• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Black Lives Matter shuts down a Bernie Sanders rally

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pulling another one where the argument is Bernie's a racist because he doesn't consider Argentina an awesome example of socialism better than Scandanavia, even.

If186TV.png
 

soleil

Banned
Pulling another one where the argument is Bernie's a racist because he doesn't consider Argentina an awesome example of socialism better than Scandanavia, even.
There's people out there saying that you don't know if Bernie is going to change his mind or not on anything he says, but Hillary is solid and firm in her beliefs.

Their reasoning? Bernie changed parties a few times since the 60s, but Hillary's been a Democrat this whole time.

No mention from these people about whether or not their stances on issues have changed.
 
Well, I mean technically it's not wrong. It does seem to follow kamikaze's logic that liberals are the enemy though.

See, we were having such a decent time smoothing things over, and now you had to do this.

No, liberals are not the enemy. I'm a fucking liberal (I've already said this, and that I plan on supporting Bernie in the primary). But did many white liberals verbally attack and harass many black activists this weekend, including myself? Yes, by the droves.

There is a clear problem. A long running historical problem, but I'm not going to go by this black and white logic.
 
Pulling another one where the argument is Bernie's a racist because he doesn't consider Argentina an awesome example of socialism better than Scandanavia, even.

If186TV.png

Ah yes, the Cuban Revolution that lead to hundreds of thousands of Cubans who wanted to escape the oppressive regime. That Cuban Revolution.

I don't know too much about socialism in Argentina, or other Latin American countries, so I can't comment.
 

werks

Banned
I think ultimately, this protest is a good thing. Like last time. And hopefully BLM continues to protest more candidates too.
I don't, I think Bernie needs to increase his security so that random people claiming to be BLM can't push him off stage BUT at the same time engage and embrace legitimate BLM leaders with his campaign.

As for Marrisa Jenea, I don't think the views of outside agitators is in line with the BLM movement. Asking the black community to respond or defend her views is not fair and doesn't serve anyone's interests.
 
Likewise, if youre not happy that this fraud of a woman led an interruption to seize the microphone from Bernie (it wasn't enough that it would be given to her, she had to shut him up), then you are a racist and an enemy of BLM. The same shit is being peddled by people on the other side of this discussion. Its either you enthusiastically approve of every single person, event, moment that affiliates itself with BLM, or fuck you. And now this pisspoor excuse for reasoning is being used to characterize people who support Bernie Sanders (nowhere close to the monolithic entity you need it to be) in a negative way.

And absolutely no responsibility has been taken from the countless lies said about what Bernie hasn't said or done publicly that have since been disproven by video links posted in this thread. I see a lot of people continuing to discuss this that have trashed their credibility early in this thread by making claims about Bernie Sanders when they clearly never cared to look into whether what they were making up on the spot was true or not.

But call me a stan or whatever.

I don't think it was the most tactful way to get a point across either, but that doesn't change the fact that many people are skeptical of promises made by politicians and wanted to push Bernie to more clearly acknowledge racism as its own problem rather than a symptom of economic disparity. When some supporters treat critiques of a candidate as something that has to be stomped out in an aggressive way, it does nothing to convince those who are as yet unconvinced to vote for a candidate.

I think the BLM movement, those who are wary of Bernie anyway, are essentially asking him to prove himself to be the ideal candidate and not just the less-than-ideal-but-better-than-the-alternatives candidate in regard to racial injustice. As ambassadors of the campaign, as it were, we do ourselves no favors to address people's grievances with "Well if you don't like it then you don't know what's best for you". It's important to be accommodating to those yet unconvinced, regardless of their hostility when expressing concerns.

And I don't think you're a Stan. I just think it's important to recognize the importance of solidarity without this "only if they do it first" approach. As Bernie's campaign said, "we stand together". It's important to act like it and not just say it.
 

werks

Banned
I don't think it was the most tactful way to get a point across either, but that doesn't change the fact that many people are skeptical of promises made by politicians and wanted to push Bernie to more clearly acknowledge racism as its own problem rather than a symptom of economic disparity. When some supporters treat critiques of a candidate as something that has to be stomped out in an aggressive way, it does nothing to convince those who are as yet unconvinced to vote for a candidate.

