Next Ep Promo Spoiler:Who is Chuck toasting in the dark room?
Howard.
Next Ep Promo Spoiler:Who is Chuck toasting in the dark room?
Anyone know why he didn't shoot Tuco instead?
I wasn't the biggest fan of Nacho in season 1, actually I thought he was one of the weakest links, but I really liked him in this episode.
So, Chuck and Jimmy's convo made me think, cause of Jimmy's offer to quit being a lawyer, and he specifically said something like "Jimmy McGill will never be a lawyer again." Which obviously brings to mind the inevitability of him becoming Saul Goodman, right? And the reason for that change.
I'm wondering now if he screws up bad enough as Jimmy McGill with his current job that he gets disbarred, whereby Jimmy McGill literally can't be a lawyer anymore, so he has to become Saul Goodman to continue being a lawyer on his own terms.
I don't think he gets disbarred. He's still defending clients in ABQ, and they know him all over the courthouse. He can't just cop an alias and keep practicing.
That was the same arms dealer that sold Walt that 38 snub right?
Yes it was.
Anyone know why he didn't shoot Tuco instead?
That was the same arms dealer that sold Walt that 38 snub right?
Man, what a great episode.
I hope the show is doing at least decent ratingswise, cuz it's by far my favorite.
So maybe he continues to try to pull Chuck down to his level and get him to break the rules and "extort" Jimmy, and Jimmy comes through on his offer of Jimmy McGill poofing out of existence, only to come back as Saul Goodman and continue practicing law. He gets a win/win by forcing Chuck to get dirty while continuing to practice law on a technicality of his deal with Chuck.
WotMila Kunis needs to pay her rent again.
I can't understand questions like this. Mike very, very clearly explains to Nacho why he thinks it's a bad idea. He spells it out explicitly. What more do you want?Anyone know why he didn't shoot Tuco instead?
Wow, really? Got a full quote? I wonder if he's just like, namedropping people and they retconned that name into a character in BSC or something. Interesting.Disagree on Nacho. He might be killed, but Saul mentions him in his debut in Breaking Bad.
Wow, really? Got a full quote? I wonder if he's just like, namedropping people and they retconned that name into a character in BSC or something. Interesting.
Wot
I can't understand questions like this. Mike very, very clearly explains to Nacho why he thinks it's a bad idea. He spells it out explicitly. What more do you want?
Wow, really? Got a full quote? I wonder if he's just like, namedropping people and they retconned that name into a character in BSC or something. Interesting.
It's when Walt and Jesse bring Saul out and have his head bagged, he guesses who it is and his first guess is Ignacio.
And beaten with a link to the scene in question lol
As someone who hasn't watched Breaking Bad (yet), this show is top notch. I guess it'll give me different perspective when I watch BB for the first time.
As someone who hasn't watched Breaking Bad (yet), this show is top notch. I guess it'll give me different perspective when I watch BB for the first time.
girl bye. you need to watch BB right now! its all on NetflixHaha nice. Damn I really need to rewatch BB one of these days.
So it's what I thought, he's namedropping someone and they probably retconned that name into a character.
Huh? I said rewatch. I've seen BB.girl bye. you need to watch BB right now! its all on Netflix
oh...carry on.. -_-Huh? I said rewatch. I've seen BB.
What I didn't get in that episode was that whole ordeal with Mike's daughter-in-law. Not sure what she was trying to get out of that or why she had to lie about anything.
I thought Chuck had a 'no watch' policy. Keys, watch and phones. But he's wearing one when he's laying on the couch. Did I get it wrong about watches?
if it's a mechanical watch it would be fine right? Or does the fact that it still has a better affect that.I thought Chuck had a 'no watch' policy. Keys, watch and phones. But he's wearing one when he's laying on the couch. Did I get it wrong about watches?
So does Tuco forgive Mike in Breaking Bad, or do they never meet?
The "problem" is digital watches.I thought Chuck had a 'no watch' policy. Keys, watch and phones. But he's wearing one when he's laying on the couch. Did I get it wrong about watches?
Good point, he's already been on billboards as well so his face is known, in the legal community at the least. There was something about the specific language used by Jimmy in that scene though. I just looked up the scene and what he says is, if Chuck sets things right with Kim "I quit the law for good. No more Jimmy McGill, Esquire. POOF like he never even existed."
So maybe he continues to try to pull Chuck down to his level and get him to break the rules and "extort" Jimmy, and Jimmy comes through on his offer of Jimmy McGill poofing out of existence, only to come back as Saul Goodman and continue practicing law. He gets a win/win by forcing Chuck to get dirty while continuing to practice law on a technicality of his deal with Chuck.
I was with Chuck this time and thought he was right. Other than that I really dug the episode. Mike continues to be a badass and it was great seeing Tuco again. I didn't realize it was Krazy 8 in that scene so it was cool to see how that character started out and turned into Krazy 8 since Tuco is gone and locked up.