Nope, did it for fun.
Well, I'm sure the adrenaline rush was worth it. maybe even got a stiffy out of the exchange
Nope, did it for fun.
OH no, I realize that there's more to his character than that. I'm saying that, without some level of self-awareness from his part in season 5, if Walt just gets worse and then gets killed by Hank or Jesse or cancer without SOME shading, then the dominant narrative becomes "He was bad the whole time!" Which is a lot less interesting than the dominant narratives of the other TV greats.
This story served its narrative purpose; what else is there to know about it?
Oh my, how quickly you forget.What changed goalposts? It was implicit in the huge ass defense I gave in my position, in the consideration I was giving those posts, that I was always open to hear the other side out. I still think there is a right and wrong side to this argument; I've always just been willing to be proven wrong. Nothing has changed.
There's interpretation and then there's interpretation; without being too unkind, there's literally no room at all for your view of Walter White.
Oh my, how quickly you forget.
Well, I'm sure the adrenaline rush was worth it. maybe even got a stiffy out of the exchange
You know, the most unrealistic thing in this show is that Jesse still calls Walt Mr. White.
Eh. I have respect for Tony as a man. Walt's a pussy.
Strength.Tony literally had no redeeming qualities as a human being.
Not really, because of this exact debate we have going here. What makes this show great isn't that it has shades of grey (it's really limited in its spectrum compared to the other shows you keep bringing up, even if Walt has 5 tones instead of 2). What makes it great is that it stimulates this doubt about his character. People continue to root for him even after he commits one of the most reprehensible acts imaginable, and that's an amazing feat of storytelling.
Strength.
I can accept that, but that's not my experience with the show. I still enjoy the character because it's fascinating how Walt continues to delude himself into thinking that he's a good person. But at the moment his arc still feels incomplete, and I'm hoping that the other shoe drops at some point, in some fashion.
Definition of a moist-ass move.
I can accept that, but that's not my experience with the show. I still enjoy the character because it's fascinating how Walt continues to delude himself into thinking that he's a good person. But at the moment his arc still feels incomplete, and I'm hoping that the other shoe drops at some point, in some fashion.
Whether it's a wimpy move or not, it was an option open to him.
Given where Walt has come, if it is ultimately between him getting caught and him killing Hank, which choice do you think he'd make?
You know, the most unrealistic thing in this show is that Jesse still calls Walt Mr. White.
Who's to say Gus wouldn't have just had him and his family killed from prison?
Strength.
sorry but it's not worth the risk, god knows how many connections a man like Gus has, Snitch on him, and you'll find your wife and kids murdered. Protective custody or not. If there is even a 5% chance of that happening, it's not a risk worth taking.Whether it's a wimpy move or not, it was an option open to him.
I didn't forget anything, I even said in the very post you quoted what it meant. Again, I believe there is no room for any other interpretation. But the fact that I spent a billion words elaborating why I feel this way is implicit that I would like to see the other side's argument. I would like to see them try to formulate some argument.
I've participated in this exact discussion enough times to know it never really comes, but I nonetheless remain eager to hear those sides.
Given where Walt has come, if it is ultimately between him getting caught and him killing Hank, which choice do you think he'd make?
6 Days!
You just have to hope those feds are decent enough at the WitPro thing.
sorry but it's not worth the risk, god knows how many connections a man like Gus has, Snitch on him, and you'll find your wife and kids murdered. Protective custody or not. If there is even a 5% chance of that happening, it's not a risk worth taking.
LaserBuddha said:Every time it starts off with your hyper-aggressive and dismissive shtick, then when you get the inevitable emotional reaction you start saying "I'm trying to have an intelligent and respectful debate, and you're just launching personal attacks!"
Yeah, the guy with the nobel prize is a high school chemistry teacher (a job that doesn't even, generally, require a chemistry degree I should point out) and it's everyone's fault but his own. He quit his high paying job for the family he didn't even have yet, and then never got another job at another chemistry lab in the intervening time for his family too. It's all about protecting his family from him having to hurt his own pride.
Walt's stupid decisions go back way farther than not taking the money. But yeah, he should have taken the money for his family, and he should have done it humbly. Because when your family is on the line that's what you do. It doesn't make you a man to turn it down and start killing people and producing drugs, it just makes you a dick.
He could have served Gus up to the DEA. Probably would have gotten an epic plea bargain out of it.
it's not worth the 5% risk of his family dying when he rats out Gus, but it's worth the likely 30~50% risk of his family dying when he stays doing what he's doing? I mean, Gus even explicitly threatened Walt's entire family. He had people waiting in his house for him. Once, a murderous set of twins were waiting for him in his house too... given what we know about those two, what would they have done if Skylar and the others got in the way?
it's not worth the 5% risk of his family dying when he rats out Gus, but it's worth the likely 30~50% risk of his family dying when he stays doing what he's doing? I mean, Gus even explicitly threatened Walt's entire family. He had people waiting in his house for him. Once, a murderous set of twins were waiting for him in his house too... given what we know about those two, what would they have done if Skylar and the others got in the way?
yeah but at least one is something he has more control of. There is comfort in control. If he turns Gus in, it's all out of his hands what happens next. But if he decides what happens next, then that's something he can work with.
At this exact moment in time? He'd kill Hank, of course, but I also think it would affect him in a way that it wouldn't affect, say, Marlo Stanfield.
Oh god. :O
yeah but at least one is something he has more control of. There is comfort in control. If he turns Gus in, it's all out of his hands what happens next. But if he decides what happens next, then that's something he can work with.
Walt needs (at this point in time, once again) some kind of distance from the actual events threatening his family in order to maintain denial. I think that he would reach some sort of turning point if, say, a family member was killed. Though I couldn't say if it would be a moment of clarity or a point of no return. ^ Also what Pyromaniac said.
I do believe that if Skylar, Walt Jr. or his infant son is killed, he might actually go into some level of 'what have I done' mode. But I think this'd probably quickly be replaced by a need for revenge, and a final affirmation of his negative lifestyle.
Oh god as in, omg I can't wait, or was it something I said ?![]()
So since you're addressing me right now, you're going to pretend that it's just me and not a bunch of other people reacting to your hostile and condescending manner? And I never said you were trying to quash any kind of discussion. It's just that the discussion you want is one where everyone admits they were fools to think differently from you.Like I said, I firmly believe this is one of those times when one side is definitively, provably wrong. But, even though I feel that, I still would like to try to see them formulate a defense of their position. It's why I put so much time into my posts. You can say many things about me, Laser, but one thing you can't say about me is that I've ever done anything except jump into every discussion head on and try to relentlessly draw people out into conversation. This defines every thing I've ever done on neoGAF. Why you'd think this would be the one case where I didn't want that to happen is, as always, beyond me. But you clearly have an axe to grind, and you clearly think I care, so I'll leave you with that.
I would agree that's likely Walt's reasoning, but i'm unsure whether you think that he's being rational here?
Here's an interesting question. Do you think if Walt could go back in time and do things over again from when he found out he had cancer would he? Would he accept Elliot's money and go on living a normal life? Or do you think he's so desperate for power he would never change back to that lifestyle?
Here's an interesting question. Do you think if Walt could go back in time and do things over again from when he found out he had cancer would he? Would he accept Elliot's money and go on living a normal life? Or do you think he's so desperate for power he would never change back to that lifestyle?
Isn'tthe more fun and exciting thing to do?blowing the FUCK out of Gus
So since you're addressing me right now, you're going to pretend that it's just me and not a bunch of other people reacting to your hostile and condescending manner? And I never said you were trying to quash any kind of discussion. It's just that the discussion you want is one where everyone admits they were fools to think differently from you.
Ooh, I like this. But I feel like said "what have I done mode" might still be present even after his revenge is complete? It's not like revenge is especially psychologically healthy.
metalslimer said:Here's an interesting question. Do you think if Walt could go back in time and do things over again from when he found out he had cancer would he? Would he accept Elliot's money and go on living a normal life? Or do you think he's so desperate for power he would never change back to that lifestyle?
Maybe, but, I think Walt really loves being a criminal, really loves what this whole lifestyle does for his ego and his pride, and I think that even though it would be a moment of clarity for one of his family members to die, I also think that'd be replaced completely by some new negative behavior. Because this is Walt now, and I don't see how he ever goes back from the lines he crossed.
But yeah, the fact that we can both see him having such a response shows that he's not completely beyond reason, and therefore beyond sympathy.
It is soooo good. And the way Walt just gets all confidant again. Amazing.Full Measures is on AMC right now. The part where he tells Jesse he's gonna have to kill Gale still gives me goosebumps
It is soooo good. And the way Walt just gets all confidant again. Amazing.
I don't really see intent as being relevant to 'monstrousness' (though I've avoided using that word for a reason, I'll go with it here). 'Monsters' are often unaware of how much damage and harm they're causing, and that's frankly what makes them scary in an Othering sort of way. It's so easy to understand someone who does bad things, knows it, and is even proud of it. It can usually be boiled down to a simple human trait like greed or lust or power.
That Walt clearly *believes*, with a certainty that can't be argued with, that he's doing good while he rains destruction on those around him who he purports to love, is what makes him a frightening individual to me. He doesn't understand his own terribleness and that makes him very different from most people.
[edited in note: please understand that I'm not saying any of the above in a "everyone's the hero of their own story" kind of way, though I do think that's true, of Walt and in general]