I think the BLM movement, those who are wary of Bernie anyway, are essentially asking him to prove himself to be the ideal candidate and not just the less-than-ideal-but-better-than-the-alternatives candidate in regard to racial injustice. As ambassadors of the campaign, as it were, we do ourselves no favors to address people's grievances with "Well if you don't like it then you don't know what's best for you". It's important to be accommodating to those yet unconvinced, regardless of their hostility when expressing concerns.

And I don't think you're a Stan. I just think it's important to recognize the importance of solidarity without this "only if they do it first" approach. As Bernie's campaign said, "we stand together". It's important to act like it and not just say it.
Agreed. I've been guilty of everything you said in that post. It took looking past my anger to realize I was just pushing people away.
 
See, we were having such a decent time smoothing things over, and now you had to do this.

No, liberals are not the enemy. I'm a fucking liberal (I've already said this, and that I plan on supporting Bernie in the primary). But did many white liberals verbally attack and harass many black activists this weekend, including myself? Yes, by the droves.

There is a clear problem. A long running historical problem, but I'm not going to go by this black and white logic.

Are you talking about being attacked on Neogaf?
 
See, we were having such a decent time smoothing things over, and now you had to do this.

No, liberals are not the enemy. I'm a fucking liberal (I've already said this, and that I plan on supporting Bernie in the primary). But did many white liberals verbally attack and harass many black activists this weekend, including myself? Yes, by the droves.

There is a clear problem. A long running historical problem, but I'm not going to go by this black and white logic.

Who attacked you here? You were criticized including by me...but I didn't see anything out of bounds.

The only harassing I saw was the two women who interrupted Sanders in such a childish, ignorant fashion.
 
I don't think it was the most tactful way to get a point across either, but that doesn't change the fact that many people are skeptical of promises made by politicians and wanted to push Bernie to more clearly acknowledge racism as its own problem rather than a symptom of economic disparity. When some supporters treat critiques of a candidate as something that has to be stomped out in an aggressive way, it does nothing to convince those who are as yet unconvinced to vote for a candidate.

I think the BLM movement, those who are wary of Bernie anyway, are essentially asking him to prove himself to be the ideal candidate and not just the less-than-ideal-but-better-than-the-alternatives candidate in regard to racial injustice. As ambassadors of the campaign, as it were, we do ourselves no favors to address people's grievances with "Well if you don't like it then you don't know what's best for you". It's important to be accommodating to those yet unconvinced, regardless of their hostility when expressing concerns.

And I don't think you're a Stan. I just think it's important to recognize the importance of solidarity without this "only if they do it first" approach. As Bernie's campaign said, "we stand together". It's important to act like it and not just say it.
As werks said above, if this was Outside Agitators who seemed to have simply stated a plan to form a Seattle branch of BLM, and her group does not represent the views of BLM, then isnt about 90% of this discussion about defending or criticizing BLM moot?

People are playing devils advocate and saying "well he may be the last candidate on the list to deserve the criticism of the protest but they are all fair game". Well if the leader of this group is an extreme christian Palin supporter from what I'm reading, are we sure we know why he was really targeted? I'm not talking conspiracies, but someone would those ties seems like they would benefit from harming the campaign of someone on the other far side of the political spectrum. You might say she could foresee he would refocus his message to his own benefit in reaction to this, but if we are talking about a Palin supporter we are not talking about the sharpest knife.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
I don't, I think Bernie needs to increase his security so that random people claiming to be BLM can't push him off stage BUT at the same time engage and embrace legitimate BLM leaders with his campaign.

As for Marrisa Jenea, I don't think the views of outside agitators is in line with the BLM movement. Asking the black community to respond or defend her views is not fair and doesn't serve anyone's interests.

