There is no way that's even remotely true.
Probably, it's from a terrible source. But it's still likely millions upon millions.
There is no way that's even remotely true.
The women literally speaking.
There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.
Fascinating stuff.
Could be a neat "Somebody That I Used to Know" parody. Somebody get on this.
Probably, it's from a terrible source. But it's still likely millions upon millions.
Must be the reason why Switzerland invaded Liechtenstein a few years ago.
You said:
I'm saying because Britain is a neo-colonial power in contemporary times the evidence suggests that Britain has not learned from its past mistakes. Britain is still invading and killing people today.
Does it come up in British history classes that Hitler got the idea of the concentration camp from Britain
And yet, British food is still awful.
thank god that English became the language of business and not French
they even use chemical weapons on his day
As a Jamaican I would like to say England sucks and I don't accept the queen as my monarch.
;o
i know where im moving to next
Latin is for dorks and witches.We should go back to Latin as the academic language imo.
Latin is for dorks and witches.
No surprises
well if you learn some history about what uk did on the colonies leaves the nazis like emo school girls
it was surreal,they even use chemical weapons on his day
the thing is britain learned to have GOOD PR,others dont
http://exiledonline.com/when-pigs-fly-and-scold-brits-lecturing-sri-lanka/all/1/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/apr/18/britain-destroyed-records-colonial-crimes?CMP=twt_gu
imagine a german who post a nazi flag and his proud of their war crimes?
But Gordon Ramsey!!!
There's even a reason to go to war with Sweden in the subtitle.
Define "British food."
We should go back to Latin as the academic language imo.
Not sure it quite counts if you were actually invited. Like claiming to gatecrash a party that you've got a ticket to.
Yes, the Swiss tried to lead the charge against the evil global Liechtensteinian menace but were turned back by forces unknown.
That's typically what British history has made of it, but it wasn't really; that invitation was just an engineered pretext.
To put it in more modern terms, the Dutch enacted a regime change on the British, put their man on the throne, realigned the focus of British military power away from them and onto France and, en passant, gave Britain the liberal democracy they still cherish today.
What event are we talking about here?That's typically what British history has made of it, but it wasn't really; that invitation was just an engineered pretext.
To put it in more modern terms, the Dutch enacted a regime change on the British, put their man on the throne, realigned the focus of British military power away from them and onto France and, en passant, gave Britain the liberal democracy they still cherish today.
What event are we talking about here?
They've "invaded" way more than 22 countries, if you count all the diseases they've spread during "discovery" missions.
With the dreadful weather and food they got over there I can see why.
it's interesting how different that would sound if a german would say it.
By the time Britain entered the colony game most of the world was discovered already.
By the time Britain entered the colony game most of the world was discovered already.
Who has said that?With discussions like this you find out that Britain has both scraped through history without taking blame for anything and at the same time is responsible for every bad that a European looking person did in the world even by neglect.
Who has said that?
Which lead to the deaths of millions of people. Doing research right now I'm reading estimates of 1.6 billion people dying in India as a result of British actions there. Again, I'm not saying British people are "bad" or that modern Britain doesn't try to be progressive, even if on a global scale it still participates in violent colonialism. My point is that unlike other colonial powers Britain seems to get off culturally from the blame which normatively I think is wrong.
I was thinking of this and the guy who said that Britain doesn't get any shit because it has good PR.
I don't know man. Maybe England had to cross some citys of Portugal to get to another Spanish partisans citys in the Peninsular War? And there's still the gold market time, Brazil -> Portugal -> England, maybe at some point there was some disagreement between Portugal and England? And there's still the times when the United Kingdom was a land of brits, picts, goidels, them scots. Maybe at some point they invaded Hispania Lusitania?England never invaded Portugal, England in common Alliance with Portugal banded together against Spain and Napoleon.
Spain and England have been enemies for centuries.
France and England have been enemies for centuries.
Spain often made alliances with France.
Portugal has been enemies with Spain for centuries.
Portugal and England have been allied since the Windsor Treaty, oldest Alliance on Earth .
Geats, Gutes, Norwegians, Danes.Has Sweden ever been invaded and conquered?
Romans did not depopulated a continent, you are right, but they did that to so many citys that is way more brutal that the British. See this: Roman genocide.The Mongolians are looked at historically as butchers. The Romans didn't butcher as many people as the British - you can't claim the Romans depopulated a continent (there used to be Native Americans in North America). And anyway, neither Rome nor the Monglian Empire exists anymore. Britain does. And last time I checked they were still using their army in neo-colonial wars too (at least Iraq).
You statement was about people getting angry about things that happened "ages" ago. But it's not ages. It's contemporaneous. Britain is a colonial power in 2012.
I'm not saying British people are bad. I wouldn't call Germans or Japanese people bad. But they get historical and cultural condemnation for all the killing they did. The British do not. That's my only statement
I think is on the time of the Boshin War, they bombed japan harbor and got together with the Imperialists, as well as the US, France, etc.Considering that their definition of "invasion" that the British sent some soldiers there, I guess that's not surprising.
When did they "invade" Japan? Are they just counting all of the UK's WW2 efforts as invasions? Seems unfair.
Alternatively, to put it in, well less Dutch terms it was our existing liberal democracy that invited the Dutch monarch over to replace the illiberal one we had already.
With discussions like this you find out that Britain has both scraped through history without taking blame for anything and at the same time is responsible for every bad that a European looking person did in the world even by neglect.
Captain Cook says LOL
I don't know man. Maybe England had to cross some citys of Portugal to get to another Spanish partisans citys in the Peninsular War? And there's still the gold market time, Brazil -> Portugal -> England, maybe at some point there was some disagreement between Portugal and England? And there's still the times when the United Kingdom was a land of brits, picts, goidels, them scots. Maybe at some point they invaded Hispania Lusitania?
Most the places he went was already known certain Europeans. But yeah, he discovered a bunch of pacific islands that no one really cared about since they contained few resources or man power.
Anyway, the Swedes have been put on notice...
If colonialism ever comes back into fashion, the new British Empire starts with you.
I'd start stockpiling those meatballs now.