I skimmed a few pages of the ripped sackcloth and ashes, and I just want to ask:
You all know that the Education Secretary has very little power in 2017, right? Like, if you wanted a head on a pike, make DeVos it, sure, but when I read emotional posts like, "Now, our public school district system will be terrible!" (as if it wasn't already), I wonder.
Arne Duncan was the latest in a string of Education Secretaries who had big plans but terrible implementation and no interest in relationship building.
He ignored rural communities entirely.
He wasted billions of dollars on urban Race To The Top and School Improvement Grants, which had unrealistic expectations for implementation and no way to motivate or discipline. districts and states that had already gotten their money. Obama's office concluded that there was no effect.
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174013/pdf/20174013.pdf This also makes it impossible for any secretary to do the same in the future, even if he or she had a really good idea.
And while I find the Samantha Bees and suburban Republicans of the world to be distasteful in their school in their "equity/choice, except if it affects me" stances, it was his duty to convince them of Common Core's quality, or of the necessity of his reforms in breaking poverty cycles. DeVos herself noted this, criticizing both parties.
http://www.federationforchildren.or...Betsy-SXSWedu-speech-final-remarks.pdf?e40fe9
So, because he pissed off literally every portion of America, the Education Secretary got stripped of its power in the latest Every Student Succeeds Act, and to the extent that the office has power, it will be checked by the Congressional education committees.
So, settle down. She cannot do much, positive or negative