining votes!
So what about the DoE removing common core and fucking over special needs kids across the board? What about allowing more and more guns inside the schools or even mandating them? What about the dozens of possible conflicts of interests DeVos serves? What about the teachers in public education of both sides being absolutely appalled and in arms over the her and he policies?

Look, I see where you're coming from, you genuinely just want more kids to have more chances and opportunities. However as charter schools are currently presented, they don't offer these sort of opportunities. Only a minority have students who are more proficient than the neighboring public schools, while the majority perform on the same level or worse. So charter schools are not the solution.

If we want children to have a choice of school and education we at least should ensure that all public schools are funded and are performing at a certain standard. Something to remember is that schools get funding based on the amount of students attending. Say over time the school loses 1/4 of its students to charter schools, they are then losing tens of thousands of dollars in resources.

Or take into consideration choice for kids to thrive. That should be within the curriculum and have any assortment of options available that are up to school and community that is government funded. For example, my old high school and middle school had taken severe budget cuts and lost a lot of programs that would help the students thrive. Woodshop, auto class, NJROTC, and a machinery class. NJROTC, the school couldn't afford any instructors, so the class gets axed. I spent 3 out of my 4 years in the class and was the last class to have it. In those 3 years I saw many many people change and become much better, stronger individuals simply due to the inherit nature of the course and the community it pushed and fostered. A family friend is the COO of a local factory plant and the only reason the school district still has a shop/auto class and such is because he and the company works with the district to provide the tools and such to them.

This is all coming from someone who attended an above average school for the greater Detroit area. I know how bad things are and were in the schools around me. I care very deeply about the issue, and the solution is absolutely not to build more charter schools or even more schools.
 

Pyrokai

Member
Just one depressing thing after another.


Question, though.......I mean I've read the worst case scenario and plausible scenarios and both are depressing as hell, but can damage be undone if--by chance--we elect a good executive branch in 2020? I'm so scared......

I'm really fucking depressed. Someone give me a silver lining here, lol.
 

hobozero

Member
Y'all should stop calling them "Charter Schools" and start calling them "For-Profit Elementary Schools". Start drawing the comparison to shitty for-profit colleges.
 

Neoweee

Member
I have so many Trump voters on FB right now upset that she got cast in. I am about to go nuclear on them, despite it likely ending friendships.

Trump voters and Bernie or Busters getting upset at Trump's BS is the only light in the darkness.

Oh, if only there were something they could have done!
 

Kill3r7

Member
I hope that most of the Republicans who voted for her are prepared to lose their seats in the 2018 midterm election.



Really? You should read the numerous Facebook comments in which a lot of people are outraged about it.

Link.

How many of these people are actually undecided voters from congressional districts that are up for re-election in 2018? That was my point.

Y'all should stop calling them "Charter Schools" and start calling them "For-Profit Elementary Schools". Start drawing the comparison to shitty for-profit colleges.

Ditto. Also, they should be held to higher standards than regular public schools due to better funding.
 

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
Starts with other things outside of school. Get it so families aren't cash strapped, aren't locked into low paying jobs, and don't have to worry about health insurance.

Make it so both parents don't have to work 80 hours a week to support their family. Give adults more free time so they can engage and interact with their kids and have that feed into their education.

Make it so rich parents who end up with more time and resources aren't automatically at an advantage over the rest.

This idea of charter schools is fucking tons of privatization bullshit, and the idea of just shuffling kids around to different schools doesn't actually fix anything.
 
There are only 8 Republican senate seats up in 2018. Over 20 democrat seats are also up. Who do you think is going to lose that fight?

We are screwed

I know that it's an uphill battle for the Democrats, but the Republicans have much more to lose than they do by constantly making insane decisions like this.

They just keep giving the Democrats more ammo to use against them, as well as with Trump's own crazy tweets.
 

Fox Mulder

Member
Just one depressing thing after another.


Question, though.......I mean I've read the worst case scenario and plausible scenarios and both are depressing as hell, but can damage be undone if--by chance--we elect a good executive branch in 2020? I'm so scared......

I'm really fucking depressed. Someone give me a silver lining here, lol.

2018 isn't going to offer a giant wave for Dems to ride on. Even if Trump is gone in 2020, we still have the fucking republicans controlling congress. They either go full obstructionist or fuck you we'll do whatever we want with a smile on their face. The 2020 census is coming up and redistricting was going to be important for the dems if Hillary won. We'll eat shit instead.
 

Socivol

Member
The more I think about this the more I think it's pretty normal. There are so many people running educational institutions with no formal education experience. It's one of the main reasons that I left the classroom and I am now in a position where I help schools but don't work at one. I am really trying to get out of the education space all together because it's very common for people with no real classroom or administrative experience to run K-12 education in this country.
 
The more I think about this the more I think it's pretty normal. There are so many people running educational institutions with no formal education experience. It's one of the main reasons that I left the classroom and I am now in a position where I help schools but don't work at one. I am really trying to get out of the education space all together because it's very common for people with no real classroom or administrative experience to run K-12 education in this country.

This is depressing.
 

GhaleonQ

Member
Y'all should stop calling them "Charter Schools" and start calling them "For-Profit Elementary Schools". Start drawing the comparison to shitty for-profit colleges.

I mean, most aren't. Most are non-profits, as are all religious voucher schools and many other secular ones. That would just be false information.

Ditto. Also, they should be held to higher standards than regular public schools due to better funding.

As mentioned elsewhere, because approving them often requires cutting deals, they are often funded worse, even if you add fundraising dollars on top of that.

This idea of charter schools is fucking tons of privatization bullshit, and the idea of just shuffling kids around to different schools doesn't actually fix anything.