Another poster said the same thing. He was taking the other position though: that either Bernie does a better job at handling the protesters or he gets more security to make himself look better. As if optics was the issue here. It's completely missing the point. It can be the case that this protest was unreasonable and they have an otherwise good cause. It can be the case that the actions that these two people did aren't necessarily 100% actions I agree with-- but ultimately it's not the worst thing that could happen in this race. The only thing I'm worried about is that certain people are just looking for someone who is rhetorically on their side; we've seen in this thread a lot of unwillingness to acknowledge that Bernie has in fact addressed their issues and that they just didn't know about it. And protests themselves should be more inclusive, including attacking Republican candidates.

Earlier, I thought by attacking Sanders they'd only be helping the mainstream corporate candidate. But I don't think in the long run it damages Bernie at all -- it makes him a stronger candidate if he addresses them in a way they find preferable. I also do think it pushes Hillary to at least speak as if she cares about these issues which in itself is a good thing.
 

FartOfWar

Banned
Ah yes, the Cuban Revolution that lead to hundreds of thousands of Cubans who wanted to escape the oppressive regime. That Cuban Revolution.

I don't know too much about socialism in Argentina, or other Latin American countries, so I can't comment.

Venezuela's been a wonderland. All nations aspire to its current situation.
 

theecakee

Member
I think ultimately, this protest is a good thing. Like last time. And hopefully BLM continues to protest more candidates too.

By what part? They got Bernie to write up a 10 page report that should have been taken for granted based on his political history and the "harmful white liberals" are completely polarized from the movement.

I support criminal justice reform, but anything said under the BLM label I'm not taking seriously anymore because of events like this and others.
 
By what part? They got Bernie to write up a 10 page report that should have been taken for granted based on his political history and the "harmful white liberals" are completely polarized from the movement.

I support criminal justice reform, but anything said under the BLM label I'm not taking seriously anymore because of events like this.
Well Im readong that this wasnt BLM but was OA, but the same people are defending this as BLM so I dont know.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
By what part? They got Bernie to write up a 10 page report that should have been taken for granted based on his political history and the "harmful white liberals" are completely polarized from the movement.

I support criminal justice reform, but anything said under the BLM label I'm not taking seriously anymore because of events like this.

Like I posted a minute ago. I still think it was a waste of time to go after Bernie in particular. But if it gets people to talk about these issues -- then I think it's a good thing overall. You're also lumping the actions of these two individuals who have yet to actually form a chapter in Seattle with a national movement demanding people respect black lives. They are not a homogenous group.
 
As werks said above, if this was Outside Agitators who seemed to have simply stated a plan to form a Seattle branch of BLM, and her group does not represent the views of BLM, then isnt about 90% of this discussion about defending or criticizing BLM moot?

People are playing devils advocate and saying "well he may be the last candidate on the list to deserve the criticism of the protest but they are all fair game". Well if the leader of this group is an extreme christian Plain supporter from what Im reading, are we sure we know why he was really targeted? Im not talking conspiracies, but someone would those ties seems like they would benefit from harming the campaign of someone on the other far side of the political spectrum. You might say she could foresee he would refocus his message to his own benefit, but we are talking a Palin fan so I wont assume any cleverness.

Sorry for the confusion, I was addressing how the debate over this has unfolded online, not necessarily how people feel about the Palin supporter girl specifically. Obviously, she seems to be beyond convincing. When talking to other people about this, though, I don't think it will do Bernie any favors to be combative or dismissive, as some have been. It's important to understand first and react second, not just react. I think that applies in all circumstances, not just here. If we're confident in Bernie's merits as a leader, there's no need to shoot down critiques or inquiries as though we're insecure.
 

theecakee

Member
Like I posted a minute ago. I still think it was a waste of time to go after Bernie in particular. But if it gets people to talk about these issues -- then I think it's a good thing overall.

For all the wrong reasons, nobody is really speaking highly of the movement because they harassed him.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
Sorry for the confusion, I was addressing how the debate over this has unfolded online, not necessarily how people feel about the Palin supporter girl specifically. Obviously, she seems to be beyond convincing. When talking to other people about this, though, I don't think it will do Bernie any favors to be combative or dismissive, as some have been. It's important to understand first and react second, not just react. I think that applies in all circumstances, not just here. If we're confident in Bernie's merits as a leader, there's no need to shoot down critiques or inquiries as though we're insecure.

