• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

British have invaded all but 22 countries in the world

Status
Not open for further replies.

Noshino

Member
The women literally speaking.

swedish2bwomenxqs28.jpg



There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.

;o

i know where im moving to next
 

Hachimaki

Member
This thread just reminded me of the epic poem I read in college called 'Omeros' by Derek Walcott that is about by early history of British colonization and the lasting influences it has had on the land and people.
 
You said:



I'm saying because Britain is a neo-colonial power in contemporary times the evidence suggests that Britain has not learned from its past mistakes. Britain is still invading and killing people today.

This word 'invade', I'm not sure you know what it means in terms of conflict.
 
I'm not sure when Britain is supposed to have invaded Thailand. I'd hate to think these guys count Britain colonising Malaysia...and then some Malaysian states later joining Thailand.
Thereby technically a part of Thailand was once controlled by Britain....hmmmm.
 
Colin Quinn had a funny bit on this. It wasn't really so much invading as it was you guys showing up with your dress uniforms and shiny swords just walking around going "Really? This is where you live?". Countries just screaming hurry up and clean up the British are coming.

Honestly, though, you guys could have done a better job at drawing maps. Iraq? Really? Who was drunk when they drew those boundaries?
 

Desmond

Member
Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo


800 years of oppression you tossers



jk, I actually don't mind you Brits <3
 
well if you learn some history about what uk did on the colonies leaves the nazis like emo school girls

it was surreal,they even use chemical weapons on his day

the thing is britain learned to have GOOD PR,others dont

http://exiledonline.com/when-pigs-fly-and-scold-brits-lecturing-sri-lanka/all/1/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/apr/18/britain-destroyed-records-colonial-crimes?CMP=twt_gu

imagine a german who post a nazi flag and his proud of their war crimes?

US invented PR and mastered it way better than Britain. At least give the credit where it is due.
 

Scipius

Member
Not sure it quite counts if you were actually invited. Like claiming to gatecrash a party that you've got a ticket to.

That's typically what British history has made of it, but it wasn't really; that invitation was just an engineered pretext.

To put it in more modern terms, the Dutch enacted a regime change on the British, put their man on the throne, realigned the focus of British military power away from them and onto France and, en passant, gave Britain the liberal democracy they still cherish today.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
That's typically what British history has made of it, but it wasn't really; that invitation was just an engineered pretext.

To put it in more modern terms, the Dutch enacted a regime change on the British, put their man on the throne, realigned the focus of British military power away from them and onto France and, en passant, gave Britain the liberal democracy they still cherish today.

Alternatively, to put it in, well less Dutch terms it was our existing liberal democracy that invited the Dutch monarch over to replace the illiberal one we had already.

Getting to sound more like Stumpy's Dad every minute.
 
That's typically what British history has made of it, but it wasn't really; that invitation was just an engineered pretext.

To put it in more modern terms, the Dutch enacted a regime change on the British, put their man on the throne, realigned the focus of British military power away from them and onto France and, en passant, gave Britain the liberal democracy they still cherish today.
What event are we talking about here?
 
With the dreadful weather and food they got over there I can see why.

Could say the same about America..I mean, there's always shit weather somewhere in America at any one time, and the food, well..lol...what would you guys do without the deep fat fryer and processed cheese.
 

Fritz

Member
it's interesting how different that would sound if a german would say it.

Difference is we are secretely still at it. First we force everyone to buy stuff from us till they go bankrupt. Then we'll force everyone to shut down nuclear power plants. That will show them. Then we sell more stuff and BAM the world is our's. War doesn't even gets mentioned, we hate that word!
 
By the time Britain entered the colony game most of the world was discovered already.

With discussions like this you find out that Britain has both scraped through history without taking blame for anything and at the same time is responsible for every bad that a European looking person did in the world even by neglect.
 
Who has said that?

Which lead to the deaths of millions of people. Doing research right now I'm reading estimates of 1.6 billion people dying in India as a result of British actions there. Again, I'm not saying British people are "bad" or that modern Britain doesn't try to be progressive, even if on a global scale it still participates in violent colonialism. My point is that unlike other colonial powers Britain seems to get off culturally from the blame which normatively I think is wrong.

I was thinking of this and the guy who said that Britain doesn't get any shit because it has good PR.
 
England never invaded Portugal, England in common Alliance with Portugal banded together against Spain and Napoleon.