Mmm, that would sound silly if you applied it to anything else. "Shuffling kids around to different colleges doesn't actually fix anything." "Shuffling kids around to the more responsible parent in a divorce doesn't actually fix anything." "Shuffling adults around to a different corporation for jobs doesn't actually fix anything."

Of course it can!

So what about the DoE removing common core and fucking over special needs kids across the board? What about allowing more and more guns inside the schools or even mandating them? What about the dozens of possible conflicts of interests DeVos serves? What about the teachers in public education of both sides being absolutely appalled and in arms over the her and he policies?

Look, I see where you're coming from, you genuinely just want more kids to have more chances and opportunities. However as charter schools are currently presented, they don't offer these sort of opportunities. Only a minority have students who are more proficient than the neighboring public schools, while the majority perform on the same level or worse. So charter schools are not the solution.

If we want children to have a choice of school and education we at least should ensure that all public schools are funded and are performing at a certain standard. Something to remember is that schools get funding based on the amount of students attending. Say over time the school loses 1/4 of its students to charter schools, they are then losing tens of thousands of dollars in resources.

Or take into consideration choice for kids to thrive. That should be within the curriculum and have any assortment of options available that are up to school and community that is government funded. For example, my old high school and middle school had taken severe budget cuts and lost a lot of programs that would help the students thrive. Woodshop, auto class, NJROTC, and a machinery class. NJROTC, the school couldn't afford any instructors, so the class gets axed. I spent 3 out of my 4 years in the class and was the last class to have it. In those 3 years I saw many many people change and become much better, stronger individuals simply due to the inherit nature of the course and the community it pushed and fostered. A family friend is the COO of a local factory plant and the only reason the school district still has a shop/auto class and such is because he and the company works with the district to provide the tools and such to them.

This is all coming from someone who attended an above average school for the greater Detroit area. I know how bad things are and were in the schools around me. I care very deeply about the issue, and the solution is absolutely not to build more charter schools or even more schools.

Hey, before anything else, I just wanted to say thank you for the actual discussion. So much of NeoGAF irritates me, but I never want to become 1 of those people who dismisses an entire group. Thank you for challenging my assumptions!

1. The Department Of Education cannot "remove" Common Core. It was a governor-level idea. States adopt them. Schools have already invested in buying the materials. Whatever happens, it won't be because of DeVos' pulpit. And, as I wrote, if you're mad about suburban parents hating Common Core, blame Duncan for assuming anyone who didn't want it was not worth hearing.

2. It won't fuck over special needs kids. We are already underfunding it because we are great at identifying special needs now but haven't made the requisite adjustments, for obvious budget reasons. We cut corners and hope for the best.

Why WOULD DeVos cut special needs funding? Test scores would plummet, Republicans and Democrats would revolt, sob stories would be everywhere. It doesn't even make sense. I can accept people ascribing insane behavior to Trump, but, like her or not (I think she is okay; I am mainly defending policies she likes), she is a rational actor.

3. Guns in schools is not a decision made nationally. If she spent more time in urban schools, she would be way more cautious, though. (I am from Wisconsin Rapids, a small, rural town, where that would be less scary and weird. Like, kids would call in sick for hunting season.)

4. As for conflicts of interest and district teachers being pissed, DeVos lost the chance to win them over or quiet them at her hearing. If I blame everyone except Alexander for being awful education secretaries, I have to blame her, too.

This is no reflection on her so much as it is an acknowledgment of the new political reality.


5. Charter schools? Not true. https://edexcellence.net/articles/credo-urban-charter-school-study-report-on-41-regions Unless we are referencing different studies, urban charter schools are serving a much more low-income population. Great studies show moderate gains for urban charters. If you are referring to Detroit, yeah, they did before at or above. Maybe this isn't sufficient for you to jump on board, but it is for me.

Anecdotally, I'm in Milwaukee. There are 100 schools that are more than 80 percent low-income, 80 percent African American. I'm at a voucher school, Lutheran, that is usually the number 1 school. We blew it last year and are...3rd, behind 2 schools in a charter school network. The top schools in reading, mathematics, science (ha ha ha), and social studies are mostly Lutheran schools. If you do the same for Hispanic Americans, they're mostly Catholic schools. There are bad schools in all sectors, but 1 out of 10 black kids in Milwaukee read at grade level, which is why 55 percent graduate high school. My school is 90 percent, despite being just as poor and black in the student population. We get 4,000 fewer dollars than public schools for each student. In other words, with 900 students, we're shorted $3,600,000, but we get far better results.

6. As for funding, don't blame DeVos. Blame suburban Democrats and Republicans. I posted DeVos saying the same thing above.

I hear you. http://maps.edbuild.org/DividingLines.html An old boss of mine runs that group. I believe in ESA, but you would probably hate that. However, it would create equity across districts and schools.

If you're complaining that district schools lose dollars for every student they lose, yeah, duh. But they also are not incurring the expenses of educating them, so it's a wash. In fact, since most choice schools get fewer dollars per child, it actually goes back to taxpayers. However, yes, they have to pay for those buildings whether children are in them or not. I acknowledge this is tough, consolidating or closing! Kids are more important than adults, however.

I also hear you on "non-core classes." All I can say is that these are the consequences of having horrible district schools for 50 years. Results? Flat or down. Future productivity? Down. Unfunded benefits? Up. So, now come the hard times. That is really why I am a conservative: take a little pain now to avoid great pain in the future. The answer is rarely more money, as we saw with Duncan. People will squander it. Get mad at school boards, governors, and state legislatures, not DeVos.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom