what is it that makes a Sweden invasion so hard?
There's nothing here to want.
what is it that makes a Sweden invasion so hard?
You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.
People act as if Britain was alone in its actions, if it didn't compete with other world powers it would have fallen to them. This holds true across all of Europe.
Also Native Americans fought with the British against the Americans in the revolution. Lets not play about here. Britain was hardly the worlds butcher, nor did it ever wear a white dress.
And now we're a tiny little island with fuck-all to show for it.
And now we're a tiny little island with fuck-all to show for it.
after the war of 1812 in connection with the treaty of ghent, the USA demanded either the return or compensation for the freed slaves which the british settled in their territories, which after russian arbritration the british agreed to pay $1.2m (something like $30m today) for.
i guess that doesn't come up much in american history classes
And now we're a tiny little island with fuck-all to show for it.
Does it come up in British history classes that Hitler got the idea of the concentration camp from Britain
Skyfall.
And now we're a tiny little island with fuck-all to show for it.
One of the most powerful and influential countries in the world especially when you take into account the small population and natural resources.
Things could be far worse.
Does it come up in British history classes that Britain invented the concentration camp?
Wait, are you taking my use of the word 'ages' literally? Like an actual age? Or? I'm sorry, I'm confused about your argument here. I never said Britain wasn't a modern colonial power.... What's there to argue?
People getting really offended about things that happened ages ago? We didn't do bad for a small little island disconnected form the rest of the world...
Sure bad stuph happened, but we're not still doing it now are we? Think we learned from it all to be honest.
Grimshawish said:People act as if Britain was alone in its actions, if it didn't compete with other world powers it would have fallen to them. This holds true across all of Europe.
Also Native Americans fought with the British against the Americans in the revolution. Lets not play about here. Britain was hardly the worlds butcher, nor did it ever wear a white dress.
EDIT: Nor did Britain control that much of the United States; and they held onto Canada where natives hold more communities than in the States.
Does it come up in British history classes that Hitler got the idea of the concentration camp from Britain
The Jeremy Kyle Show is good for a laugh.
One of the most powerful and influential countries in the world especially when you take into account the small population and natural resources.
Things could be far worse.
The British termed the phrase concentration camp, that's it.
So you don't dispute that?Uh huh.
We fucking rocked and if you whiny chumps snooze we'll do it again. Consider yourselves warned.
You still have the Falklands.
We fucking rocked and if you whiny chumps snooze we'll do it again. Consider yourselves warned.
Uh huh.
We only invented cricket as a Trojan horse to popularise cucumber sandwiches. Nobody actually cares about the sport.You can't even win in cricket nowadays.
it's interesting how different that would sound if a german would say it.
It's car crash tv at its finest.
Hahahahahahaha!
There's nothing here to want.
The British Empire was more about consolidating power through trade, something they enforced with an iron fist. It was also heavily responsible for the introduction of industry and other things of that nature, those things combined with the fact that most of the current world powers have orchestrated their their own atrocities means that it is unlikely Britain is going to get singled out.The Mongolians are looked at historically as butchers. The Romans didn't butcher as many people as the British - you can't claim the Romans depopulated a continent (there used to be Native Americans in North America). And anyway, neither Rome nor the Monglian Empire exists anymore. Britain does. And last time I checked they were still using their army in neo-colonial wars too (at least Iraq).
You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.
I'm not saying British people are bad. I wouldn't call Germans or Japanese people bad. But they get historical and cultural condemnation for all the killing they did. The British do not. That's my only statement
The British termed the phrase concentration camp, that's it.
They had a few skirmishes in the 1800s before Japan opened up I think. I remember reading about one episode where some british merchants got killed because they refused to bow to a samurai lord or some shit, then the british sent a bunch of warships and bombed the fuck out of the lords hometown.
what is it that makes a Sweden invasion so hard?
Bread.what goes on a cucumber sandwich besides cucumber?
Bunch of colonizing child rapists the british elite are.
There's nothing here to want.
Isn't thread title wrong? It should be that British have had conflict all but 22 countries in the world. For example during WWII they declared war to Finland but there was no actual battles fought during the war. I would not call that ''invading''.
Swedish girls.
What this list of course doesn't mention is the last country to successfully invade and conquer Britain: the Netherlands.
The British Empire was more about consolidating power through trade, something they enforced with an iron fist. It was also heavily responsible for the introduction of industry and other things of that nature, those things combined with the fact that most of the current world powers have orchestrated their their own atrocities means that it is unlikely Britain is going to get singled out.
Which lead to the deaths of millions of people. Doing research right now I'm reading estimates of 1.6 billion people dying in India as a result of British actions there. Again, I'm not saying British people are "bad" or that modern Britain doesn't try to be progressive, even if on a global scale it still participates in violent colonialism. My point is that unlike other colonial powers Britain seems to get off culturally from the blame which normatively I think is wrong.
There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.
This supports the theory that the UK actually takes it's orders from the royal family of Liechtenstein.
Not sure it quite counts if you were actually invited. Like claiming to gatecrash a party that you've got a ticket to.
Could be a neat "Somebody That I Used to Know" parody. Somebody get on this.