What does "not real" mean?
It means he watched Civil War and kept thinking the third act would've been better if everyone was shirtless, covered in grease fist fighting to the death.
What does "not real" mean?
What does "not real" mean?
It means he watched Civil War and kept thinking the third act would've been better if everyone was shirtless, covered in grease fist fighting to the death.
no fantasy, sci-fi, supernatural stuff.
Duuuude. Thats perfectI wonder if that precludes him from being Bullseye. Cuz he should totally be Bullseye. I wonder if he got my letters...
What's your deal, bruh
It means he watched Civil War and kept thinking the third act would've been better if everyone was shirtless, covered in grease fist fighting to the death.
What's your deal, bruh
Ah. That's...odd.
I wonder if that precludes him from being Bullseye. Cuz he should totally be Bullseye. I wonder if he got my letters...
Mechanic sequel seems like DOA, does this mean Statham is done (for reals this time, he's been doing a lot of under the radar stuff) as a draw?
I don't see that much buzz for Dr. Strange, at least not to the point where you would say Thor 2 numbers are a disappointment.
Is there a consensus opinion on whether Suicide Squad will beat Guardians of the Galaxy in the US final numbers?
Suicide Squad had a bigger opening, but Guardians overtook SS's daily numbers after a week or so into their respective runs. Guardians has been gaining on SS every day, but I can't tell whether the streams will actually cross.
Is there a consensus opinion on whether Suicide Squad will beat Guardians of the Galaxy in the US final numbers?
Suicide Squad had a bigger opening, but Guardians overtook SS's daily numbers after a week or so into their respective runs. Guardians has been gaining on SS every day, but I can't tell whether the streams will actually cross.
Suicide Squad is probably looking at around $5M for next weekend, and $320-325M total. Maybe slightly less if drops pick up now that Suicide Squad will start shedding venues.
The first (new) TMNT made $24M more after Labor Day in 2014, coming off a $15.6M 4-day weekened.
Ok, cool.In both US and worldwide, it'll be in spitting distance, but it's unlikely to pass.
I understood that reference - MattSuicide Squad never gonna hit the 800m to break even
China is already Star Trek Beyond's biggest foreign take with $30,820,011 after the opening weekend.
Using the 55/35/25 rule, the domestic take for the studio has been $85,276,577 (out of the $155,048,322 total), the foreign take has been $34,887,996 (out of the $99,679,989) and the China take has been $7,705,002 (out of the $30,820,011) so the actual amount of money going to the studio from worldwide is $127,869,575 (out of the $285,548,322).
Going by the reported production budget of $185 million, the studio has lost $57,304,425 just based on the production budget. If the Bloomberg numbers are correct and the movie represents a ~$80 million loss for Paramount, does that mean they really only spent $23 million on marketing for the movie? That would explain why so many people didn't even know it was out, but did they really have that little faith in it?
I'm not great with math, so this could be off, but that's concerning if they were just kind of throwing it out to die, as they say.
As for the Bloomberg estimate, that might be after home video and streaming. I never read the article in detail.
320M finish for SS gives it decent legs.
Really think it would have topped BvS with better reviews.
China is already Star Trek Beyond's biggest foreign take with $30,820,011 after the opening weekend.
Using the 55/35/25 rule, the domestic take for the studio has been $85,276,577 (out of the $155,048,322 total), the foreign take has been $34,887,996 (out of the $99,679,989) and the China take has been $7,705,002 (out of the $30,820,011) so the actual amount of money going to the studio from worldwide is $127,869,575 (out of the $285,548,322).
Going by the reported production budget of $185 million, the studio has lost $57,304,425 just based on the production budget. If the Bloomberg numbers are correct and the movie represents a ~$80 million loss for Paramount, does that mean they really only spent $23 million on marketing for the movie? That would explain why so many people didn't even know it was out, but did they really have that little faith in it?
I'm not great with math, so this could be off, but that's concerning if they were just kind of throwing it out to die, as they say.
Usually their mediocre to bad movies don't make $700 million.I'm wondering how Warner Bros "has fallen so low" when the company has a long history of releasing shit movies. Like the shit to good ratio is insane.
320M finish for SS gives it decent legs.
Really think it would have topped BvS with better reviews.
I'm wondering how Warner Bros "has fallen so low" when the company has a long history of releasing shit movies. Like the shit to good ratio is insane.
Aren't they the worst legs of a big budget August movie ever? Or did I read that wrong?
Edit: Just had a look. For the top 35 August openers (#35 is Don't Breathe), only 2 films will have worse legs (Freddy vs Jason and Alien vs Predator). Where does the 'good legs' narrative come from?
SS was huge for an august opener, beyond GotG (which had REALLY good legs) the next biggest august opener is Bourne Ultimatum, 133m v 69m opening.
It has decent enough legs for a comic book movie. Much better legs than BvS. Better multiplier than either X-Men Apocalypse or Civil War. Only Deadpool has it beaten in that department this year thus far.
320M finish for SS gives it decent legs.
Really think it would have topped BvS with better reviews.
Needs better management to do that.Warner Bros loves money, but not too much, otherwise it would make better films.
I'm going all in on Sully next weekend and saying that it grosses $30m (or more!) over the three days.
I have a feeling that a portion of the American Sniper audience are going to turn out for this and make it a minor September hit.
Meh WB gave me nice guys this summer. Will take it over the dull output I get from Disney every year. Kudos to them for nailing what the general audiences want, but their live action output has been mostly bland for years.
Next summer is looking bleak if you want a film with a decent sized budget outside of cinematic universes, sequels and remakes. Dunkirk and Valerian are pretty much it.
Aren't they the worst legs of a big budget August movie ever? Or did I read that wrong?
Edit: Just had a look. For the top 35 August openers (#35 is Don't Breathe), only 2 films will have worse legs (Freddy vs Jason and Alien vs Predator). Where does the 'good legs' narrative come from?
Steven Spielberg's 'The BFG' and fellow Disney release 'Alice Through the Looking Glass" are other giant-sized summer tentpoles racking up major losses.
Ben-Hur? More like Ben-Horrendous.
The ancient tale directed by Timur Bekmambetov is officially the biggest bust of summer 2016 and is on track to lose an epic $120 million or more, according to sources close to the film and multiple box-office analysts consulted by The Hollywood Reporter. The Paramount/MGM release has grossed just $53.9 million to date at the global box office since its mid-August debut, including a dismal $25 million domestically. While it has several major foreign market
Tom Hanks loves him those fall movies based on a true story huh
Deadline and Variety both have Sully at $12M today and over $30M for the weekend.
When the Bough Breaks was put at $6-7M, which would probably mean a $17-20M weekend.
The Wild Life is heading towards a big old flop at an estimated $900k on Friday
EDIT: Also, 3 of the 4 wide releases this weekend (When the Bough Breaks, The Disappointments Room, and The Wild Life) currently have a combined Rotten Tomatoes score of 15%.
COMBINED???
Decent legs compared to the two previous DCEU films and not bad considering the drop after OD.
Not stellar legs overall.
Doctor strange looking trippy should be a selling point tbh, it should be a magic film, not a cape film.