norinrad21
Banned
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e33d3/e33d3c06a58336841e793d563cb5392668a76dff" alt="venice4.jpg"
Bobsan is a unique actor, you don`t geth them better than good ol Bill these days
norinrad21 said:![]()
Bobsan is a unique actor, you don`t geth them better than good ol Bill these days
Ninjas4Less said:He's not an actor, he's a character. There's a big difference.
Jim Bowie said:Where is the Zissou love?
Boogie9IGN said:Speaking of which, wtf does that come out on DVD? I want to watch it![]()
Just because he's not playing Russians or retards doesn't mean he isn't an excellent actor. His characters have been very diverse.Ninjas4Less said:He's not an actor, he's a character. There's a big difference.
Ninjas4Less said:He's not an actor, he's a character. There's a big difference.
Fuck Bill Murray. He's the reason Ghostbusters III will never be made.If it wasn't for that, I'd love him as much as the rest of you...
Do you mean disagreement?Crazymoogle said:When Groundhog Day aired on AMC last week, it was interesting to find out that Murray and Ramis had a strong enough agreement on set that Ramis thinks the two of them likely wouldn't ever work together again. (Ramis being the director on GD)
AssMan said:That was his best movie (not to mention my favorite movie of all time). His witty and sarcastic remarks was classic, and he was the perfect fit for Peter Venkman.
![]()
Egon:"I think we should split up."
Peter:"Good idea. We can do a lot more damage that way." :lol
-jinx- said:I cannot believe this thread has gone this far without ANYONE mentioning Lost In Translation. His performance absolutely made the movie, and I don't know if any other actor could have pulled off that combination of charming humor and lonely desperation in the same way.
I ignore pictures in these threads 99% of the time.tralfazz said:Uhh...post #10 says it all.
WordAssassin said:Fuck Bill Murray. He's the reason Ghostbusters III will never be made.If it wasn't for that, I'd love him as much as the rest of you...
JC10001 said:I surprised anyone would even want a Ghostbusters III after Ghostbusters II (which we really didn't need in the first place). The first one was good enough and they should have just left it at that. Just because there is a good movie that doesn't mean there has to be a sequel. Heck, if anything his decision not to further milk that series makes him more admirable to me.