I could've totally gone for a single origin non fat latte, but instead I had a disgusting energy bar in the backpack and some water.
edit: does it help if there was some muddy trails?
You had a backpack? What sort of mudroadie are you?
Hello everyone!
I really want to get into cycling, but I don't have a road bike. I don't know really much about cycling at all. I want it to be my preferred way of traveling in my town and my way of getting into shape. Does anyone have recommendations for a cheaper starter road bike?
Thank y'all for your time.
The 20 years is going to be a bigger challenge than the multi-speed.I have not ridden a bicycle in 20 years. I never even tried a multi-speed/gear bike. Am I doomed?
Go ask around in the local bike shops and test ride a few bikes to get a feel for your options. Also, where do you live? There's a gazillion different brands out there, many of them regional.
Perhaps it would be more prudent to get a used bike instead of a new one for practice purposes? Not trying to get into extreme mountain biking. Just want to take a weekend ride with my son. He's going to be 4 in April and I want to start going for a bike ride on the weekends with him.The 20 years is going to be a bigger challenge than the multi-speed.
Most single-speed bikes are fixed-gear, which means that you can't coast, and that you can brake by pushing back on the pedals. When switching to multi-speed, you can coast, and you'll have to use the brake levers to come to a stop. When people switch between the two types of bike for the first time, this usually takes maybe .5 to 3 seconds to figure out.
Shifting gears on a bike is extremely easy. All the shifters do is yank the chain left or right so that it skips to another cog. There's no clutching or anything, you just tap a paddle or move a lever or something to direct the chain onto a different gear.
The only caveat is that the chain can't skip around unless it's cycling on the gears, so you generally want to be moving the cranks forward during a shift. In other words, you want to shift to a low gear before coming to a stop, because starting again in a high gear is hard, and switching gears while stopped is also hard.
Thanks. I live in Washington, which is a big place for biking I think?
Thanks. I live in Washington, which is a big place for biking I think?
What part of WA? Some spots are better than others. For example, I live in SW WA and almost all of my riding is done in the Portland area.
Single speed fat bike just seems nuts to me. They're a bastard on climbs at the best of times, let alone with only one gear. I guess you could go really low and then coast all the descents, but I don't know... I'd rather go at least 1x10 given how bombproof that setup is.
Just working out the next stage of my training. By my reckoning I've got about 18 weeks of base training ahead of me...
...I think I'd better find some entertaining things to watch.
What's base training?
Just working out the next stage of my training. By my reckoning I've got about 18 weeks of base training ahead of me...
...I think I'd better find some entertaining things to watch.
Training with what ultimate goal?
Seattle weather just showed up. See you again in April.
Need help on a purchase decision. I'm between these two: Trek Procaliber 9.7 SL and the Trek Fuel EX 7
Any input on these mountain bikes? I'm sticking with a 15.5 frame and 27.5 wheels.
Correct. And the 15.5 frame for Procaliber has 27.5 wheels. The trails I'll be riding aren't the smoothest - I'm leaning towards the EX 7. Thanks for the infoI take it the Procaliber is on closeout? I thought they were only 29" wheels. You are comparing a racing hardtail to a trail full suspension bike so there is a good difference in personality. If you're riding smoother trails I think the Procaliber is hard to beat. If you want a trail bike a Giant Trance 2 for a few hundred more is a much better bike. Or for $100 more a Giant Anthem 2 gets you better fork and crank.
Need help on a purchase decision. I'm between these two: Trek Procaliber 9.7 SL and the Trek Fuel EX 7
Any input on these mountain bikes? I'm sticking with a 15.5 frame and 27.5 wheels.
Hmm.... that first base session was a lot harder than I expected it to be. Was of the understanding it was generally lower heart rates. Need to investigate that further, don't want to be training incorrectly.
you should be constantly at around 65-75% of your max heart rate
now sure how base building works on the trainer programs but pros can climb a category graded hill and maintain that heart rate zone so it's all really relative
Awesome thanks for the info!The bikes are quite different. Procaliber is a light carbon frame XC race hardtail, Fuel EX is an aluminium full suspension all mountain bike. There's like a 3-4kg weight difference between the two and a totally different ride feel. You really need to test ride them both.
edit: for context, I have a lower end Trek hardtail of pretty much the same geometry as the Procaliber, and a Scott all mountain bike much like the Fuel EX. It's really like night and day, you won't be able to know which one you prefer without some time on bike. They'll both go over terrain far beyond your capabilties.
I think this is my fourth base session (Actually, more than that I guess, I've done three entire training plans from start to finish). Don't ever recall getting to such high heart rates previously.i did some searching and friel and the folks at Trainer Road said that during your first base session, you should really only concern yourself with HR zones and ignore power. so that's what i'm doing. i also sent the question into TR so I hope they can discuss more definitively in their next podcast. i'll retest FTP after base 1 and then use power data to gauge efforts from then on, however.
yeah, i'm in the midst of base training too. first time with a power meter, tho and i'm all confused on whether or not to conform to my power zones or hr zones during the first base phase. first session on the trainer my HR was in z2-z3 while my power was in z1. now, my HR tends to run a little high because of the sheer amount of drugs I'm on, but it would seem counterproductive if my HR is running high during base sessions.
i did some searching and friel and the folks at Trainer Road said that during your first base session, you should really only concern yourself with HR zones and ignore power. so that's what i'm doing. i also sent the question into TR so I hope they can discuss more definitively in their next podcast. i'll retest FTP after base 1 and then use power data to gauge efforts from then on, however.
I think this is my fourth base session (Actually, more than that I guess, I've done three entire training plans from start to finish). Don't ever recall getting to such high heart rates previously.
I can handle the workouts, but yeah, still not entirely sure if it's doing me as much good as it should be.
I think this is my fourth base session (Actually, more than that I guess, I've done three entire training plans from start to finish). Don't ever recall getting to such high heart rates previously.
I can handle the workouts, but yeah, still not entirely sure if it's doing me as much good as it should be.
i've always assumed you only focus on your heart rate during base building. afterall, it is all about building your aerobic base.
on the topic of your hr zones and power zones not agreeing, i came across this on my research. i too was curious since this will be the first season i'll be training with a power meter on my new smart trainer
http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2011/12/why-dont-my-power-and-heart-rate-zones-agree.html
i think you're on the right course
just stick with it through the next 12 weeks and you're guaranteed to see your ceiling rise.
Jeff Reed - There is no "correct" way to do this. What I do is use HR when developing aerobic endurance in the early base period. After that I use power only.
Posted by: Joe Friel | 12/13/2011 at 02:07 PM
and maybe you're a bit fatigued? i think you said youre gonna be taking the weekend off, maybe add a few extra days?