I agree it's too slow and too long. Loved the original (which is also pretty slow) but this was too portentous and plodding to be enjoyable, for me.
Also, Ryan Gosling doesn't have the charisma to carry a film like this on his own.
I haven't seen the film yet, but I know this right here is nonsense.
The Gos' is one of our very best right now.
I agree it's too slow and too long. Loved the original (which is also pretty slow) but this was too portentous and plodding to be enjoyable, for me.
Also, Ryan Gosling doesn't have the charisma to carry a film like this on his own.
AMxKaOtIcDeV said:Gosling is literally one of the best leading men we have
Yup. The Gos knocked it out of the ballpark with this film. Loved him as K.
So wrong, Gosling is literally one of the best leading men we have.
aw hell naw
The score is actually even better when listened to on its own.
Memories of Green
Blade Runner Blues
Rachel's Song
Love Theme
Fading Away
That is a damning indictment on modern day Hollywood.
Not really. Gosling is great. Dude has played a more diverse selection of roles than people realize.
That is a damning indictment on modern day Hollywood.
The guy has more range than Harrison Ford ever had at his peak. If "modern day Hollywood" is one that's filled with multifaceted actors then it's a Hollywood I'll gladly take.That is a damning indictment on modern day Hollywood.
Nope. Only the theatrical cut doesn't fit the continuity.I know Final Cut is the one that everyone always recommends, but for people that have seen 2049 - does it solidify in any way that final cut is the canon cut? I'm not familiar with all the differences. Probably going rewatch the original later before seeing 2049 tonight.
He's truly the greatest actor in Hollywood.
He's truly the greatest actor in Hollywood.
I'm listening to the 2049 score right now and it doesn't really sound like a typical Zimmer score to me, at least not like one he's done in the last decade+. It sounds to me like a more dynamic version of something Johan would do.
Ryan Gosling?
I'm fucking HERE for this Ryan Gosling love-in.
Every scene builds atmosphere or contributes to character development. Saying there are completely needless scenes embeds the claim that you understand the purpose each scene should serve. Quite honestly, if you're going to throw around terms like "dull" and "long" when you're discussing a purposefully moody, atmospheric film that is consistent in its use of deliberately paced shots and wordless sequences, your grasp of cinematic technique is probably not as firm as you'd like to think.
There can be more to a scene than blasting the audience with exposition or serving up pulse pounding action. Every drawn-out sequence is an invitation to immerse yourself in the world or imagine the inner lives of the characters. Each seemingly pointless interlude was designed and presented to you for reasons that might demand some careful thought to discover. How can you have the experience the director intended if you're impatiently waiting for your expectations to be fulfilled?
Movies have so much to offer if you can leave your preconceptions at the door and let them unfold on their own terms. "What happens next?" is not always the most important or appropriate question.
But he's not even the best actor in Blade Runner.
Yeah, ok, you've convinced me. It's wrong to criticise any film ever made. Well done. Have a 100 internet points.
Jared Leto? Gaff? Harrison Ford?
The music in this movie couldn't be more Johann Johannsson if it tried.
Retired.
Harrison Ford puts out a much better and charismatic performance in the film, IMO.
Ryan does a fine job, I just don't think he's quite as good as people say he is.
I agree it's too slow and too long. Loved the original (which is also pretty slow) but this was too portentous and plodding to be enjoyable, for me.
Also, Ryan Gosling doesn't have the charisma to carry a film like this on his own.
Harrison Ford puts out a much better and charismatic performance in the film, IMO.
Ryan does a fine job, I just don't think he's quite as good as people say he is.
Lol, this is the dumbest response.
Do I have to watch the first blade runner to understand the new one?
I wonder what the fuck Johann was doing, then... Given that Denis copped that he let Johann go to back to something closer to the original Vangelis.
Retired.
man just browsing my local theaters that have reserved seating for showings tonight and every single one is like 95% open.....
He's better.
Again, the same guy was criticised for being monotone and mumbling and lacking charisma. So he made a Shane Black film and was hilarious. Then he made a musical despite having minimal dance and singing experience.
It seems like you have a weird issue with him, but in versatility alone he's in his own league.
It's the appropriate response to that load of twaddle.
His post is the fucking opposite of twaddle. Just because he disagrees with you doesn't make it "twaddle." It's a pretty well-written post, you don't have to agree with it.
Loved the movie except for 3 or 4 handhold on moments.
Phenomenal special effects and cinematography, the soundscape and score and acting all top notch.
But man, those handheld story moments need to be excised in a directors cut/workprint/final cut. Pronto
Nope. Only the theatrical cut doesn't fit the continuity.