It's been rectified nowMauler and EFAP is good stuff, unfortunately their video got copyright claimed by Disney.
It's been rectified now
The final act(when things start exploding in the air) alone requires so much suspension of disbelieve.
When will people stop making this weak argument?It's an MCU movie.
Robot suits.
Super power sources.
Monsters.
Advanced AI
Super soldiers.
Laser guns.
Asgardian Gods.
Flying people.
Giant hovering ships.
Aliens.
Teleporting cubes.
Elves.
Reality ether.
Cryogenic sleep.
Robot limbs.
Talking raccoons and trees.
Spaceships.
Power stones.
Shrinking people.
Growing people.
Vibranium.
Wizards.
Teleporting.
Alternate realities.
Time controlling amulets.
Light speed travel.
Giant fire demons.
Hell spawn lizard creatures.
Time travel.
Witches.
Magic.
Is all that supposed to excuse bad decisions characters make in the movie?(Taskmaster just has to kill Natasha personally rather than let her fall to certain death). Most of those things aren't even relevant to this movie.It's an MCU movie.
Robot suits.
Super power sources.
Monsters.
Advanced AI
Super soldiers.
Laser guns.
Asgardian Gods.
Flying people.
Giant hovering ships.
Aliens.
Teleporting cubes.
Elves.
Reality ether.
Cryogenic sleep.
Robot limbs.
Talking raccoons and trees.
Spaceships.
Power stones.
Shrinking people.
Growing people.
Vibranium.
Wizards.
Teleporting.
Alternate realities.
Time controlling amulets.
Light speed travel.
Giant fire demons.
Hell spawn lizard creatures.
Time travel.
Witches.
Magic.
Is all that supposed to excuse bad decisions characters make in the movie?(Taskmaster just has to kill Natasha personally rather than let her fall to certain death). Most of those things aren't even relevant to this movie.
Or key items appearing out of nowhere?
Or establishs that the widows can withstand explosions from less than a meter away or survive debris pushing them through the floor? Is there really no point for you at which an MCU movie takes too many liberties with physics and how humans can survive disasters?
The MCU has contradicted/deviated from the comics several times. How serious can you still look at the comics for explanations? Also It is really good film making when you have to look at sources outside the MCU for answers?Natasha has been through worse in the comics. It's all good.
It's been rectified now
The final act(when things start exploding in the air) alone requires so much suspension of disbelieve.
I assume their fans do, usually they BS around a little before they start with the topic video for an hour or so which I usually skip.This video is over 7 and a half hours long. Do people really listen to the whole thing?
IMO this film had one of the strongest endings of any standalone Marvel character films... maybe Thor Ragnarok tops it.The air drop is easily one of my favorite parts, I wish they didn't show any of it in the trailers.
The MCU has contradicted/deviated from the comics several times. How serious can you still look at the comics for explanations? Also It is really good film making when you have to look at sources outside the MCU for answers?
Widow is no superhero so I don't expect her to defy the laws of physics as much as she does in the movie.It's a fucking superhero film... there's people in floating cities commanding mind controlled assassins... what realism are you seeking here?
I skipped around the video out of curiosity and it seems like it's hours of nitpicking. I didn't think the film was amazing or anything but this seems like such a soulless form of criticism.I assume their fans do, usually they BS around a little before they start with the topic video for an hour or so which I usually skip.
It's not uncommon for EFAP sessions to last that long or even longer. They pause nearly every scene and comment on it, especially when there's a lot of nonsense going on.
I linked it form the final act of the movie.
What do you call nitpicking? Things that allow the plot advance I wouldn't call nitpicks and they usually are forthcoming if they're discussing petty things in a scene.I skipped around the video out of curiosity and it seems like it's hours of nitpicking. I didn't think the film was amazing or anything but this seems like such a soulless form of criticism.
If you mean Pugh then she is pretty bottom heavy, not many could handle that in tight latexI did wonder why Scarjo's suit was so tight and the other girls was loose. I want everyone in tight suits.
I don't think people mind that.If you mean Pugh then she is pretty bottom heavy, not many could handle that in tight latex
The moment you had it queued up to start on for example. It's them saying the explosion she ran past should have killed her. But those kinds of things happen all the time in action films. People narrowly avoiding explosions that in reality might have killed them is exciting for the audience. "Death dyfing stunts" appeal to people for that reason. Also nothing I heard was discussing anything deeper like themes. It was all just surface level "why didn't they just..." It just feels like it's another example of modern film criticism just being people pointing out plot holes, which is pretty dull.What do you call nitpicking? Things that allow the plot advance I wouldn't call nitpicks and they usually are forthcoming if they're discussing petty things in a scene.
Granted I've only watched from where I linked and not this full EFAP yet.
They usually are consistent and wouldn't give such a scene a pass in other movies either. I think they bring up a theme near the end about family which they felt falls flat.The moment you had it queued up to start on for example. It's them saying the explosion she ran past should have killed her. But those kinds of things happen all the time in action films. People narrowly avoiding explosions that in reality might have killed them is exciting for the audience. "Death dyfing stunts" appeal to people for that reason. Also nothing I heard was discussing anything deeper like themes. It was all just surface level "why didn't they just..." It just feels like it's another example of modern film criticism just being people pointing out plot holes, which is pretty dull.
Fair enough, I usually just skip to a scene I'd like to hear their take on like the prison break out scene(4:48:00), how much plot armor it involves and how it destroys Natasha's core values that come with her heroism.I'm maybe being unfair here since like I said I just skipped about. So maybe I'd have a better understanding of it if I watched the full thing. But it's 7 hours and 40 minutes so I'm not going to do that.
It's a fucking superhero film... there's people in floating cities commanding mind controlled assassins... what realism are you seeking here?
Does anyone know if this will get a release in China?
Long Man Bad's breakdown on all the character assassinations
That were all preordained by Khan