Positive feedback for KooPaL, all the games arrived perfectly as described.
Positive feedback for ilnadmy. He shipped Demon's Souls quickly, was understanding about some Paypal discrepancies.
Masters of the Universe Classics Optik (mint on card) $27 shipped
Masters of the Universe Teela (mint on card) $28 shipped
Masters of the Universe Mer-Man (mint on card) $27 shipped
Masters of the Universe Skeletor 1st edition (mint on card) $30 shipped
CCP Hedo-Goji (like new) $30 shipped
CCP Jirass (like new) $30 shipped
Unless noted all games are original releases, non-player's choice/greatest/platinum hits.
Resident Evil 6 (Mint, Like New) $29 shipped
Positive Feedback for ilnadmy, polite and quick payment, thanks again
Positive feedback for cuevas, PhD., smooth transaction
sounds like person A already made an agreement to person B and received payment regardless of the realization that said games are valued higher. simple as that.Question for y'all on trade etiquette/behavior. This scenario does not directly relate to a trade on this forum, but I think it's still relevant to trades that can come up here...
Person A regularly posts on a video game forum discussing video game pickups. They mention a recent garage sale where they saw video game items, however the system and price did not interest them. Multiple people respond that they would have purchased the items. 10 days or so pass. Person B contacts person A about said items. Person A offers person B a "finders fee" if they will go back to pick up the items. Person A declines the finders fee, but the two work out a deal to cover the price, shipping, and a trade of a few good SNES games for Person A's time/effort. Person A was not planning to return to the garage sale apart from this transaction. Neither person knows each other apart from online PMs.
Person A picks up the video games. They call person B and tell them, and the terms of the deal are verified orally. Person B sends person A the requested amount via Paypal. The SNES games are not yet mailed, as it is a weekend. Person A proceeds to post pictures of the pickup within the same forum. Person A is flooded with offers for the items, which are indeed quite valuable (much more than was paid at the garage sale).
The dilemma: What is Person A's responsibility? Is it still an open market as Person A has not yet relinquished the games (e.g. refund the paypal)? Are the games "spoken for" and Person A should ignore the better offers? Should Person A ask more from Person B but still give them the ability to buy over others?
Curious to hear responses.
i don't know the value of said games (could be a sealed mint copy of earthbound)...
Positive feedback for The Insane Dufresne. The disc I bought showed up faster than humanly possible.
if person A wants to be a decent, responsible person, they should honor their agreement.Question for y'all on trade etiquette/behavior. This scenario does not directly relate to a trade on this forum, but I think it's still relevant to trades that can come up here...
Person A regularly posts on a video game forum discussing video game pickups. They mention a recent garage sale where they saw video game items, however the system and price did not interest them. Multiple people respond that they would have purchased the items. 10 days or so pass. Person B contacts person A about said items. Person B offers person A a "finders fee" if they will go back to pick up the items. Person A declines the finders fee, but the two work out a deal to cover the price, shipping, and a trade of a few good SNES games for Person A's time/effort. Person A was not planning to return to the garage sale apart from this transaction. Neither person knows each other apart from online PMs.
Person A picks up the video games. They call person B and tell them, and the terms of the deal are verified orally. Person B sends person A the requested amount via Paypal. The SNES games are not yet mailed, as it is a weekend. Person A proceeds to post pictures of the pickup within the same forum. Person A is flooded with offers for the items, which are indeed quite valuable (much more than was paid at the garage sale).
The dilemma: What is Person A's responsibility? Is it still an open market as Person A has not yet relinquished the games (e.g. refund the paypal)? Are the games "spoken for" and Person A should ignore the better offers? Should Person A ask more from Person B but still give them the ability to buy over others?
Curious to hear responses.
You're person A, aren't you?Garage sale price, $80. eBay price at least ten times that.
Garage sale price, $80. eBay price at least ten times that.
Question for y'all on trade etiquette/behavior. This scenario does not directly relate to a trade on this forum, but I think it's still relevant to trades that can come up here...
Person A regularly posts on a video game forum discussing video game pickups. They mention a recent garage sale where they saw video game items, however the system and price did not interest them. Multiple people respond that they would have purchased the items. 10 days or so pass. Person B contacts person A about said items. Person B offers person A a "finders fee" if they will go back to pick up the items. Person A declines the finders fee, but the two work out a deal to cover the price, shipping, and a trade of a few good SNES games for Person A's time/effort. Person A was not planning to return to the garage sale apart from this transaction. Neither person knows each other apart from online PMs.
Person A picks up the video games. They call person B and tell them, and the terms of the deal are verified orally. Person B sends person A the requested amount via Paypal. The SNES games are not yet mailed, as it is a weekend. Person A proceeds to post pictures of the pickup within the same forum. Person A is flooded with offers for the items, which are indeed quite valuable (much more than was paid at the garage sale).
The dilemma: What is Person A's responsibility? Is it still an open market as Person A has not yet relinquished the games (e.g. refund the paypal)? Are the games "spoken for" and Person A should ignore the better offers? Should Person A ask more from Person B but still give them the ability to buy over others?
Curious to hear responses.
NoRéN;45339391 said:You're person A, aren't you?
WTB!
Anyone got two USB or wireless microphones for xbox 360 laying around somewhere? The Karaoke app just got out today and I would like to play with real mics with the family instead of the headsets.
Kind of weird on MS part to release a Karaoke game while there's no microphones being sold anywhere. I'm in Canada.
Thanks!