Bloomberg: iPad 3 in March with retina display, quad core chip

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think I'm gonna take the hit and sell my iPad 2 after the announcement. I'm worried about the possibility of not having an iPad for a month if it ends up releasing late March or early April.
 
I think I'm gonna take the hit and sell my iPad 2 after the announcement. I'm worried about the possibility of not having an iPad for a month if it ends up releasing late March or early April.
Isn't Foxconn doing 24/7 shifts to get enough for March?
 
Sheeeeit. How much did you get for the precious?

420 including plastic smart cover. 16 gb wifi model.

Happy with that. Dude who bought it (coworker) knows that a new one will be announced soon so I don't feel like I was trying to pull a fast one over anyone.
 
http://www.macrumors.com/2012/02/17/confirmed-ipad-3-has-a-2048x1536-retina-display/

macrumors said:
MacRumors has now been able to obtain one of these iPad 3 displays and examine it under a microscope in an effort to determine whether it is indeed an ultra-high resolution Retina display. Physically, the purported iPad 3 display is the same size as the current iPad 1 and iPad 2 display at 9.7" in diagonal, and looks quite similar to the naked eye.

However, when comparing the iPad 3 display to one from an iPad 2 under a microscope, the difference in resolutions becomes readily apparent, with the iPad 3 display's pixels appearing to be one-quarter the size of those on the iPad 2.


ipad_2_ipad_3_pixels.jpg


ipad_3_display_mr_ruler.jpg
 
It will probably also come with something new that already exists but with apple it will be introduced as something brand new. I also think they will have more than one version of Ipad one smaller for school, uni and cheaper version and one bigger.
 
If for some reason godforbid the iPad 3 will come out without retina display I will be so disappointed :( I'm so hyped.

you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.
 
It will probably also come with something new that already exists but with apple it will be introduced as something brand new. I also think they will have more than one version of Ipad one smaller for school, uni and cheaper version and one bigger.
I'm not asking for Siri, but can we at least get the Weather, Recorder, Calculator - basic iphone apps. That would awesome

you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.
Isn't it becasue Jobs didn't or couldn't get HD if it wasn't actually HD
 
you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.

Its certainly easier to say "retina display" and people know that you are talking about a display with high ppi. It also flows a lot better, so of course what I mean is that I would be disappointed beyond belief if anything happened at last minute that would mean the iPad 3 does not have a screen with double the resolution.
 
Its certainly easier to say "retina display" and people know that you are talking about a display with high ppi. It also flows a lot better, so of course what I mean is that I would be disappointed beyond belief if anything happened at last minute that would mean the iPad 3 does not have a screen with double the resolution.
Well they are in production, so there is no last minute switching. Either macrumors.com is holding the production model or not.
 
you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.
Would you like everyone to refer to it as "increased pixels per inch" every time refer to it? We've gotten retina display to mean unrecognizable pixel points from an appropriate distance depending on screen size.

And I don't believe you there, iPad 3 with a width less than 960px would not be called retina, even Apple is not that dense. People aren't either.
 
I'm not expecting 4G for a number of reasons. It's just not a good experience as is, because of the carriers mainly. 4G FaceTime would be amazing but I don't know if it's possible this year with the current data caps.
 
I'm not expecting 4G for a number of reasons. It's just not a good experience as is, because of the carriers mainly. 4G FaceTime would be amazing but I don't know if it's possible this year with the current data caps.

Caps are the least of Apple's concerns when it comes to 4g/LTE.

The bigger issue is finding an integrated SOC that won't murder battery life.
 
So what will happen to all iPod/iPhone 4/s apps that look horrible on iPad 1/2? Will apple make so that apps that use retina resolution will scale well with the new screen? Will they also make the apps look better on iPad 1/2?
 
you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.

I'd love to hear the argument that the iPad 3 with this resolution doesn't fit the standard of Retina display. If you're about to say that it isn't greater than 300 PPI than you've already lost the game...unless you're implying that everyone is expected to use iPads a foot from your face....which makes you a crazy person.
 
you do know "retina display" is just a fancy term for a certain ppi, right? even if this really is a lesser ppi than the iphone, Apple will still call it "retina" and most people won't give a shit.

ya, until it means something more concrete we might as well just talk about resolution in terms of ppi
 
ya, until it means something more concrete we might as well just talk about resolution in terms of ppi

This is the Retina graph. Retina is a real thing...it's a marketing term applied to a real concept. Above the line = Retina. Below it = not.

20100712-gnp2xmug237adetiktunhchuew-1-670x488.jpg


It isn't some arbitrary PPI value. The iPad 3 doesn't need to be 300+ PPI to be considered Retina because you don't hold it a foot from your face when you use it. People laying it on their laps or on a desk when they use the iPad because it has a bigger screen and it's heavy enough that you don't want to hold it airborn for a long period of time.

I don't like all this "Retina is a fake Apple thing" talk. It just isn't true. If you watched the keynote Steve laid this all out clearly.
 
The "retina display" semantics argument is the most boring thing you guys talk about over and over again.

It means 4x as many pixels. 4 pixels fit where 1 was before. That's what we want and that's what we'll get. It's what happened to the iPhone screen, and it'll happen to iPad and Mac screens. The end.
 
Jobs explaining the Retina display at the iPhone 4 keynote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohMgjabfiUM#t=5m40s

He talks about how it's pixel doubling (squaring), but he also references how 300PPI is the magic number when the phone is 10-12 inches from the face.