Honestly speaking though, I don't know how Bernie could have handled the situation any better. He certainly handled better than the last time.

For all the wrong reasons, nobody is really speaking highly of the movement because they harassed him.

I don't see how that's the whole movement's fault. It sounds more like other people's fault. And by getting people to talk about these issues: I meant the candidates like O'Malley, Bernie and Hillary.
 

werks

Banned
Sorry for the confusion, I was addressing how the debate over this has unfolded online, not necessarily how people feel about the Palin supporter girl specifically. Obviously, she seems to be beyond convincing. When talking to other people about this, though, I don't think it will do Bernie any favors to be combative or dismissive, as some have been. It's important to understand first and react second, not just react. I think that applies in all circumstances, not just here. If we're confident in Bernie's merits as a leader, there's no need to shoot down critiques or inquiries as though we're insecure.

Absolutely. No matter what the intentions of outside agitators were, obviously there was a weakness in Bernie's campaign that opened him up to that sort of attack. I think the swift boat attacks on john Kerry proves how easy it is to turn a strength into weakness and dominate the narrative. It was a net positive for Bernie to be exposed to attacks on his strengths early on and tweak his campaign to address those attacks.
 

JDSN

Banned
Im glad Bernie made some changes and I hope they continue while on the road, he is a better candidate because of it, maybe the democratic party in general need to be put through this because if this thread is any indication, the attitude that minorities should shut the fuck up and be thankful allies is an actual thing in 2015.
 
Honestly speaking though, I don't know how Bernie could have handled the situation any better. He certainly handled better than the last time.

Oh, I think Bernie himself handled it fine. Imagine if Bernie handled it like some online have, though, and shouted over her saying "Don't you see I'm trying to help you people!?!?"

He would be rightfully catching a lot of flak for it.

While it may be unfair, a candidate's supporters reflect on his or her campaign, so it's important to treat people with respect, listen to them, react calmly, avoid insulting them, etc. Just as one would if they themselves were the candidate.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
Oh, I think Bernie himself handled it fine. Imagine if Bernie handled it like some online have, though, and shouted over her saying "Don't you see I'm trying to help you people!?!?"

He would be rightfully catching a lot of flak for it.

While it may be unfair, a candidate's supporters reflect on his or her campaign, so it's important to treat people with respect, listen to them, react calmly, avoid insulting them, etc. Just as one would if they themselves were the candidate.

"I marched with MLK." Would probably be the worst response -- and yet a lot of people on twitter seem to go for that one.
 
Here is a new post from The South Lawn, which I've posted before in this thread.



Powerful stuff, really a blog I'd suggest following closely this election cycle.

I feel that at times the scariest thing to many black activists (and their general supporters) isn't the continuation of racist and unequal policies, but rather them succeeding. After decades of fighting to have things like police brutality, segregationist policies, and discrimination to be cemented in American legislation, what then? What is the next task from them to cover after completing that objective? So when candidates come along that actually support these policies, it may be a little uneasy for them to agree. A "No True Scotsman" trope is churned out. Similar things happen with the far left in this country as well. Winning seems to be the biggest fear of all at times.
 

JustenP88

I earned 100 Gamerscore™ for collecting 300 widgets and thereby created Trump's America
So here's a fun quote from the website of the group disrupting Sanders events, Outside Agitators.

ugwD1uT.png

So, the Democratic party is a threat to black people because... Black people are mostly Democrats? So, black people aren't capable of deciding what's in their best interest regarding politics?
 
"I marched with MLK." Would probably be the worst response -- and yet a lot of people on twitter seem to go for that one.

Yeah. Like, I get that people want to make an argument in favor of their candidate and have a right to do so, but it's important to consider that if you're overly emotional, aggressive, naive to the concerns of those you're addressing and so forth, the best service you can offer is to watch quietly from the sidelines. It does the campaign no favors to play keyboard warrior and defend your castle without realizing you aren't supposed to defend, you're supposed to invite people in.
 

theecakee

Member
I don't see how that's the whole movement's fault. It sounds more like other people's fault. And by getting people to talk about these issues: I meant the candidates like O'Malley, Bernie and Hillary.