Spain and England have been enemies for centuries.
France and England have been enemies for centuries.

Spain often made alliances with France.
Portugal has been enemies with Spain for centuries.


Portugal and England have been allied since the Windsor Treaty, oldest Alliance on Earth .
I don't know man. Maybe England had to cross some citys of Portugal to get to another Spanish partisans citys in the Peninsular War? And there's still the gold market time, Brazil -> Portugal -> England, maybe at some point there was some disagreement between Portugal and England? And there's still the times when the United Kingdom was a land of brits, picts, goidels, them scots. Maybe at some point they invaded Hispania Lusitania?

Has Sweden ever been invaded and conquered?
Geats, Gutes, Norwegians, Danes.

The Mongolians are looked at historically as butchers. The Romans didn't butcher as many people as the British - you can't claim the Romans depopulated a continent (there used to be Native Americans in North America). And anyway, neither Rome nor the Monglian Empire exists anymore. Britain does. And last time I checked they were still using their army in neo-colonial wars too (at least Iraq).



You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.



I'm not saying British people are bad. I wouldn't call Germans or Japanese people bad. But they get historical and cultural condemnation for all the killing they did. The British do not. That's my only statement
Romans did not depopulated a continent, you are right, but they did that to so many citys that is way more brutal that the British. See this: Roman genocide.

Obviously they don't get condemnation. Same for the U.S. History is made by the winners and for the winners, after all.

Considering that their definition of "invasion" that the British sent some soldiers there, I guess that's not surprising.

When did they "invade" Japan? Are they just counting all of the UK's WW2 efforts as invasions? Seems unfair.
I think is on the time of the Boshin War, they bombed japan harbor and got together with the Imperialists, as well as the US, France, etc.

About Poland... maybe in the Jagiellon dynasty, with they foe the Teutonic Knights, the British interfere it? Hell, i don't know.
 

Scipius

Member
Alternatively, to put it in, well less Dutch terms it was our existing liberal democracy that invited the Dutch monarch over to replace the illiberal one we had already.

As said, the invitation of the Immortal Seven was just a part of the overall conspiracy the Dutch were already running in Britain to try and move Britain into their sphere. James II (VII) was undoubtedly unpopular and it makes an invasion a whole lot easier if you can get a large portion of the enemy to defect to your side. Hence the "invitation" by what were in fact traitors to the lawful monarch. Lucky for them, they were on the winning (Dutch) side.

The Dutch had to take Britain out of the equation at the time, invitation or not, and they succeeded. Though it never had the profound political and cultural impact the Norman invasion had, I've always found it curious that the effects of the Dutch invasion are largely ignored. Fittingly, in the Netherlands, it seems to have been completely forgotten.
 

diamount

Banned
With discussions like this you find out that Britain has both scraped through history without taking blame for anything and at the same time is responsible for every bad that a European looking person did in the world even by neglect.

You better not be American. Because they pretty much wrote the book on one-sided history.
 
Anyway, the Swedes have been put on notice...

If colonialism ever comes back into fashion, the new British Empire starts with you.

I'd start stockpiling those meatballs now.
 

IceCold

Member
Captain Cook says LOL

Some of the places he went were already known by certain Europeans. But yeah, he discovered a bunch of pacific islands that no one really cared about since they contained few resources or man power.


I don't know man. Maybe England had to cross some citys of Portugal to get to another Spanish partisans citys in the Peninsular War? And there's still the gold market time, Brazil -> Portugal -> England, maybe at some point there was some disagreement between Portugal and England? And there's still the times when the United Kingdom was a land of brits, picts, goidels, them scots. Maybe at some point they invaded Hispania Lusitania?

No never happen. The closes thing to this was during the Napoleonic Wars when the Portuguese royal family went to Brazil and the British joined forces with the Portuguese army during the Peninsular Wars. You could say that Portugal was a British protectorate during that period but after the royal family came back they gtfo (especially after some higher ups in Portugal felt they were staying a bit too long in Portugal) . But you can't really call something an invasion if there was an agreement between both parties. 99% of the wars in Portuguese lands (after it was a country) were with Spain/Castile and the Moors.
 
Most the places he went was already known certain Europeans. But yeah, he discovered a bunch of pacific islands that no one really cared about since they contained few resources or man power.

Yeah he was a shitty discoverer, and those Polynesians, Aborigines, Aleutians, Eskimos and Micronesians? fucking useless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom