Black Republican
Member
just came in, i'll post an article when one shows up
Another loss for the NC GOP
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidn...nforce-votin?utm_term=.jsn6aGpab7#.sdw2MLJMgB
The Associated PressVerified account ‏@AP 2m2 minutes ago
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court refuses to restore North Carolina's GOP-backed voter ID and its reduction in early voting days.
Another loss for the NC GOP
https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidn...nforce-votin?utm_term=.jsn6aGpab7#.sdw2MLJMgB
WASHINGTON — The North Carolina voting restrictions struck down by a federal appeals court earlier this month will remain off the books for November’s election, following a Supreme Court order on Wednesday.
The justices denied North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory’s request to halt enforcement of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down five voting restrictions while the state seeks Supreme Court review of the decision.
Among the provisions in the law that the appeals court has ordered the state not to enforce are limits on the type of photo ID required for voting; reductions to the amount of early voting in the state; and elimination of same-day registration, out-of-precinct provisional voting, and preregistration that allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to indicate an intent to register when they turned 18.
Justice Clarence Thomas would have granted the stay as to all five provisions.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, and Samuel Alito would have granted the stay as to all of the provisions except for the preregistration provision.
It takes a majority of the court to grant a stay, which would mean that five justices would need to have voted for a stay in order for it to be granted.
Notably, no justice provided a so-called “courtesy fifth vote” in support of the stay request — a move that Justice Stephen Breyer did take earlier this summer when a different case presented the same scenario — of four justices willing to vote for a stay, which would be all that is needed in order for the court to take the appeal, but not enough justices to grant a stay while that appeal is decided.