They've already talked about it, several times before. O'Malley already had a plan up on his site before this happened, Bernie has talked about it at several events, and I'm sure Hillary has.


When has America ever really spoken highly of black people who want to spark change?

I did, I have put my neck on the line in the predominantly white rural area I live in. Like I said I still fully support criminal justice reform as one of the top issues that needs to be addressed...but I'm not going to support any protests or argue for BLM anymore I just look like a fool to people doing this.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
"I marched with MLK." Would probably be the worst response -- and yet a lot of people on twitter seem to go for that one.

How about "Go vote for Trump. See how that works out."?
 

soleil

Banned
How about "Go vote for Trump. See how that works out."?
But this is telling people to settle for the best option and not push for even better. Ironically, part of the support Bernie is getting is from people who are sick of being told to settle for the lesser of two evils.
 

Gattsu25

Banned
You are right that's it's not. There are plenty of legitimate complaints about racism within progressive, the movement is no where near perfect when it comes to race issues. But it's hard to reconcile finding racism with sanders while supporting palin.

No disagreements there.

Palin supporters == fringe tea party
 

Foffy

Banned
Pulling another one where the argument is Bernie's a racist because he doesn't consider Argentina an awesome example of socialism better than Scandanavia, even.

If186TV.png

Holy shit, that's funny. Sanders was aiming for the higher echelon of democratic socialist societies. It had absolutely nothing to do with whiteness.

If we are the so-called best nation on earth, should we not be taking inspiration from places accomplishing better things than us? Scandinavia, Denmark, and Switzerland are all empirical locations where equality and quality of life are some of the highest in the world. From what I know of positions in Switzerland, I'd even consider that to be the most humane society on this earth with many policies they have.

They're one of the few nations on this earth that you are given a right to end your life, in a world that puts people on probation for their suffering. If only the rest of the world was lucky to not have evocated concepts - laws - in the way of themselves.
 

Slayven

Member
She doubles down that the crowd are white supremacists racists. uhh.. I believe she also mentioned her parents are tea partyers? Correct me if I'm wrong.

She did, her mother is right. She talked to them the night before and said "We don't understand your politics, but we support you"
 

JustenP88

I earned 100 Gamerscore™ for collecting 300 widgets and thereby created Trump's America
She did, her mother is right. She talked to them the night before and said "We don't understand your politics, but we support you"

So, I guess that explains the whole Sarah Palin business. I imagine she was pretty young back then.
 
She doubles down that the crowd are white supremacists racists. uhh..

"Anyone who hears me say that (pretty sure it was either about her calling the crowd racist or saying her life matters) and thinks about their feelings first is a White supremacist"

Bold statement. And I don't know if I agree with it, but there is a problem if their feelings come first.
 
She did, her mother is right. She talked to them the night before and said "We don't understand your politics, but we support you"

I think that the ridiculous part about it is that people are trying to dig up shocking dirt on her by saying "as a teen, her political views were influenced by her parents!"

Which takes me to a related tangent of how much I can't stand when people criticize or insult black people for voting for the right. I think I'm slightly critical of anyone who votes to the right (just because I revile the Republican politicians running), but it's like black people don't have the right to make that mistake like white people do.
 

werks

Banned
"Anyone who hears me say that (pretty sure it was either about her calling the crowd racist or saying her life matters) and thinks about their feelings first is a White supremacist"

Bold statement. And I don't know if I agree with it, but there is a problem if their feelings come first.
That's a bunch of crap. If a woman called you a sexist, and you thought that you weren't sexist, then you are a sexist???? That's one hell of an argument.
 
That's a bunch of crap. If a woman called you a sexist, and you thought that you weren't sexist, then you are a sexist???? That's one hell of an argument.

I think, even if the accusation of white supremacy is hyperbolic, it is important to not let your feelings allow you to lose sight of more important things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom