AngmarsKing701
Member
loved BS1. liked BS2.
Will pick up BSI once it hits $40.
Will pick up BSI once it hits $40.
These are the people giving their honest 3.0 to God Hand and end up being reviled by everyone, even though their opinion ought to be as valid as everybody else's. It's just different.Short of objectivity, it would be nice to see a more diversity of opinion. Where are the people like Derrick in the major review sites and magazines? I'm sure they're out there, but there's reason to believe they might be holding their tongues for fear of winding up like Jeff Gerstmann in the Kane and Lynch fiasco.
10's, 10's everywhere.
Well gee, I guess IGN wasn't all that biased now were they conspiracy theory GAF?
I don't disagree with you, but if I went into Bioshock 1 expecting System Shock 2 and I knew System Shock 2 was exactly what I wanted I think I'd also be disappointed.But each game differs in what they focus and excel at, so while Bioshock Infinite might not have deep mechanics like System Shock 2, it might have the better told story and world. I don't think that should be enough to call a game bad though.
That's my point. Even Gamekult, who are known to be harsher than average (they gave Portal 5/10) gave 8/10 to Diablo 3, Dishonored, Darksiders 2, Guild Wars 2, Max Payne 3, Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 3, Skyrim and Tomb Raider, like all the other review sites. We all know how mediocre those games actually were.Reviews for games like this are always a paradox really. Even if the game was awful, I doubt any of the reviews would say so. There is just too much hype.
For the record I'm not saying the game is awful.
Reviews for games like this are always a paradox really. Even if the game was awful, I doubt any of the reviews would say so. There is just too much hype.
For the record I'm not saying the game is awful.
*clicks on Polygon review link*
*sees byline*
*closes tab*
That's my point. Even Gamekult, who are known to be harsher than average (they gave Portal 5/10) gave 8/10 to Diablo 3, Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 3, Skyrim and Tomb Raider.
Well, critics of books and films have a general consensus of what constitutes "good" cinematography, writing, acting, etc. I know that playing a game is a much more fluid, personal experience and I wouldn't argue that there have to be universal standards of what makes a good game. There's obviously a continuum of comparing something to a precise, external set of criteria and just giving your own opinion, but we're a little too far on the side of "I thought it was fun, therefore 10/10" right now.
Short of objectivity, it would be nice to see a more diversity of opinion. Where are the people like Derrick in the major review sites and magazines? I'm sure they're out there, but there's reason to believe they might be holding their tongues for fear of winding up like Jeff Gerstmann in the Kane and Lynch fiasco.
One thing i wonder as well is how many reviews are just knee jerk reactions? How many reviewers back and play a game once or twice before giving a final score? For example, people gushed over RE4 and it deserves its praise. However, the game does start to get a little long in the tooth towards the end. I feel that to really give a fair score you need to step away from the material, let it sink in, and experience it again. I believe thats why games on neogaf get so much backlash. Everyone gets all caught up in initial emotions and hype. But its not until you play something without any preconceived hype that you can see the chinks in the armor.
The point I'm making is that you shouldn't expect Systemshock 2.I don't disagree with you, but if I went into Bioshock 1 expecting System Shock 2 and I knew System Shock 2 was exactly what I wanted I think I'd also be disappointed.
That's my point. Even Gamekult, who are known to be harsher than average (they gave Portal 5/10) gave 8/10 to Diablo 3, Dishonored, Darksiders 2, Guild Wars 2, Max Payne 3, Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 3, Skyrim and Tomb Raider, like all the other review sites. We all know how mediocre those games actually were.
Here's the review.Ive played portal many times and i am hard pressed to agree with that assessment or see how they came to that conclusion. If portal is an average game with all of its charm and inventiveness then i dont know what to say. And that game has no spectacle at all.
I mean that there are certain standards that critics of film and literature share. Proper criticism in those mediums isn't just about saying "I liked it, so it was good," it involves comparing the work in question to standards that developed over a long time out of academic study of film and literary theory. Opinion is still involved, of course, but the overall assessment is supposed to be informed by the history and inner workings of the medium. My issue is that game reviewers can be very myopic and often rely too heavily on gut impressions, as opposed to a more academic understanding of how video games work.
That's my point. Even Gamekult, who are known to be harsher than average (they gave Portal 5/10) gave 8/10 to Diablo 3, Dishonored, Darksiders 2, Guild Wars 2, Max Payne 3, Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 3, Skyrim and Tomb Raider, like all the other review sites. We all know how mediocre those games actually were.
I'm rather pleased Elizabeth is with you most of the game, my favorite part of the Half Life 2 episodes was when you had Alyx with you
I think it's hilarious how such a highly anticipated game getting universal praise automatically means it is a steaming pile to some. Like, there is just no way it could actually be a good game. It has to suck no matter what.
To each their own of course, but just maybe a lot went into making this one and the reviews simply reflect as much. They have been slaving away on this game for years now and I am inclined to believe that this is one of the cases where they simply were not going to stop until they had something great. That is usually how landmark games are made.
Here's the review.
And here's a translation in case you need one.
tl;dr: Portal is not worth 15 for two hours, get The Orange Box instead.
I think it's hilarious how such a highly anticipated game getting universal praise automatically means it is a steaming pile to some. Like, there is just no way it could actually be a good game. It has to suck no matter what.
To each their own of course, but just maybe a lot went into making this one and the reviews simply reflect as much. They have been slaving away on this game for years now and I am inclined to believe that this is one of the cases where they simply were not going to stop until they had something great. That is usually how landmark games are made.
Well, they gave The Orange Box an 8...Sorry but that review is shit. The text is extremely positive presenting only one flaw. I mean the game is fresh, inventive, and positively humorous and that equates to a five? Its average because its a short game which was it purpose in the first place? Im curious. Wasnt portal 1 first released as part of the orange box and then as a stand alone for people who didnt want the other four games?
I think it's hilarious how such a highly anticipated game getting universal praise automatically means it is a steaming pile to some. Like, there is just no way it could actually be a good game. It has to suck no matter what.
To each their own of course, but just maybe a lot went into making this one and the reviews simply reflect as much. They have been slaving away on this game for years now and I am inclined to believe that this is one of the cases where they simply were not going to stop until they had something great. That is usually how landmark games are made.
I think it's hilarious how such a highly anticipated game getting universal praise automatically means it is a steaming pile to some. Like, there is just no way it could actually be a good game. It has to suck no matter what.
To each their own of course, but just maybe a lot went into making this one and the reviews simply reflect as much. They have been slaving away on this game for years now and I am inclined to believe that this is one of the cases where they simply were not going to stop until they had something great. That is usually how landmark games are made.
I think part of it is some of us got fooled the first 2 times with Bioshock 1 and 2 which both had universal praise which was later decided to be off the mark as they had big issues ranging from overpromising, to DRM, to flawed gameplay. I would expect the intelligent gamer to approach this with cautious optimism as much credibility has been tarnished, not just with the series but of reviewers of the series.
Well, I think we'll need to play the game first to decide if it has any place among classic literature.
That's my point. Even Gamekult, who are known to be harsher than average (they gave Portal 5/10) gave 8/10 to Diablo 3, Dishonored, Darksiders 2, Guild Wars 2, Max Payne 3, Mass Effect 3, Assassin's Creed 3, Skyrim and Tomb Raider, like all the other review sites. We all know how mediocre those games actually were.
This is NeoGAF dude.People are so silly.
If the game scored 7/10 - 8/10 range everyone be like OMG FLOP.
Game averaging a 95 on meta, a score most games never get, and people are calling it "oh it was expected blahblahbalh.. overhyped ermagherd"
Regardless of what it scores, no one is EVER happy.
At what point do we just sit down and accept game reviews for what they are?
Seriously."We all know how mediocre those games actually are"
Ugh. Seriously?
Sorry but that review is shit. The text is extremely positive presenting only one flaw. I mean the game is fresh, inventive, and positively humorous and that equates to a five? Its average because its a short game which was it purpose in the first place? Im curious. Wasnt portal 1 first released as part of the orange box and then as a stand alone for people who didnt want the other four games?
loved BS1. liked BS2.
Will pick up BSI once it hits $40.
At what point do we just sit down and accept game reviews for what they are?
They're probably reading the text.People are so silly.
If the game scored 7/10 - 8/10 range everyone be like OMG FLOP.
Game averaging a 95 on meta, a score most games never get, and people are calling it "oh it was expected blahblahbalh.. overhyped ermagherd"
Regardless of what it scores, no one is EVER happy.
At what point do we just sit down and accept game reviews for what they are?