In the case of the iPad 3, there will be the same pixel doubling...but now 300PPI isn't the magic number because you aren't holding iPads 10-12 inches from your face.

Bottom line: it's going to be called a Retina display...and it's going to fit both the pixel doubling definition and the graph definition at the same time...so anyone saying that it "isn't a Retina display" is wrong.
 
That's awesome to see. I'm happy I sold off my original iPad as most of the new one will be paid off. I actually miss not having it.
 
I seriously can't part with my iPad 2. Yeah, first world problems etc, but I don't want to be without it for a month. Since I started considering selling it leading up to this launch I've realized that it's my main computer/internet device. I should be able to get a decent chunk of change after release even for a 32gb 3G.

I'm so pumped for this event. I want to see what they will do about scaling older apps, and if the iPad 2 gets iPhone 4(s) res native for iPhone apps.
 
WSJ already confirmed 4G.

I hope so, just have some doubt. I got burnt last year by iPhone 5 predictions.

This supposed display opens up some crazy possibilities. 1080p YouTube? Higher res Netflix?

I know it's not likely, but I hope we see some new software changes, like faster app switching, and maybe the legitimizing of the 4 finger swipes? Those two go hand in hand IMO. I'm sure we'll see something software related, just don't know how significant it will be.
 
I hope so, just have some doubt. I got burnt last year by iPhone 5 predictions.

This supposed display opens up some crazy possibilities. 1080p YouTube? Higher res Netflix?

I know it's not likely, but I hope we see some new software changes, like faster app switching, and maybe the legitimizing of the 4 finger swipes? Those two go hand in hand IMO. I'm sure we'll see something software related, just don't know how significant it will be.

Does the iPad 2 support 720p html5 videos on YouTube?
 
I'm still impressed by how well the standard YouTube site, with full html5 controls (viewable through desktop mode browsers like Dolphin) actually runs on the iPad 2. It's certainly not fast, but pretty much everything works, and I've only experienced one actual issue (play button sometimes slightly unresponsive.) Couldn't have been a better time for some speedy next-gen silicon.

I know it's not likely, but I hope we see some new software changes, like faster app switching, and maybe the legitimizing of the 4 finger swipes? Those two go hand in hand IMO. I'm sure we'll see something software related, just don't know how significant it will be.
My gut feeling tells me they'll keep things completely hardware focused, bar some new "showoff"-type app for the Retina display (Pictures-related, perhaps?) and then keep any software-related announcements for a separate iOS 6 event. Not that I wouldn't love some hardware-specific OS changes, of course. Perhaps the new silicon is sufficiently kickass for some subtle changes - certainly wouldn't mind speed bumps to the 4-finger swipes, the delay is insane right now (~3 seconds?)
 
In the case of the iPad 3, there will be the same pixel doubling...but now 300PPI isn't the magic number because you aren't holding iPads 10-12 inches from your face.

you probably wouldn't get much closer, but I just busted out a ruler and 12 inches doesn't seem too close and there are situations/sitting positions where you would.
 
I am really excited about the iPad 3; I just hope it releases within Canada at the same time as the United States (wishful :/), and that I will have enough money by the time it is released.
 
I'm hoping it'll release the Friday of the week following the announcement. They've done that before. On MacBreak Weekly this week, Andy Inhatko and Mike Elgan agreed that it wouldn't be out that soon, which bummed me out. They're probably wrong.
 
I'm hoping it'll release the Friday of the week following the announcement. They've done that before. On MacBreak Weekly this week, Andy Inhatko and Mike Elgan agreed that it wouldn't be out that soon, which bummed me out. They're probably wrong.

They're going to want to give developers time to rework apps for the new display. Around 2-3 weeks is likely.
 
I am really excited about the iPad 3; I just hope it releases within Canada at the same time as the United States (wishful :/), and that I will have enough money by the time it is released.
Couldn't you drive across the border and pick it up at a USA store? It'd probably be cheaper too.
 
http://www.macrumors.com/2012/02/19/ipad-3-with-more-tapered-edge-and-an-8-megapixel-back-camera/
The iPad 3 enclosure seems to have a more gradual taper to the edges than the iPad 2. The taper is seen better on the top overview photograph. As a result of this longer taper, the iPad 3's camera rests on the taper itself. We saw this before but due to the dark lighting of that image, the taper seemed more exaggerated.
MN04_024.jpg


I wonder if the difference in thickness can even be felt at all, due to this change. I was never quite happy with the sharp edges of the iPad 2, but maybe the slightly larger volume and longer taper will actually make this one a bit more comfortable to hold.
 
Fuck, macrumors is now reporting that the iPad 3 has a 8 megapixel HD rear camera too and quite possible a HD front camera for FaceTime.

So...
Retina Display
4G LTE
8 megapixel HD rear camera and HD front camera
Quadcore CPU
Quadcore GPU and a gigabyte of ram?

This coming refresh sounds amazing.
 
That's quite a jump for the back camera. Guess the new screen wasn't their only motivation for adding thickness, the battery is probably also a bit larger then. Hope the weight increase isn't too steep.
 
Fuck, macrumors is now reporting that the iPad 3 has a 8 megapixel HD rear camera too and quite possible a HD front camera for FaceTime.

So...
Retina Display
4G LTE
8 megapixel HD rear camera and HD front camera
Quadcore CPU
Quadcore GPU and a gigabyte of ram?

This coming refresh sounds amazing.

No way the entry model will still be $499 if that stuff is true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom