• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

British have invaded all but 22 countries in the world

Status
Not open for further replies.
You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.

Wait, are you taking my use of the word 'ages' literally? Like an actual age? Or? I'm sorry, I'm confused about your argument here. I never said Britain wasn't a modern colonial power.... What's there to argue?
 

ghst

thanks for the laugh
People act as if Britain was alone in its actions, if it didn't compete with other world powers it would have fallen to them. This holds true across all of Europe.

Also Native Americans fought with the British against the Americans in the revolution. Lets not play about here. Britain was hardly the worlds butcher, nor did it ever wear a white dress.

after the war of 1812 in connection with the treaty of ghent, the USA demanded either the return or compensation for the freed slaves which the british settled in their territories, which after russian arbritration the british agreed to pay $1.2m (something like $30m today) for.

i guess that doesn't come up much in american history classes
 
after the war of 1812 in connection with the treaty of ghent, the USA demanded either the return or compensation for the freed slaves which the british settled in their territories, which after russian arbritration the british agreed to pay $1.2m (something like $30m today) for.

i guess that doesn't come up much in american history classes

Does it come up in British history classes that Hitler got the idea of the concentration camp from Britain
 

dalin80

Banned
And now we're a tiny little island with fuck-all to show for it.

One of the most powerful and influential countries in the world especially when you take into account the small population and natural resources.

Things could be far worse.

Does it come up in British history classes that Hitler got the idea of the concentration camp from Britain

I saw your stealth edit to bring in the hitler reference, and yes it was mentioned in history but only briefly. We do afterall have a awful lot to cover.
 

ghst

thanks for the laugh
Does it come up in British history classes that Britain invented the concentration camp?

yeah, it does. the boer wars and other colonial grisliness are all part of our eduction.

this is an equivalence you really don't want to try and make. american exceptionalism is a real thing.
 

genjiZERO

Member
Wait, are you taking my use of the word 'ages' literally? Like an actual age? Or? I'm sorry, I'm confused about your argument here. I never said Britain wasn't a modern colonial power.... What's there to argue?

You said:

People getting really offended about things that happened ages ago? We didn't do bad for a small little island disconnected form the rest of the world...
Sure bad stuph happened, but we're not still doing it now are we? Think we learned from it all to be honest.

I'm saying because Britain is a neo-colonial power in contemporary times the evidence suggests that Britain has not learned from its past mistakes. Britain is still invading and killing people today.

Grimshawish said:
People act as if Britain was alone in its actions, if it didn't compete with other world powers it would have fallen to them. This holds true across all of Europe.

Also Native Americans fought with the British against the Americans in the revolution. Lets not play about here. Britain was hardly the worlds butcher, nor did it ever wear a white dress.
EDIT: Nor did Britain control that much of the United States; and they held onto Canada where natives hold more communities than in the States.

So much bull shit.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/aug/24/india.randeepramesh - murdering people directly

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Victorian_Holocausts - policies that let to the deaths of millions
 

John Dunbar

correct about everything
interesting fact: chad was spared a british invasion because there was a typo in the high command's map that read "chav" and they assumed it was already a part of the empire.
 
Isn't thread title wrong? It should be that British have had conflict all but 22 countries in the world. For example during WWII they declared war to Finland but there was no actual battles fought during the war. I would not call that ''invading''.
 

Scipius

Member
What this list of course doesn't mention is the last country to successfully invade and conquer Britain: the Netherlands.
 

dalin80

Banned
It's car crash tv at its finest.



Hahahahahahaha!


5th in military power
1 of 8 to have a nuclear deterrent
London is the second largest (actually largest by some measures) trading hub in the world.
Has one of the highest standards of living
True democracy with respected legal system
Member of just about every security and political group ever.

Yes we are doing quite well considering a its a few tiny islands, with not a great deal of people and we haven't purchased it all off the back of oil reserves.
 
The Mongolians are looked at historically as butchers. The Romans didn't butcher as many people as the British - you can't claim the Romans depopulated a continent (there used to be Native Americans in North America). And anyway, neither Rome nor the Monglian Empire exists anymore. Britain does. And last time I checked they were still using their army in neo-colonial wars too (at least Iraq).



You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.



I'm not saying British people are bad. I wouldn't call Germans or Japanese people bad. But they get historical and cultural condemnation for all the killing they did. The British do not. That's my only statement
The British Empire was more about consolidating power through trade, something they enforced with an iron fist. It was also heavily responsible for the introduction of industry and other things of that nature, those things combined with the fact that most of the current world powers have orchestrated their their own atrocities means that it is unlikely Britain is going to get singled out.

The British termed the phrase concentration camp, that's it.

And it took the Nazis to turn those into extermination camps.
 

diamount

Banned
They had a few skirmishes in the 1800s before Japan opened up I think. I remember reading about one episode where some british merchants got killed because they refused to bow to a samurai lord or some shit, then the british sent a bunch of warships and bombed the fuck out of the lords hometown.

It can't be really an invasion against a country considering Japan wasn't truly united until the Meji era.
 
There's nothing here to want.


swedish2bwomenxqs28.jpg



There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.
 

Arjen

Member
Isn't thread title wrong? It should be that British have had conflict all but 22 countries in the world. For example during WWII they declared war to Finland but there was no actual battles fought during the war. I would not call that ''invading''.

Yeah, thread title is a bit bulshit. Netherlands were at war with England, but as far as i know they never invaded us.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
What this list of course doesn't mention is the last country to successfully invade and conquer Britain: the Netherlands.

Not sure it quite counts if you were actually invited. Like claiming to gatecrash a party that you've got a ticket to.
 

genjiZERO

Member
The British Empire was more about consolidating power through trade, something they enforced with an iron fist. It was also heavily responsible for the introduction of industry and other things of that nature, those things combined with the fact that most of the current world powers have orchestrated their their own atrocities means that it is unlikely Britain is going to get singled out.

Which lead to the deaths of millions of people. Doing research right now I'm reading estimates of 1.6 billion people dying in India as a result of British actions there. Again, I'm not saying British people are "bad" or that modern Britain doesn't try to be progressive, even if on a global scale it still participates in violent colonialism. My point is that unlike other colonial powers Britain seems to get off culturally from the blame which normatively I think is wrong.
 

Salvadora

Member
Which lead to the deaths of millions of people. Doing research right now I'm reading estimates of 1.6 billion people dying in India as a result of British actions there. Again, I'm not saying British people are "bad" or that modern Britain doesn't try to be progressive, even if on a global scale it still participates in violent colonialism. My point is that unlike other colonial powers Britain seems to get off culturally from the blame which normatively I think is wrong.

There is no way that's even remotely true.
 

KAOz

Short bus special
swedish2bwomenxqs28.jpg



There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.

You know, I look at this picture and just think "Meh. Not even that good looking. Seen way better out and about."

That is proof that I've been living in this country all my life. Just saying.
 

Stumpokapow

listen to the mad man
Not sure it quite counts if you were actually invited. Like claiming to gatecrash a party that you've got a ticket to.

My father is English and about 3 years older than you and something I've always loved about him is the way he half-seriously touts the British Empire. Any time we discuss a historical loss, he goes into spin mode. Any time a historical victory, he seems genuinely proud of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom